Demonstrate a critical awareness of research-based frameworks about learning,
Apply their understanding of learning to analyze case studies and their own learning experiences, LO 5. Use feedback (feedforward) to improve learning. Purpose: Research from the National Research Council demonstrates the importance of metacognition for learning- Reflecting on your learning- on both the products and the process of learning. This assignment pushes students to reflect on their learning in the course. Given learning teams learning during this course, we realize that students in their first year of university need a bit more structure, so we are providing a structured option for this assignment.
I made a list of what would best demonstrate your learning from this course and I cam e up with 4 questions. Students can choose to answer the questions or to do the open reflection. The rubric is the same. Structured Option Original Option Learning communities: Throughout this course, the instructors and TAs attempted to create a learning community to support students.
Analyze how technology was used to build this community and its success. Readings from weeks 7, 10, & 11 are essential to this question; other connections are possible. Affordances of the Technologies:
Which technologies in this course most supported your learning and why? Discuss the affordances in terms of the readings in weeks 10 & 11. Other connections are possible. Understanding features of educational materials that support learning: In tutorial 2, I asked the class what features of the Dirksen reading made it engaging and effective. Very few students answered. Now at the end of the course, I challenge students again to determine what features support learning. Choose TWO different MATERIALS from the course and analyze them in terms of learning research and theories (see week 4, Video V4b for information on some key learning theories). Examples of materials include the APA quiz, the academic integrity quiz, any of the videos, and the first chapter of Dirksen (2015). Understanding features of educational activities that support learning: Question 4 is similar to question 3, except it asks you to choose TWO different ACTIVITIES from the course and analyze them in terms of learning research and theories (week 4, Video V4b).
Analyzing what made these effective learning activities will help you choose effective learning activities in your future teaching endeavors. ACTIVITIES include: Working collaboratively to understand the different types of learning in a Google Doc, working in PerusAll, collaboratively creating a mind map, Chat waterfalls in Zoom… A reflection on your learning about learning (and factors leading to that learning) The key questions are: What are your key learnings about learning, and what COURSE experiences contributed to that learning?
How did technology impact your learning (be specific), and how is this explained by research and theory? You can include experiences outside the course, but you must include course experiences! The expectation is that you will include course readings and viewings (the async activities) A Useful Strategy This type of reflective assignment is more difficult than it appears at first glance. A useful strategy is to keep a reflective log where you reflect at least weekly about your learning and factors that influence your learning in asynchronous, tutorial, and homework activities. This provides detailed information and data that you can then mold into a coherent, detailed response when the assignment is due.
Rubric Reflecting on Learning Reflecting on Learning Criteria Ratings This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConnections between Student’s course Experiences and Course Concepts Success Criteria for Good: Reflection makes connections between student’s experiences in this course and learning research and theory with considerable detail. This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology Success Criteria for Good: Reflection connects student’s learning experiences in the course with concepts from research and theory with good detail. This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication Success Criteria for Good: Reflection is clearly organized around main ideas, which are supported by sufficient detail to clearly illustrate each main idea. This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCiting and Referencing Course Readings & Viewings Success Criteria for Good: Analyzes are supported with in-text citations and references in APA7 with few errors. Considerable course readings and viewings are cited.
- What variation in the number and kind of aggression (e.g. physical, relational, manipulative, etc.) did you observe?
- Write a research paper outlining the five main purposes of case management.
- Write a research paper that examines root cause analysis and affinity diagrams.
- What questions do you have for your faculty member and course colleagues about publishing your research and the DTP Workshop?
- Write a research paper outlining the significance of observing both verbal and nonverbal cues in conversation.
- Write a research report addressing the question: Is metformin (intervention) a more effective way to manage type 2 diabetes in older people (population) than chlorpropamide (comparator)?
- Compose a study describing how to handle a challenge in a presentation.
- Write a research paper that examines the Intelligence Case Study “Colin Powell’s speech at the United Nations on February 5, 2003.”
- Write a research paper on the interactions and overlaps between leadership and communications.
- Write a research paper on the topic of student-centered learning facilitation.