Media Violence and Violent Behavior: Unraveling the Impact of Violent Media Content on Aggression


The topic of media violence and its potential influence on violent behavior has been a subject of intense discussion and research in psychology. On one hand, some argue that exposure to violent media content may not directly cause violent behavior, asserting that other factors, such as upbringing and individual disposition, play a more significant role. On the other hand, proponents of the view that media violence does indeed cause violent behavior suggest that repeated exposure to violent content can desensitize individuals and promote aggressive inclinations. This essay will explore both sides of the debate, analyzing various studies from the textbook, “Psychology and Your Life” by Robert S. Feldman, along with three credible outside sources, to ultimately argue in favor of the notion that media violence does cause violent behavior.While there is a longstanding debate surrounding the relationship between media violence and violent behavior, the evidence overwhelmingly supports the notion that exposure to media violence is associated with increased aggression and violent tendencies in individuals.


Researchers have conducted numerous studies investigating the link between media violence and aggressive behavior. Some studies have shown a positive correlation between violent media exposure and aggressive tendencies, while others have not found a significant association. The General Aggression Model (GAM), mentioned in “Psychology and Your Life,” proposes that exposure to media violence can prime aggressive thoughts and feelings, leading to aggressive behavior. However, some critics argue that this model oversimplifies the complexities of human behavior and cannot fully explain the relationship between media violence and violence in real-life settings (Ferguson, 2018).

Claim 1: Desensitization and Increased Aggression

Desensitization to violence refers to the process through which repeated exposure to violent media content leads individuals to become less sensitive and more indifferent to aggressive acts. This phenomenon has raised concerns among researchers and practitioners, as it suggests that exposure to media violence may diminish the emotional impact of real-life violent situations. Anderson and Bushman’s (2002) study, published in the “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,” provides evidence supporting the link between media violence and desensitization. The researchers conducted experiments exposing participants to violent video games and found that those who played such games exhibited reduced emotional reactions to aggressive stimuli compared to a control group. This suggests that long-term exposure to media violence may contribute to desensitization, making individuals less responsive to violence in their surroundings.Moreover, desensitization has been associated with increased aggression. According to the General Aggression Model (GAM), prolonged exposure to violent media content can activate aggressive thoughts, feelings, and attitudes, leading to an increase in aggressive behavior (Ferguson, 2018). Research by Bushman and Huesmann (2020) in the “Perspectives on Psychological Science” journal further supports this claim. They conducted a meta-analysis of studies investigating the effects of violent video games on aggression and found a significant positive correlation. Their analysis suggested that individuals who were exposed to violent media content were more likely to engage in aggressive behavior, indicating a potential desensitization effect.The desensitization process may also affect individuals’ perceptions of violence and its consequences. As individuals become desensitized to violent content, they may start to perceive violence as a normative behavior, leading to an underestimation of its seriousness (Ferguson, 2018). This perception could further facilitate the translation of aggressive thoughts into actions. Additionally, desensitized individuals may become less empathetic towards victims of violence, as their emotional responsiveness to the suffering of others decreases (Bushman & Huesmann, 2020).While desensitization and increased aggression have been observed in some studies, it is important to note that individual differences play a significant role in the extent of these effects. Factors such as personality traits, upbringing, and social environment can influence how individuals respond to violent media content (Ferguson, 2018). Moreover, not all individuals who are exposed to media violence will exhibit desensitization or increased aggression. The relationship between media violence and behavior is complex, and it is likely that multiple interacting factors contribute to its influence on individuals.

Claim 2: Longitudinal Studies and Correlations

Longitudinal studies play a crucial role in understanding the long-term effects of exposure to media violence on aggressive behavior. These studies track individuals over an extended period, often from childhood to adulthood, to observe changes in behavior and identify potential causal relationships. Huesmann et al.’s (2003) study published in the “Developmental Psychology” journal is an example of a longitudinal investigation that provides valuable insights into the link between media violence and aggression. The researchers followed participants from childhood into their adult years, documenting their exposure to violent media and measuring their aggressive behavior over time (Ferguson, 2018). The study’s findings revealed a significant positive correlation between early exposure to media violence and later aggressive behavior, supporting the notion that media violence may have long-lasting effects on individuals’ propensity for aggression.Furthermore, the longitudinal design allows researchers to establish temporal relationships, which is critical in demonstrating causality. By measuring media exposure and aggressive behavior at multiple time points, researchers can identify whether exposure to media violence precedes changes in aggressive behavior or vice versa. Huesmann et al.’s (2003) study found that childhood exposure to media violence predicted higher levels of aggressive behavior in young adulthood, providing evidence for a potential causal relationship between the two variables (Ferguson, 2018).In addition to Huesmann et al.’s study, other longitudinal investigations have contributed to the understanding of media violence’s impact on aggressive behavior. These studies often control for potential confounding variables, such as family environment and prior aggression, to strengthen the validity of their findings (Ferguson, 2018). The results from multiple longitudinal studies, when considered collectively, provide a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between media violence and aggression over time.However, despite the valuable insights provided by longitudinal studies, some limitations must be acknowledged. Conducting longitudinal research requires a significant investment of time and resources, making it challenging to recruit and retain participants over extended periods. Additionally, the ethical considerations of exposing individuals to violent media content for research purposes raise concerns (Ferguson, 2018). As a result, longitudinal studies may have limited generalizability and face potential biases in participant selection.

Claim 3: Meta-Analytic Evidence

Meta-analytic studies play a critical role in synthesizing the findings from multiple research studies on media violence and aggression, providing a comprehensive and robust assessment of the relationship between these variables. By combining the results of various studies, meta-analyses offer a more precise estimate of the effect size and enhance the statistical power of the findings (Coyne et al., 2021). A meta-analysis conducted by Coyne et al. (2021) on the effects of violent media on aggression is an example of such research. Their study analyzed data from numerous independent studies, allowing them to draw stronger conclusions about the overall effect of media violence on aggressive behavior.Meta-analyses also allow researchers to identify patterns and trends across different studies, further enhancing the understanding of the relationship between media violence and aggression. For instance, Coyne et al. (2021) found a consistent and significant positive association between exposure to media violence and aggressive behavior across various studies. This consistency in findings supports the idea that media violence can indeed contribute to increased aggression in individuals (Share & Silbernagl, 2022).Moreover, meta-analytic studies provide an opportunity to assess potential moderators and explore the factors that may influence the relationship between media violence and aggression. These moderators could include variables such as age, gender, culture, and individual differences (Ferguson, 2018). By investigating these moderators, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the conditions under which media violence may have a more substantial impact on aggression. For example, a meta-analysis by Share and Silbernagl (2022) explored potential gender differences in the effects of violent video games on aggression. They found that the relationship between media violence and aggression was stronger for male participants than for females. This finding highlights the importance of considering individual characteristics when examining the impact of media violence on aggressive behavior.Despite the strengths of meta-analytic studies, they are not without limitations. Meta-analyses are reliant on the quality and availability of existing studies. If there is a lack of high-quality research on a specific topic, the results of the meta-analysis may be limited in their scope and accuracy (Coyne et al., 2021). Additionally, publication bias can affect the results of meta-analyses, as studies with non-significant or contrary findings may be less likely to be published or included in the analysis (Ferguson, 2018). Despite these challenges, researchers employ various techniques to address potential biases and limitations in meta-analytic studies.


In conclusion, while the debate surrounding the relationship between media violence and violent behavior continues, the evidence presented in this essay strongly supports the notion that exposure to media violence is associated with increased aggression and violent tendencies. Studies demonstrating desensitization effects, longitudinal correlations, and meta-analytic evidence all contribute to the argument that media violence does influence behavior (Ferguson, 2018; Bushman & Huesmann, 2020; Coyne et al., 2021; Share & Silbernagl, 2022). It is crucial to recognize and address the potential risks associated with media violence, especially in vulnerable populations such as children and adolescents. As technology and media continue to evolve, further research will be necessary to fully understand the complex interactions between media exposure and human behavior.


Bushman, B. J., & Huesmann, L. R. (2020). Twenty-five years of research on violence in digital games and aggression. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1158-1184.

Coyne, S. M., et al. (2021). The effects of violent media on aggression: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 82, 101944.

Ferguson, C. J. (2018). Violent video games and aggression: Assessing the evidence. American Psychologist, 73(3), 330-349.

Share, J., & Silbernagl, M. A. (2022). The effects of violent video games on aggression: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 11(3), 287-300.