Based on your experience personally or professionally, what do you think is the relationship of nursing leadership to disease outbreaks like COVID-19. Describe the leadership skills and traits that you think are helpful in these types of circumstances.
Submit a paper on Abo Blood Synthetic Lab Report.
The focus is on your ability to integrate your subjective and objective information gathering into formulation of diagnoses and development of patient-centered, evidence-based plans of care for patients of all ages with multiple complex mental health conditions.
Chosen specialty is psychiatric Nursing and/or mental health nursing.
Research the following information regarding the chosen nursing specialty: (psychiatric nursing)
Is a degree necessary for the position (ie: RN, BSN, MSN)
Is profession experience necessary for the position ( ? # yrs experience, critical care experience needed?, etc)
Is there a professional association specific to the chosen specialty?
Provide the address and contact information for association.
Are there any professional journals specific to the specialty?
Is there a necessary specialized certification exam for the specialty?
Are there any national/international conferences?
Are there any renowned speakers/experts in this nursing specialty field? If so, name them.
4. Research and present the position as it relates to the following:
degree of autonomy
demands/rewards specific to the specialty
What personal/professional attributes would be necessary to be successful in this specialty?
What other members of the health care team collaborate closely with this specialty of nursing?
Find three articles in recent nursing/health care journals that are associated with this nursing specialty.
DISCUSS THE IMPACTS OF ADVOCATING FOR THE NURSING ROLE IN PROGRAM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION.
DISCUSS THE REGULATION FOR NURSING PRACTICE STAFF DEVELOPMENT MEETING.
Write a 4–5-page analysis of a current problem or issue in health care, including a proposed solution and possible ethical implications.
Instructions Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriiptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. Describe the health care problem or issue you selected for use in Assessment 2 and provide details about it. Explore your chosen topic. For this, you should use the first four steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach to aid your critical thinking.
This approach was introduced in Assessment 2. Identify possible causes for the problem or issue. Use scholarly information to describe and explain the health care problem or issue and identify possible causes for it. Identify at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles about the topic. You may find the How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles? library guide helpful in locating appropriate references.
You may use articles you found while working on Assessment 2 or you may search the Capella library for other articles. Use scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles published during the past 3–5 years that relate to your topic You may find the applicable Undergraduate Library Research Guide helpful in your search.
Review the Think Critically About Source Quality to help you complete the following: Assess the credibility of the information sources. Assess the relevance of the information sources. Analyze the health care problem or issue. Describe the setting or context for the problem or issue. Describe why the problem or issue is important to you. Identify groups of people affected by the problem or issue. Provide examples that support your analysis of the problem or issue. Discuss potential solutions for the health care problem or issue. Describe what would be required to implement a solution. Describe potential consequences of ignoring the problem or issue. Provide the pros and cons for one of the solutions you are proposing. Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented. Describe what would be necessary to implement the proposed solution. Explain the ethical principles that need to be considered (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if the potential solution was implemented.
Provide examples from the literature to support the points you are making. Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like: example 4 (this is using the information in the 1st paper you wrote for me) Additional Requirements Your assessment should also meet the following requirements: Length: 4–6 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point. APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance. Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. Using outside sources: Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style. References: Integrate information from outside sources to include at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles and three in-text citations within the paper. APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citations of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.
Organize your paper using the following structure and headings: Title page. A separate page. Introduction. A brief one-paragraph statement about the purpose of the paper. Elements of the problem/issue. Identify the elements of the problem or issue or question. Analysis. Analyze, define, and frame the problem or issue. Considering options. Consider solutions, responses, or answers. Solution. Choose a solution, response, or answer. Ethical implications. Ethical implications of implementing the solution. Implementation. Implementation of the potential solution. Conclusion.
One paragraph. *****this is the example given***** Analyzing Healthcare Issues Your Name Capella University NHS4000: Developing a Healthcare Perspective Instructor Name Month, Year Health disparities among individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) remain a persistent challenge in healthcare reflecting systemic inequalities that impact access, outcomes, and overall well- being. This paper will explain this issue of health care disparities for low SES people, analyze the contributing factors, compare potential solutions, discuss ethical considerations surrounding the implementation of these solutions, and how solutions can benefit individuals with their chronic disease management. Health Disparities for Low SES People Low SES individuals face a health disparity because of social determinants that extend beyond the healthcare system. These determinants include income, education, employment, housing, and access to healthcare resources (Jones, et al., 2022). Individuals with low SES often encounter barriers in accessing quality healthcare services, leading to delayed diagnosis, inadequate treatment, and poorer health outcomes. Factors contributing to health disparities include limited financial resources, lack of health insurance, transportation challenges, and reduced health literacy (Garcia, et al., 2023). These individuals may experience higher rates of chronic conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity, which can be exacerbated by inadequate access to preventive care and health education (Jones, et al., 2022). Analyzing Health Disparities for Low SES People Studies consistently demonstrate that individuals with lower SES experience higher mortality rates, increased prevalence of chronic diseases, and reduced life expectancy compared to their higher SES counterparts (Smith & Johnson, 2021). The disparities due to lower SES can include limited financial resources, transportation and technology which can limit their ability to attend needed appointments to not only treat illness, but also provide preventative care. Individuals may want to attend needed appointments and take their prescriiptions as ordered but may lack the ability to do so because of financial limitations. Comparing and Contrasting Solutions One solution is the expansion of community health clinics and mobile healthcare units to enhance accessibility along with the use of telemedicine. These initiatives bring healthcare services directly to underserved populations. This eliminates the individuals missing their appointments because there is not adequate transportation. Another strategy involves targeted public health education campaigns that raise awareness about preventive measures, available resources, and the importance of regular health check-ups. Increasing health literacy empowers individuals to make informed decisions about their health and navigate the healthcare system more effectively. The goal of this strategy is to make individuals aware of the services available to them so they can improve their overall health and wellbeing. To help individuals be able to afford healthcare services, healthcare providers can implement financial assistance programs and sliding scale fees for low SES individuals (Smith & Johnson, 2021). These initiatives aim to reduce financial barriers, ensuring that cost does not deter individuals from seeking necessary medical care. Ethical Principles in Implementing Solutions The implementation of solutions to address health disparities for low SES individuals must be guided by ethical principles.
The creation of mobile healthcare units follows the four ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence and autonomy and justice. Beneficence requires interventions that actively promote the well-being of individuals, focusing on improving access to healthcare, preventive services, and health education. Having a mobile unit ensures low SES individuals will have access to care available to them. Nonmaleficence calls for the avoidance of harm, emphasizing the importance of addressing the root causes of health disparities. The mobile clinics address the issue of individuals not having transportation to attend needed healthcare visits. Respecting autonomy involves recognizing low SES individuals in their healthcare decisions. The mobile healthcare units allow the individual to decide to seek treatment and give them the option to attend appointments they may not have been able to because of limited transportation. Justice is a fundamental ethical principle that underscores the need for fair and equitable distribution of healthcare resources. The utilization of a mobile healthcare clinic helps those in need to be able to seek out and obtain healthcare when needed, promoting equal access to quality healthcare for all. Solutions and Chronic Disease Management The proposed solutions to address health disparities for low SES individuals have direct implications for chronic disease management. Community-based interventions and increased access to healthcare services enhance the continuum of care for individuals with chronic conditions. Providing a mobile healthcare clinic is beneficial for chronic disease management among low SES populations. The mobile clinic provides a convenient and accessible means for individuals to consult healthcare professionals, monitor their conditions, and receive timely advice, especially in areas with limited healthcare infrastructure. Conclusion In conclusion, addressing health disparities for low SES individuals is a complex process that requires a comprehensive understanding of the contributing factors, thoughtful analysis, and ethical considerations in the implementation of solutions. The creation and use of a mobile clinic can help bridge the gap in healthcare access and promote preventive care while upholding ethical principles. A mobile clinic creates a location that benefits all individuals, particularly those facing chronic diseases in low SES communities. References Garcia, R., Hickey, M. T., Stillo, M., & Marquez, C. (2023). The impact of public transportation on health outcomes: A longitudinal study of low SES individuals. Journal of Nursing, 30(1), 78-91. Jones, M., King, O., Shaw, N. (2022). Access to primary care services for low SES individuals: A systematic Review. Journal of Health Equity, 8(2), 112-125. Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2021). Bridging the Gap: Nursing interventions for low SES populations. Journal of Nursing Research, 25(3), 45-58
How has the covid 19 pandemic influenced the diagnosis of OCD in youth ages 10-19 years of age?
Name of the assignment: Culture, ethnicity, social, and gender differences Power Point Assignment Introduction: At MRU we are promoting our nursing students to develop cultural competence that enables them to deliver healthcare to diverse populations. These experiences empower nursing graduates to meet people where they are at, honoring their cultural beliefs and providing equitable care. By fostering cultural connections within our communities, community colleges and the associate degree nursing pathway contribute to the growth of graduates who are not only skilled healthcare professionals but also compassionate global citizens. Nurses are responsible for creating a nonjudgmental, welcoming environment for all patients. Still, transgender and gender-nonconforming patients continue to face healthcare prejudices and feel unwelcome in healthcare environments. To provide gender-affirming holistic nursing care requires a paradigm shift from a gender-binary to a gender-inclusive world view with continual ongoing self-assessment for bias. Nurses must learn more about gender transition and gender-affirming care to engage in therapeutic gender-affirming care. Assignment Core Objectives: Concepts of diversity, equity, inclusion and/or social determinants of health Culturally Congruent Care in Nursing: cultural competence, culture sensitivity, cultural knowledge, and cultural assessment Relationship between Nursing Culturally Congruent Care and Community Engagement Affirming Gender Identity in Nursing Care: Benefits, Barriers, and Best Practices Instructions: Create a Power Point describing concepts of diversity, equity, inclusion and/or social determinants of health. Explain how a nurse might provide culturally congruent care by been culturally competent, having culture sensitivity, cultural knowledge, and using cultural assessment. Mention the Relationship between Nursing culturally congruent care and community engagement. How a nurse could affirm gender identity in nursing care: benefits, barriers, and best practices. The student will create a power point with a minimum of 3 slides for issues objective criteria, for a total of minimum 12 slides. The Power Point should include key elements identified to substantiate your presentation and provide appropriate references. This assignment will count as an additional 5 % toward your final course score. Bellow rubric will describe the evaluation method and score based on major concepts related to Culture, ethnicity, social, and gender differences. COURSE STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOME ADDRESSED (CSLOs):
# 4. Identify therapies and treatments available to various patient populations with mental illness across the life span. END OF PROGRAM STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES MAPPING (EOPSLOs): # 2. Provide nursing care that incorporates the knowledge of expected growth and development principles, culture and spirituality, prevention and/or early detection of health problems, and strategies to achieve optimal health.
Identifying analysis techniques for assessing competitive advantage is important for building health care strategy. Sustaining health care competitive advantage requires that leaders understand environmental demands to assist with minimizing weakness and threats from the external environment. This assessment provides you with an opportunity to examine your health care environment to determine whether what is being accomplished in your organization, department, team, community project, or other care setting is making a positive difference. Preparation Note: You will use the results of this analysis to develop a strategic plan in Assessment 2. You have been asked to conduct an analysis of your care setting that will result in two potential pathways toward a strategic plan to improve health care quality and safety in your organization, department, team, community project, or other care setting. To accomplish this, you will take two approaches to the analysis: Complete the discovery and dream phases of an appreciative inquiry (AI) project. Conduct a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis. To help ensure that your analysis is well-received, the requester has suggested that you: Present your analysis results in four parts:
Part 1: Appreciative Inquiry Discovery and Dream.
Part 2: SWOT Analysis. Part 3: Comparison of Approaches. Part 4: Analysis of Relevant Leadership Characteristics and Skills. Your analysis should be 4–7 pages in length. Note: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center’s Writing Support page. As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment. One key aspect to being an effective leader, manager, or administrator is an awareness of your leadership strengths, weaknesses, and style. How would you assess your general leadership, communication, and relationship-building skills? How would describe your leadership style? Imagine the future for a care setting that is your place of practice or one in which you would like to work. What aspirational goals can you envision that would lead to improvements in health care quality and safety? How well do these goals align with the mission, vision, and values of your care setting? Analysis Requirements Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so at a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. Writing, Supporting Evidence, and APA Style Communicate professionally when conducting interviews and collecting data. Write clearly, with professionalism and respect for stakeholders and colleagues. Integrate relevant sources of evidence to support your assertions. Cite at least 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence. Include relevant interview information. Format your document using APA style. Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX]. Be sure to include: A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required. A running head on all pages. Appropriate section headings. Properly formatted citations and references. Proofread your writing to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult to focus on the substance of your analysis. Part 1: Appreciative Inquiry Discovery and Dream Synthesize stories and evidence about times when a care setting performed at its best with regard to quality and safety goals. Collect stories from your care setting. You may collect stories through interviews or conversations with colleagues or provide your own. Explain how your stories are related to quality and safety goals. Describe the evidence you have that substantiates your stories. Identify the positive themes reflected in your stories. Describe other evidence (for example: data, awards, accreditations) that validates your care setting’s positive core. Propose positive, yet attainable, quality and safety improvement goals for your care setting. Explain how accomplishing these goals will lead to ethical and culturally-sensitive improvements in quality and safety. Explain how your proposed goals align with your care setting’s mission, vision, and values. Part 2: SWOT Analysis Conduct a SWOT analysis of your care setting, with respect to quality and safety goals. Provide a narrative description of your analysis. Identify the assessment tool you used as the basis of your analysis. Describe your key findings and their relationships to quality and safety goals. Describe one area of concern that you identified in your SWOT analysis—relevant to your care setting’s mission, vision, and values—for which you would propose pursuing improvements. Explain how this area of concern relates to your care setting’s mission, vision, and values. Explain why you believe it will be necessary and valuable to pursue improvements related to this area of concern.
Part 3: Comparison of Approaches Compare the AI and SWOT approaches to analysis and reflect on the results. Describe your mindset when examining your care setting from an AI perspective and from a SWOT perspective. Describe the types of data and evidence you searched for when taking an AI approach and a SWOT approach. Describe the similarities and differences between the two approaches when communicating and interacting with colleagues. Part 4: Analysis of Relevant Leadership Characteristics and Skills Analyze the leadership characteristics and skills most desired in the person leading potential performance improvement projects, taking both an AI and SWOT approach. Explain how these characteristics and skills would help a leader facilitate a successful AI-based project and a successful SWOT-based project. Comment on any shared characteristics or skills you identified as helpful for both AI and SWOT approaches. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria: Competency 1: Evaluate qualities and skills that promote effective leadership within health care organizations. Analyze the leadership characteristics and skills most desired in the person leading potential performance improvement projects, taking both an appreciative inquiry (AI) and a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) approach. Competency 2: Apply strategies to lead high-performing health care teams to meet organizational quality and safety goals. Synthesize stories and evidence about times when a care setting performed at its best with regard to quality and safety goals. Conduct a SWOT analysis of a care setting, with respect to quality and safety goals. Describe an area of concern identified in a SWOT analysis—relevant to a care setting’s mission, vision, and values—that should be improved. Compare the AI and SWOT approaches to analysis with regard to data gathering and interactions with others. Competency 3: Apply cultural, ethical, and regulatory considerations to leadership decision making. Propose positive, attainable quality and safety improvement goals for a care setting. Competency 5: Communicate with stakeholders and constituencies to build collaborative partnerships and create inclusive work environments. Communicate analyses clearly and in a way that demonstrates professionalism and respect for stakeholders and colleagues. Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.