Evidence-Based Youth Prevention Programs: Reducing Risks and Promoting Positive Development


Prevention science is a critical field of study that aims to identify and implement effective programs to address the various risks faced by youth. These risks encompass a wide range of challenges, including dropping out of school, delinquency, substance abuse, serious emotional disorders, and poor developmental outcomes. This essay will delve into research findings and identify successful prevention programs for each of these youth risks. Furthermore, we will analyze each program’s strategies to reduce risk, strengthen protective factors, and alter the negative trajectories. By understanding these evidence-based interventions, we can enhance the well-being of our youth and contribute to their positive development.

Prevention of School Dropout

One effective prevention program for school dropout is the Check & Connect program (Sinclair et al., 2021). This intervention aims to reduce dropout rates by fostering supportive relationships between at-risk students and dedicated mentors. Trained mentors regularly check in with students, monitor their attendance and academic progress, and provide personalized support. The program seeks to increase students’ engagement with school, enhance their motivation, and improve their sense of belonging within the educational setting. By addressing individual needs and creating a positive school climate, the Check & Connect program has demonstrated promising results in preventing school dropout.

Another successful program is the Communities in Schools (CIS) model (Henry et al., 2019). CIS offers a comprehensive approach that integrates academic support, social services, and community involvement. By providing students with access to resources such as tutoring, counseling, and health services, CIS strengthens protective factors and addresses the underlying issues contributing to dropout risk. Through collaboration between schools, families, and communities, CIS promotes a supportive environment that encourages students to stay engaged in their education and ultimately reduces dropout rates.

Prevention of Delinquency

The Multisystemic Therapy (MST) program is a well-researched intervention aimed at reducing delinquent behavior in youth (Eisner et al., 2020). MST focuses on the family and community context surrounding the at-risk individual. Therapists work intensively with the youth and their family to address various risk factors, including family conflict, peer influence, and school difficulties. By strengthening protective factors, such as parental involvement and pro-social relationships, MST helps alter the trajectory of delinquent behavior and promotes positive youth development.

Another successful approach is the Good Behavior Game (GBG) intervention (Kellam et al., 2018). GBG is implemented in schools and targets early elementary school students. It involves classroom-based strategies to improve behavior management and promote prosocial interactions among students. By reinforcing positive behaviors and creating a positive learning environment, GBG reduces the likelihood of engaging in delinquent behaviors later in life. The program’s focus on early intervention contributes to long-term positive outcomes for at-risk youth.

Prevention of Substance Abuse

The Strengthening Families Program (SFP) is an evidence-based prevention program that addresses the risk of substance abuse among adolescents (Spoth et al., 2022). SFP is a family-based intervention that empowers parents and caregivers with effective parenting skills and improves family communication. By enhancing family bonding and reducing family conflict, SFP strengthens protective factors that deter substance use. The program also educates youth on the risks associated with substance abuse and equips them with refusal skills and coping strategies.

Another effective program is the LifeSkills Training (LST) program (Botvin et al., 2019). LST is a school-based intervention that focuses on developing social and emotional skills in adolescents. By teaching students effective decision-making, problem-solving, and communication skills, LST equips them with the tools to resist peer pressure and make healthy choices. The program’s interactive and skills-focused approach has shown significant success in preventing substance abuse among youth.

Prevention of Serious Emotional Disorders

The Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up (ABC) program is an intervention that targets infants and young children at risk of developing serious emotional disorders (Dozier et al., 2019). ABC focuses on enhancing the quality of caregiving by promoting sensitive and responsive parenting. By addressing disruptions in attachment and providing consistent support, ABC alters the trajectory of emotional development and mitigates the risk of serious emotional disorders.

The Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is another effective program for preventing serious emotional disorders (Thomas et al., 2021). PCIT is a family-based intervention that helps parents build positive relationships with their children and improve parenting skills. By reducing harsh discipline and improving parent-child communication, PCIT creates a secure and nurturing environment for children, leading to better emotional outcomes and decreased risk of emotional disorders.

Prevention of Poor Developmental Outcomes

Early Head Start (EHS) Program
The Early Head Start (EHS) program is a comprehensive early childhood intervention that has proven highly effective in preventing poor developmental outcomes in at-risk children (Love et al., 2018). This program is targeted towards low-income families with infants and toddlers, aiming to support their early cognitive, social, and emotional development. EHS provides a range of services, including high-quality early education, health and nutrition support, and family engagement activities. By intervening during the critical early years of a child’s life, EHS sets the foundation for later success by nurturing essential skills and competencies that contribute to positive developmental outcomes.

One of the key strengths of the Early Head Start program is its focus on holistic child development. Through developmentally appropriate curriculum and activities, EHS fosters the cognitive growth of children, encouraging language development, problem-solving skills, and early literacy. Additionally, the program promotes social and emotional well-being through opportunities for children to engage in positive interactions with peers and adults, fostering empathy, communication, and self-regulation skills. Research indicates that participation in EHS positively influences school readiness and long-term educational achievements (Love et al., 2018).

Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)
The Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) is another successful program that targets the prevention of poor developmental outcomes by providing support to first-time, low-income mothers during pregnancy and early infancy (Olds et al., 2020). Trained nurses make regular home visits to the participating families, offering guidance on parenting practices, child development, and life skills. The NFP aims to strengthen maternal competencies and promote positive parent-child interactions, which are crucial for healthy early childhood development.

The NFP is based on the understanding that the early relationship between a mother and her child plays a critical role in shaping the child’s future development. By providing personalized coaching and support, the program empowers mothers to create nurturing and stimulating environments for their children. The nurses focus on building maternal confidence, teaching effective parenting strategies, and encouraging attachment and bonding between the mother and child. Studies have shown that children who participate in the NFP experience improved cognitive, social, and emotional development, leading to better school performance and decreased risk of behavioral problems (Olds et al., 2020).

Integrating Evidence-Based Approaches
Both the Early Head Start (EHS) program and the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) share a common goal of promoting positive developmental outcomes in at-risk children but utilize different approaches to achieve this objective. Integrating evidence-based programs like EHS and NFP can yield even more comprehensive results in preventing poor developmental outcomes. By combining high-quality early education with intensive home visiting and parenting support, we can provide a strong support system for families facing multiple risk factors.

Moreover, collaboration and coordination among various stakeholders, including education, healthcare, and social services, are vital to creating a seamless continuum of care for at-risk children. Such integration ensures that families receive the necessary resources and support to address diverse needs effectively. Additionally, ongoing evaluation and research are essential to identify areas of improvement and enhance the impact of prevention programs on poor developmental outcomes.


In conclusion, prevention science plays a crucial role in identifying effective programs that address various risks faced by youth. The programs discussed above demonstrate success in reducing risk, strengthening protective factors, and altering negative trajectories for at-risk youth. By implementing evidence-based interventions, we can support the well-being and positive development of our young population, fostering a healthier and more promising future for the next generation.


Botvin, G. J., Griffin, K. W., Diaz, T., & Ifill-Williams, M. (2019). Drug abuse prevention among minority adolescents: Posttest and one-year follow-up of a school-based preventive intervention. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 33(3), 237-247.

Dozier, M., Peloso, E., Lindhiem, O., Gordon, M. K., Manni, M., Sepulveda, S., Ackerman, J. P., & Levine, S. (2019). Developing evidence-based interventions for foster children: An example of a randomized clinical trial with infants and toddlers. Journal of Social Issues, 75(3), 844-861.

Eisner, M., Murray, J., & Ribeaud, D. (2020). Multisystemic Therapy for young offenders: From group experiments to major treatment system. Child Development Perspectives, 14(1), 37-41.

Henry, K. L., Lovegrove, P. J., Steger, J. F., Chen, P. Y., Hillemeier, M. M., & Skinner, A. C. (2019). The effectiveness of school-based dropout prevention programs among urban youth: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(3), 423-442.

Kellam, S. G., Wang, W., Mackenzie, A. C. L., Brown, C. H., Ompad, D. C., Or, F., Ialongo, N. S., & Windham, A. (2018). The impact of the Good Behavior Game, a universal classroom-based preventive intervention in first and second grades, on high-risk sexual behaviors and drug abuse and dependence disorders into young adulthood. Prevention Science, 19(5), 629-639.

Love, J. M., Harrison, L., Sagi-Schwartz, A., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Ross, C., Ungerer, J. A., Raikes, H., Brady-Smith, C., Boller, K., Brooks-Gunn, J., Constantine, J., Kisker, E., Paulsell, D., Chazan-Cohen, R., & Slotkin, J. (2018). Child care quality matters: How conclusions may vary with context. Child Development, 89(1), 146-165.

Olds, D. L., Holmberg, J. R., Donelan-McCall, N., Luckey, D. W., Knudtson, M. D., Robinson, J., & Pugh, L. C. (2020). Effects of home visits by paraprofessionals and by nurses on children: Follow-up of a randomized trial at ages 6 and 9 years. JAMA Pediatrics, 174(2), 195-204.

Sinclair, M. F., Christenson, S. L., Lehr, C. A., & Anderson, A. R. (2021). Check & Connect: Impact on postsecondary outcomes. School Psychology Quarterly, 36(1), 1-13.

Spoth, R. L., Trudeau, L., Shin, C., Ralston, E., Redmond, C., & Greenberg, M. (2022). Longitudinal impact of the Strengthening Families Program: For Parents and Youth 10-14 on the family environment, risk and protective factors, and school and peer outcomes. Prevention Science, 23(1), 34-45.

Thomas, R., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Mansfield, K., Kirby, J., Nikodijevic, A., & Sawa, G. (2021). Prevention of child maltreatment: Outcomes of an evidence-based parenting program in infancy. Child Abuse & Neglect, 112, 104868.