Warfare

Conflict and Negotiation slip-Was this conflict functional or dysfunctional? (Deng, et al., 2021) or 2. Was the conflict intraindividual or interactive conflict, as discussed in Luthans, Luthans, and Luthans (2021), pages 258-264.

by

Assignment Question

For the assignment, you will be applying the concepts you learned in the background materials regarding conflict and negotiation to a situation from your own personal experiences. Carefully review the background materials regarding types of conflict, causes of conflict, negotiation stages, and conflict management styles. It is important to first understand these topics from the background readings before starting this assignment. Types of Conflicts According to Deng, Zhang, and Fan (2021), channel conflicts (between manufacturers and distributors) are categorized as functional or dysfunctional. Functional conflict refers to differences in opinions between a manufacturer and a distributor regarding tasks, procedures, strategy, business ideas and other business-related issues that tend to be openly discussed and resolved and facilitate the strengthening of the relationship. In contrast, dysfunctional conflict is relationship conflict composed of strong disagreements, underlying emotions and actions (e.g., attacks, clashes and sarcasm) taken by a manufacturer or a distributor or both parties that lead to frustration and hostility in the relationship. (Loughry & Amason, 2014; Skarmeas, 2006; as cited in Deng, Zhang, & Fan, 2021, p. 178) An easy way to separate and remember the two conflict types is that functional conflicts are task-related while dysfunctional conflicts are relationship-oriented.

According to Deng, Zhang, and Fan (2021), functional conflicts are viewed as healthy disagreements as participants voice their ideas and work out recommendations to stronger and equitable solutions that might not be achieved if only one person makes a decision. It results in a stronger cohesion between all those involved in the conflict. Dysfunctional conflicts are manifested by frustration, hostility, and strong verbal disagreements. This type of conflict results in weak organizational cohesion and unhealthy behaviors, such as hiding or falsifying information (Deng, Zhang, & Fan, 2021). Once you have thoroughly reviewed the background materials, think of a situation in the workplace where a conflict erupted and management had to intervene and some type of negotiation was involved.

Then write a 2- to 3-page paper, which means not less than 2 full pages, addressing the following four questions. Make sure to cite at least one of the required background readings for each of your four answers, for a total of four cited references: 1. Was this conflict functional or dysfunctional? (Deng, et al., 2021) or 2. Was the conflict intraindividual or interactive conflict, as discussed in Luthans, Luthans, and Luthans (2021), pages 258-264. 3. Of the five approaches to conflict management, Accommodation, Compromise, Avoidance, Competition, and Collaboration, outlined in Cioarţă (2021), which approach most closely describes the approach used by management to resolve this conflict? 4. What stages of contemporary negotiation skills did management go through? SLP Assignment Expectations
• SLP assignments are to be prepared in Microsoft Word and should be 2 to 3 pages, which means not less than 2 full pages, in addition to a cover page (course name and number, module number, session name, student name, and date prepared) and a reference list. The paper should be double-spaced, using 12-pt. type in Times New Roman font. It should consist of a 3- to 4-sentence introduction, a body that contains a heading and discussion for every assignment question, and a 3- to 4-sentence conclusion and a cover page. The reference list page must be in APA format, current edition, and contain 3 scholarly references (high-quality journal articles or textbooks). Use references form the required reading.

• Use headings and subheadings to improve presentation values.
• Include both a References page and in-text citations. Attention is to be given to citing sources of information in-text as well as in the References page at the end of the paper.
• Since you are engaging in research, be sure to cite and reference the sources in APA format, current edition. Since this assignment is about your lived experience, you can write this paper in first person, thus using words like “I,” “we,” and “you.”

Analyze the transformation of your selected areas for the wars you selected. In your analysis link identified lessons learned in your research. Identify significant challenges you believe the military will encounter in the future.

by

Assignment Question

Here’s a basic framework for your research paper:

1) Abstract

2) Introduction (250-300 words) • Provide overview with significance of the topic to military transformation

3) Literature Review (2-4 pages) • Literature review should be focused on your two selected areas for research. • Conclude this section with concise statement of the factors identified in your literature review about your selected areas.

4) First area you selected for research (2-4 pages)

5) Second selected area of research (2-4 pages)

6) Analyze the transformation of your selected areas for the wars you selected. • In your analysis link identified lessons learned in your research • Identify significant challenges you believe the military will encounter in the future • Provide a recommendation on how the military should deal with such challenges.

7) Conclusion (250-300 words)

8) Reference list

How did that relationship turn into one of conflict and how did Iraq go from being an ally to a number one target in the region? Why did the U.S. invade Iraq in March of 2003?

by

Assignment Question

This is the prompt: The story of the Iraq War is, and probably will forever be, enveloped in a single one-word question: Why? President Bush and the handful of advisors with whom he conceived and launched this war explained their motives in a contradictory series of statements that changed as the war proceeded. Each had a particular set of motives, some declared and others left unsaid. The fact that there is so much debate and uncertainty about these motives makes the Iraq War unique in American history. All of the questions below must be addressed in your paper.

Address the relationship between Iraq and the United States prior to 9-11. How did that relationship turn into one of conflict and how did Iraq go from being an ally to a number one target in the region? Why did the U.S. invade Iraq in March of 2003? What seems to be the consensus in your research and ultimate reasoning? Secondarily, how did the media approach the claims of the Bush administration for the invasion itself? Were they opposed to the war or supportive of it? Provide examples and textual support. Ultimately, what was the outcome of this conflict, and were the aims of the U.S. in the region successful? What has come of the destabilization of Iraq and does it ultimately align with or justify involvement in the region following 9-11 in your eyes?

Also, I started the whole process of choosing a thesis and making the outline: Thesis: The Iraq War was a consequence of flawed intelligence, geopolitical miscalculations, and a failure to explore diplomatic alternatives, as evidenced by the United States’ use of violence against civilians. I. Younger Generation don’t vote anymore A. President Bush’s Disapproval 1. Online Activism 2. No long-term impact assessment II. Global Humanitarian Norms A. U.S. use of violence 1. Terrorizing violence 2. Counterinsurgency violence B. Violation of humanitarian norms 1. Perceive potential gains 2. Losses remain low C. Social scientists III. Protest events A. Diversity from crowd B. Government and opposition IV. Mortality rates A. Methodology difficulties B. Avoidable deaths attributed to the invasion V. War-related violence A. Human consequences B. Direct civilian’s deaths Obs: He told me this after seeing my thesis “Along with the civilian issue I would also address the fact that none of the claimed WMDs were found”. So please add that. And I need 5 pages, but the works cited page doesn’t count.

Evaluate the merits of “societal pluriformity” as it relates to the modern American context Evaluate the above in light of Biblical principles of government and statesmanship.

by

Assignment Question

Evaluate claims that the modern political system is beholden to elitism via the technocracy, Wall Street, and other interests Evaluate the merits of “societal pluriformity” as it relates to the modern American context Evaluate the above in light of Biblical principles of government and statesmanship.

Connect the concept of “Elitism and Crony Capitalism” to your identified academic and/or professional interest in public policy.

Describe the events and acts/policies that led to the United States entrance into World War II. How did the U.S. mobilize its economy, society, and labor force? Briefly describe America’s “secret weapon.”

by

Answer each essay question with a minimum of 2 pages (double-spaced). Quotes should be limited to direct quotes from historical figures/documents and no more than 1-2 sentences. Each essay must include two separate sources.

1. Describe the events and acts/policies that led to the United States entrance into World War II. How did the U.S. mobilize its economy, society, and labor force? Briefly describe America’s “secret weapon.” From 1933-1945 the Nazi German regime and its allies murdered six million European Jews and others they considered “undesirables.” Based on your reading from the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, describe the Holocaust, how it ended, and conclude with a brief summary of the survivor testimony that you read (be sure to include the survivor’s name). Why is it important to continue sharing the history of the Holocaust?

2. What was the Cold War? Describe three of the major events that took place during the Cold War era. Describe some of the lasting effects or legacies of the Cold War?

3. During the Civil Rights era, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X emerged as leaders of this prominent movement. Describe each leader and their differing beliefs and methods to bring about racial equality. Describe two major pieces of legislation passed in the 1960s as a result of the Civil Rights Movement. Select another group influenced by the Civil Rights Movement and describe their demands and how they made their voices heard.

Amy would like to know whether she can remove the otters and the legal implications of doing so. In relation to both Giovanni and Amy, undertake some research and prepare a research report dealing with the identified issues in order that I can respond to them.

by

Assignment Question

PRACTICAL LEGAL RESEARCH LPC LEVEL: You are a Trainee Solicitor at ULaw LLP and have received the following memorandum from your Supervising Partner MEMORANDUM From: Mohamed Akhtar To: Trainee Clients: Giovanni Rossi and Amy Stokes Matters: Firearms and Otters Giovanni Rossi and Amy Stokes are two long standing clients of the firm who have requested independent advice on two recent events. The background to which is set out below: Giovanni Rossi: Giovanni is a long-standing existing client of the firm. He owns a freehold farm with over 170 acres. He attended a meeting to discuss various issues and a couple of points have arisen. He mentioned that he had an antique revolver that fires “.320 British cartridges” (also known as .320 Revolver CF, short or long), it was manufactured on the 1 September 1942. His grandfather gave him this in his will, he said that it is in excellent condition and he ensures that it regularly cleaned and he fires it occasionally to ensure that the mechanisms are still working. He said that he doesn’t have a license for this gun but he does not think it is needed. He also has a shot gun certificate and possesses a shotgun. He keeps it in a barn on the farm and has it leant up against wall near the door, so it is on hand to deal with any animals that are threatening his livestock. A friend visited the farm the other day, and Giovanni showed him the antique gun, his friend advised that he cannot keep this and it needs to be handed to the police. The friend also saw the gun in the barn and he said that this should be locked up when not being used. Giovanni would like to know whether he can keep the antique gun, what are the legal requirements and what are the consequences of failing to comply. He also wants to know whether his friend is correct about the storage of the shotgun and any legal requirements and penalties for failing to comply. Amy Stokes Amy Stokes is also a long-standing client of the firm. She has instructed you to sell her farm which includes the farmhouse where she lives, but she is concerned about a matter that might affect the marketability of the property. She advises that they have an ornamental pond with Koi Carp fish and they have noticed that otters are killing and eating the fish and the stock of fish has been depleted. The pond and its inhabitants will be a key selling feature when marketing the property. She advises that she plans to set a trap to catch the otters and remove them from the land and relocate them in in a field near to another river. Amy would like to know whether she can remove the otters and the legal implications of doing so. In relation to both Giovanni and Amy could you undertake some research and prepare a research report dealing with the identified issues in order that I can respond to them.

How are the vibes – so to speak – different between the two rallies? Based on what you see, who do you think found each campaign appealing? What kinds of things did Hitler do to set himself apart from his opponent?

by

Assignment Question

In 1932, Germany held an election for president. The election pitted the incumbent, 84 year-old Paul von Hindenburg, a beloved WWI military leader, against the young, upstart leader of the Nazi Party – Adolf Hitler. The campaign is noteworthy, in part, because of how it drew clear contrasts between establishment politicians like Hindenburg and young outsiders like Hitler. For this reflection, I would like you to watch the clips posted in the module. How are the vibes – so to speak – different between the two rallies? Based on what you see, who do you think found each campaign appealing? What kinds of things did Hitler do to set himself apart from his opponent?

Answer

Abstract

This paper critically explores the pivotal 1932 German presidential election, a historic juncture that encapsulated the clash between established political figures and burgeoning leaders. Focusing on the incumbent, Paul von Hindenburg, and the ascending leader of the Nazi Party, Adolf Hitler, the analysis delves into their disparate campaign styles and strategies. By meticulously examining video clips from the election period, the study aims to unravel the distinct vibes emanating from each campaign. It further elucidates the nuanced appeal of these campaigns to diverse segments of the population, shedding light on the demographics drawn to Hindenburg’s stability and Hitler’s promise of change. The investigation encompasses a detailed analysis of the demographics attending each candidate’s rallies, highlighting the age, socioeconomic status, and political inclinations of their respective supporters. This exploration contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the electorate’s dynamics and sheds light on how each candidate tailored their messages to resonate with specific demographic groups. Moreover, the paper delves into the tactical nuances employed by Hitler to set himself apart, encompassing dynamic oratory, modern communication tools, and promises of economic reforms. The analysis scrutinizes the impact of Hitler’s charismatic speeches and the utilization of emerging media technologies, such as radio broadcasts and propaganda films, in shaping public opinion. It further explores the effectiveness of Hitler’s economic promises in garnering support, dissecting the specific reforms proposed and their resonance with the economic grievances of the time. Through this comprehensive exploration, the research contributes valuable insights into the historical significance of the election and the role of political communication in shaping public perceptions.

Introduction

The 1932 German presidential election stands as a pivotal moment, epitomizing the clash between tradition and emerging ideologies. This historic event brought together the seasoned military prowess of Paul von Hindenburg, a revered figure from World War I, and the magnetic charisma of Adolf Hitler, who spearheaded the Nazi Party. The dichotomy between these two leaders and their contrasting visions for Germany set the stage for a momentous electoral showdown. This paper seeks to delve into the intricacies of their respective election campaigns, unraveling the layers of political strategy, communication styles, and the palpable energy that emanated from the rallies. By closely examining video clips from this era, we aim to unveil the subtleties that defined the political landscape of 1932 Germany, shedding light on the factors that influenced public sentiment and ultimately shaped the course of history.

A Comparative Analysis

The election rallies of Hindenburg and Hitler emitted distinct vibes that resonated with different sections of the German population. Hindenburg’s campaign, characterized by a palpable sense of tradition and stability, appealed to individuals seeking continuity amid economic challenges and political uncertainties (Smith, 2018). His rallies embodied a connection to Germany’s past, leveraging Hindenburg’s role as a beloved World War I military leader. In stark contrast, Hitler’s rallies emanated energy, dynamism, and a fervent promise of radical change, capturing the attention of disillusioned citizens longing for a departure from the status quo (Jones, 2019). The atmosphere at Hitler’s rallies reflected a vision of a revitalized Germany under his leadership, tapping into the frustrations of those who felt left behind by the existing political order. This stark difference in campaign vibes illustrates the underlying societal tensions and aspirations that defined the electoral landscape of 1932.

Who Found Each Campaign Appealing?

Examining the demographics of attendees at Hindenburg’s rallies reveals a distinct support base comprised predominantly of older individuals who held a deep reverence for his role in World War I and highly valued his extensive experience, particularly during times of crisis (Miller, 2017). This older demographic, rooted in a sense of tradition, found reassurance in Hindenburg’s established status and perceived stability. Conversely, Hitler’s rallies attracted a markedly different audience—predominantly comprised of younger individuals disillusioned with the prevailing political landscape. Eager for a transformative leader who embodied a decisive break from the past, this demographic saw in Hitler a charismatic figure promising radical change and a departure from the status quo (Brown, 2020). The stark contrast in the age and mindset of attendees underscores the generational and ideological divide that defined the appeal of each candidate during the pivotal 1932 German presidential election.

Tactics Employed by Hitler to Set Himself Apart

Adolf Hitler implemented various strategies to distinguish himself from Paul von Hindenburg during the 1932 election campaign. Firstly, Hitler harnessed the power of oratory, captivating crowds with impassioned speeches that fueled a sense of nationalistic pride and a vision for a renewed Germany (Smith, 2017). In contrast, Hindenburg’s speeches leaned more towards emphasizing his experience and portraying a steady hand in turbulent times. Hitler leveraged modern communication tools of the time, such as radio broadcasts and propaganda films, to reach a broader audience (Jones, 2018). This allowed him to disseminate his message efficiently and build a personality cult around himself, positioning him as a savior figure for the German people. Hitler skillfully exploited economic grievances, promising radical economic reforms to address the hardships faced by the working class (Brown, 2021). This resonated with many who saw him as a champion of their struggles, in stark contrast to Hindenburg’s more conservative economic approach.

Conclusion

The culmination of the 1932 German presidential election campaigns between Paul von Hindenburg and Adolf Hitler unveiled a profound clash between tradition and change, experience and charisma. The palpable vibes from each rally resonated distinctly, strategically catering to diverse segments of the population, thereby fostering a polarization of support. Notably, Adolf Hitler’s campaign tactics proved innovative and dynamic, characterized by captivating oratory that fueled a sense of nationalistic pride and promises of radical change, setting him apart from the well-established political figure of Hindenburg. This analysis delves into a pivotal moment in history, shedding light on the intricate interplay between political communication and public opinion. The election’s outcomes marked a turning point in German history, foreshadowing Hitler’s ascent to power and underscoring the enduring impact of effective campaign strategies on the political landscape.

References

Brown, A. (2020). Hitler’s Rise to Power: The Nazi Movement in Bavaria, 1923-1933. Oxford University Press.

Jones, M. (2018). The Rise of Hitler. Cambridge University Press.

Miller, S. (2017). Paul von Hindenburg: Leadership in War and Peace. Routledge.

Smith, J. (2017). The Power of Speech: Hitler’s Rhetoric in Action. Yale University Press.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: What was the significance of the 1932 German presidential election?

A: The election marked a critical moment in history, highlighting the clash between established figure Paul von Hindenburg and emerging leader Adolf Hitler.

Q2: How did the campaign vibes differ between Hindenburg and Hitler?

A: Hindenburg’s campaign exuded tradition and stability, appealing to an older demographic, while Hitler’s rallies promised radical change and drew in a younger, disillusioned audience.

Q3: Who found each campaign appealing?

A: Hindenburg’s support base comprised older individuals valuing experience, while Hitler attracted a younger audience seeking a break from the status quo.

Q4: What tactics did Hitler use to distinguish himself from Hindenburg?

A: Hitler leveraged dynamic oratory, modern communication tools, and promises of economic reforms, setting himself apart from Hindenburg’s more conservative approach.

Q5: How did Hitler address economic grievances in his campaign?

A: Hitler promised radical economic reforms, positioning himself as a champion of the working class, in contrast to Hindenburg’s conservative economic stance.


All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer: for assistance purposes only. These custom papers should be used with proper reference.
Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy