The Impact of Slavery, Cotton Trade, and Industrialization: Struggles for Dignity and Transformation

Thesis Statement

The Consequences of Slavery and the Cotton Trade during the Early Industrial Revolution: Exploring the Struggle for Human Dignity and Economic Transformation


The topic of slavery and the cotton trade during the early Industrial Revolution offers a compelling lens through which to examine the question of “What is Worth Fighting For?” This thesis explores the multifaceted consequences of these intertwined historical phenomena, shedding light on the struggle for human dignity and economic transformation. The analysis will be based on three main points: the dehumanizing impact of slavery, the role of cotton trade in fueling industrialization, and the emerging voices of abolition and labor rights. To support this thesis, primary sources such as slave narratives, economic records, and abolitionist writings will be essential. In addition, further research into the socio-economic effects of industrialization, global trade networks, and the evolution of labor movements will provide a comprehensive understanding of the historical context.

Main Point 1: Dehumanizing Impact of Slavery

One critical aspect worth fighting for was the recognition of the inherent dignity of all humans. The institution of slavery, driven by the demand for cotton labor, subjected countless individuals to dehumanizing conditions. Slave narratives provide vivid accounts of the physical and psychological trauma endured by enslaved individuals. Frederick Douglass, in his narrative, recounts the harrowing experiences of being treated as property and stripped of his identity (Douglass, 1845). Harriet Jacobs’ narrative reveals the deeply personal struggles of enslaved women, highlighting the degradation and abuse they faced (Jacobs, 1861). These narratives serve as powerful reminders of the brutality of slavery, prompting the question: How did the brutal treatment of enslaved individuals challenge the moral fabric of society and spark the fight for human rights?

The recognition of the dehumanizing impact of slavery was not only a moral imperative but also a catalyst for social change. As the horrors of slavery were exposed through narratives and abolitionist writings, an increasing number of individuals began to question the ethical basis of a system built upon exploitation. The works of prominent abolitionists, such as William Wilberforce and Sojourner Truth, articulated the shared belief that every human being deserved basic rights and freedom. This growing consciousness ignited discussions about the morality of slavery and the necessity of confronting this deeply entrenched practice. As such, the fight against slavery became intertwined with the fight for the recognition of human dignity, shaping the course of history.

Main Point 2: Role of Cotton Trade in Fueling Industrialization

The cotton trade played a pivotal role in driving early industrialization, making it another vital aspect worth fighting for. The demand for cotton to feed the mills of the Industrial Revolution spurred global trade networks and innovation in transportation. Economic records and trade statistics illustrate the enormous economic impact of cotton trade on various regions. For instance, documents from the British Board of Trade reveal the exponential growth of cotton imports and its contribution to the British economy (Board of Trade, 1830). By examining the economic transformation brought about by cotton, the essay addresses the question: How did the pursuit of economic prosperity shape societies’ priorities and contribute to the push for industrialization?

The cotton trade not only fueled economic growth but also had far-reaching social implications. The increased demand for cotton led to the expansion of plantations and the forced migration of enslaved laborers. This perpetuated the cycle of oppression and exploitation that slavery represented. Simultaneously, the industrialization of cotton production marked the emergence of a new economic order, one driven by the quest for profit and efficiency. The allure of economic prosperity clashed with the humanitarian concerns raised by the dehumanizing practices of the cotton industry. The clash between economic interests and ethical considerations gave rise to debates about the morality of profiting from a system built on human suffering. The struggle between economic interests and ethical values underscores the complexity of what was truly worth fighting for during this period of rapid change.

Main Point 3: Emerging Voices of Abolition and Labor Rights

A significant endeavor worth fighting for was the rise of abolitionist and labor rights movements. These movements challenged the status quo and sought to dismantle the institution of slavery while advocating for improved working conditions for laborers. Abolitionist writings provide insight into the growing opposition against exploitative practices. William Lloyd Garrison’s newspaper, “The Liberator,” features passionate articles advocating for the immediate abolition of slavery (Garrison, 1831). Samuel Gompers’ “What Does Labor Want?” articulates the demands of laborers for fair wages and better working conditions (Gompers, 1886). Exploring the evolution of these movements, the essay tackles the inquiry question: How did the efforts to abolish slavery and improve labor conditions reflect changing societal values and fuel the fight for justice?

The rise of abolitionist and labor rights movements marked a significant shift in public consciousness. Abolitionists recognized that the fight for human dignity extended beyond the boundaries of race and extended to all individuals subjected to injustice. The labor rights movement echoed this sentiment, as laborers demanded fair treatment and equitable compensation for their contributions to the rapidly industrializing society. The convergence of these movements challenged the existing power dynamics and advocated for a more just and inclusive society. The labor movement’s demand for better conditions and fair wages mirrored the abolitionist call for the end of a system that treated individuals as commodities. These intertwined movements demonstrated that the fight for justice and human rights was not limited to one specific cause but spanned various social and economic spheres.

Additional Research and Inquiry Question

To further develop the thesis and support the main points, additional research is needed in several areas. Investigating the interconnectedness of global trade networks and the transfer of goods, labor, and ideas across regions would enrich the analysis of the cotton trade’s impact. Additionally, exploring the socio-economic consequences of industrialization on both local and international levels would provide a comprehensive understanding of the transformations occurring during this period. The inquiry question that arises is: How did the convergence of global trade dynamics, economic shifts, and social activism contribute to shaping the historical trajectory of the fight for human dignity and economic change?

In conclusion, the intertwined histories of slavery, the cotton trade, and the early Industrial Revolution present a complex tapestry that raises the question of “What is Worth Fighting For?” This thesis asserts that the struggle for human dignity and economic transformation were central themes in this historical context. By examining the dehumanizing impact of slavery, the role of the cotton trade in industrialization, and the emergence of voices advocating for abolition and labor rights, the thesis aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the historical forces at play. Primary sources and further research into the economic, social, and ideological dimensions of these phenomena will contribute to a nuanced exploration of these crucial aspects of history.


Board of Trade. (1830). Statistical abstract for the several colonial and other possessions of the United Kingdom. HMSO.

Douglass, F. (1845). Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass, an American slave. Anti-Slavery Office.

Garrison, W. L. (1831). To the Public. The Liberator, 1(1), 1.

Gompers, S. (1886). What Does Labor Want? The American Federationist, 2(9), 589-592.

Jacobs, H. A. (1861). Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl. Thayer and Eldridge.

Comparative Analysis of “Twelve Years a Slave” Novel and Film Adaptation


The relationship between literature and film has been a subject of fascination for scholars and enthusiasts alike. Adaptations of literary works into cinematic experiences offer a unique opportunity to explore the transformation of narratives across different mediums. In this essay, we delve into the comparison between the novel “Twelve Years a Slave” by Solomon Northup and its movie adaptation directed by Steve McQueen. Published in 1853, “Twelve Years a Slave” is a poignant memoir recounting Northup’s harrowing experience as a free Black man who was kidnapped and sold into slavery. Released in 2013, the film adaptation brings Northup’s narrative to life on the silver screen. Through a comprehensive analysis of narrative structure, character development, and visual representation, this essay aims to examine the ways in which the film adaptation both captures the essence of the source material and introduces its own artistic interpretations.

Narrative Structure and Adaptation

The novel “Twelve Years a Slave” employs a first-person narrative, providing readers with direct insight into Solomon Northup’s thoughts, emotions, and experiences (Northup, 1853). The prose meticulously chronicles Northup’s journey from a life of freedom to one of unspeakable oppression. This narrative choice facilitates a deep connection between the reader and Northup’s ordeal, making the emotional impact of his story all the more profound.

The film adaptation, directed by Steve McQueen, grapples with the challenge of translating Northup’s internal monologue onto the screen. McQueen’s adaptation employs visual storytelling to convey Northup’s emotions and experiences. The absence of a first-person narrative necessitates a shift in focus, relying on actor Chiwetel Ejiofor’s portrayal of Northup to convey the character’s inner turmoil. This difference in narrative perspective is a crucial point of comparison between the two works.

In adapting the novel into a film, McQueen is tasked with condensing Northup’s 12-year journey into a manageable runtime while maintaining the essence of the narrative. This adaptation requires judicious editing, leading to the omission of certain events and nuances found in the novel. While some critics argue that the film simplifies the story’s complexity, others contend that the adaptation focuses on the most pivotal and emotionally charged moments, ensuring a powerful cinematic experience.

Character Development and Interpretation

In the novel, Northup’s personal growth and transformation are prominently displayed through his internal reflections. His resilience and determination to maintain his identity as a free man in the face of immense adversity are central themes. The reader witnesses Northup’s psychological evolution, portraying his struggle to preserve his humanity amid the dehumanizing institution of slavery.

The film adaptation faces the challenge of conveying character development through visual and performative means. Chiwetel Ejiofor’s portrayal of Northup encapsulates the internal turmoil and strength that define the character. McQueen’s interpretation relies on Ejiofor’s expressive performance, which captures Northup’s internal conflict and evolution through nuanced expressions and gestures.

Visual Representation and Artistic Interpretation

The visual medium of film offers unique opportunities for artistic interpretation, allowing directors to create a visual language that enhances the narrative’s impact. Steve McQueen utilizes visual symbolism and cinematography to communicate themes present in Northup’s memoir. The film’s visual aesthetics and somber color palette evoke the bleakness of Northup’s experiences and emphasize the stark contrast between his past life and his life in bondage.

The film adaptation introduces artistic liberties, such as changes in pacing and scene structure, to enhance dramatic tension and emotional resonance. For instance, the adaptation presents scenes of violence and cruelty more vividly, aiming to convey the brutality of slavery while ensuring that the audience remains emotionally engaged (McQueen, 2013).


In conclusion, the comparison between Solomon Northup’s novel “Twelve Years a Slave” and its film adaptation directed by Steve McQueen highlights the nuanced relationship between literature and film. While the novel employs a first-person narrative to delve into Northup’s internal thoughts, the film adaptation relies on visual storytelling and performative elements to convey his experiences. The character development in the novel is translated onto the screen through Chiwetel Ejiofor’s compelling performance, capturing the essence of Northup’s emotional journey. Moreover, the adaptation demonstrates how visual representation and artistic interpretation can enhance the narrative’s impact by utilizing cinematic techniques.

The comparison between the two works underscores the challenges and opportunities inherent in adapting literary works into film. While the film adaptation necessarily omits certain details and compresses the timeline, it manages to capture the heart-wrenching essence of Northup’s story. McQueen’s artistic choices, from cinematography to scene structure, contribute to the film’s emotional resonance and thematic depth.

In essence, the adaptation of “Twelve Years a Slave” exemplifies how the cinematic medium can reinterpret and amplify the power of a literary work. Northup’s narrative, originally penned in 1853, continues to resonate through its adaptation, demonstrating the enduring relevance of his story and the adaptability of narratives across different artistic mediums.


Northup, S. (1853). Twelve Years a Slave. Auburn: Derby and Miller.

McQueen, S. (Director). (2013). Twelve Years a Slave [Film]. Regency Enterprises.

The Enduring Psychological Impact of Slavery: Understanding Historical Trauma and Resilience in African American Communities


This research paper examines and compares the era of slavery to the Jim Crow era in terms of societal and individual oppression. The study delves into the historical contexts, institutional structures, and methods of oppression utilized during these periods. By analyzing the similarities and differences between slavery and the Jim Crow era, this paper aims to shed light on the enduring consequences of racial oppression in American history.


The era of slavery and the subsequent Jim Crow era were pivotal periods in American history characterized by deeply entrenched systems of racial oppression. While slavery involved the ownership and exploitation of African Americans as chattel, the Jim Crow era enforced racial segregation and discriminatory laws. This research paper compares and contrasts these two eras, examining the societal and individual oppression experienced by African Americans. By utilizing both primary and secondary sources, this study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the lasting impacts of these oppressive systems.

I. Historical Contexts and Institutional Structures


Slavery, a dark chapter in American history, had profound historical contexts and institutional structures that shaped the lives of African Americans for generations. Understanding the origins and establishment of slavery is crucial in comprehending the magnitude of societal and individual oppression endured by enslaved individuals. This section explores the historical contexts and institutional structures of slavery, shedding light on the foundations of this oppressive system.

Origins of Slavery in the American Colonies
The origins of slavery in the American colonies can be traced back to the early 17th century when the first enslaved Africans were brought to Jamestown, Virginia (Cannadine, 2018). Initially, slavery in the colonies was not confined to racial lines. However, as the demand for labor increased and the profitability of African enslavement became apparent, the institution of slavery became intertwined with racialized ideologies (Johnson, 2019). The introduction of laws that defined enslaved Africans as property and perpetuated the intergenerational enslavement of their offspring laid the groundwork for the dehumanization and systematic oppression that followed.

Role of Slavery in Shaping the American Economy and Society
Slavery played a significant role in shaping the American economy and society. The labor of enslaved Africans was instrumental in the establishment and growth of key industries such as agriculture, particularly in the southern colonies and later the southern states (Johnson, 2019). Enslaved individuals were subjected to grueling work on plantations, cultivating cash crops such as tobacco, rice, and, later, cotton. The profits generated from these crops fueled the economic expansion of the United States, providing a foundation for the country’s early development (Johnson, 2019).

Moreover, the institution of slavery had profound social and cultural impacts on American society. Slavery created a racial hierarchy, with white slave owners at the top and enslaved Africans at the bottom (Cannadine, 2018). This racial hierarchy perpetuated a system of power and privilege based on skin color, shaping social interactions, and reinforcing racial divisions within American society. The legacy of this hierarchical structure can still be felt today, as the consequences of slavery continue to influence social and economic disparities in the United States.

Institutional Structures of Slavery
The institutional structures of slavery were designed to maintain control over enslaved individuals and ensure their subjugation. Laws known as slave codes were implemented to regulate the behavior and movements of enslaved Africans (Cannadine, 2018). These codes stripped enslaved individuals of their basic human rights and enforced a strict system of control. Enslaved individuals were denied access to education, subjected to harsh punishments, and faced the constant threat of family separation through forced sales and auctions.

The institution of slavery also extended beyond the confines of individual plantations. Slavery was protected and reinforced by state and federal laws, including the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which required the return of escaped slaves to their owners, even if they had reached free states (Johnson, 2019). This legal framework further solidified the power of slave owners and perpetuated the oppression of enslaved individuals.

Furthermore, the economic interests of slave owners and their political influence led to the entrenchment of slavery as an institution. Southern states, heavily reliant on the labor of enslaved individuals, fought to protect and expand the institution through political measures such as the Three-Fifths Compromise and the Dred Scott decision, which affirmed the property rights of slave owners and denied the humanity and citizenship of enslaved Africans (Cannadine, 2018).

In conclusion, the historical contexts and institutional structures of slavery in the United States laid the foundation for the pervasive societal and individual oppression experienced by enslaved Africans. The origins of slavery in the American colonies, intertwined with racialized ideologies, set the stage for the dehumanization and exploitation of African Americans. The economic significance of slavery shaped the American economy and society, while the institutional structures, including slave codes and legal protections for slave owners, reinforced the systemic oppression of enslaved individuals. By examining these historical contexts and institutional structures, we gain a deeper understanding of the profound impacts of slavery on American history and the enduring consequences it has had on African American communities.

II. Methods of Societal and Individual Oppression


The era of slavery was characterized by a range of methods employed to enforce societal and individual oppression, allowing for the continued subjugation of African Americans. These methods served to maintain the power dynamics inherent in slavery and to ensure the control and submission of the enslaved population.

One of the key methods of oppression during slavery was the dehumanization and brutalization of enslaved individuals. Enslaved Africans and African Americans were stripped of their humanity, reduced to mere property, and denied their basic rights as human beings. They were subjected to physical abuse, including whippings, beatings, and other forms of punishment aimed at instilling fear and maintaining control (Johnson, 2019). This brutal treatment reinforced the power imbalance between slaveholders and the enslaved population.

Another method of oppression within slavery was the systematic denial of basic human rights. Enslaved individuals were denied access to education, restricted in their freedom of movement, and deprived of legal protections. The institution of slavery created a legal framework that treated enslaved individuals as property rather than as human beings with inherent rights and dignity (Cannadine, 2018). This denial of rights perpetuated the marginalization and vulnerability of African Americans within society.

The institution of slavery also had a profound impact on the family structure of enslaved individuals. Families were often torn apart through the sale and separation of enslaved individuals, disrupting the bonds of kinship and love. Slaveholders deliberately separated family members to exert control and prevent the formation of strong familial networks that could potentially challenge the system (Cannadine, 2018). This systematic destruction of African American families not only caused immense emotional trauma but also undermined the development of stable family units and community support systems.

Resistance to the oppressive system of slavery was met with severe consequences. Enslaved individuals who attempted to escape or rebel against their masters faced brutal punishments, including public floggings and even death. Slaveholders used these acts of violence as a means of maintaining control and instilling fear among the enslaved population (Johnson, 2019). The threat of punishment served as a deterrent and reinforced the power dynamic between slaveholders and the enslaved.

Despite the harsh conditions and constant oppression, enslaved individuals developed various forms of resistance and resilience. Some resisted through acts of rebellion, such as slave revolts or escapes via the Underground Railroad. These acts of defiance challenged the legitimacy of slavery and disrupted the established power structures (Johnson, 2019). Additionally, enslaved individuals often found ways to preserve their cultural heritage and forge supportive relationships within their communities, fostering a sense of identity and unity amidst their oppressive circumstances (Cannadine, 2018).

In summary, the era of slavery employed a range of methods to enforce societal and individual oppression. These included the dehumanization and brutalization of enslaved individuals, the denial of basic human rights, the systematic destruction of African American families, and the use of violence to suppress resistance. However, enslaved individuals also demonstrated resilience and resistance, striving to maintain their humanity and forge connections within their communities despite the oppressive conditions they endured.

III. Psychological and Emotional Impact


The era of slavery in the United States had profound psychological and emotional impacts on enslaved African Americans and their descendants. These effects continue to reverberate through generations, shaping the experiences and mental health of African American communities.

The experience of slavery inflicted severe psychological trauma on enslaved individuals. The constant threat of physical violence, separation from loved ones, and the denial of basic human rights contributed to a pervasive sense of fear, powerlessness, and despair (Johnson, 2019). Enslaved individuals lived in a state of constant anxiety, never knowing when they might face punishment or loss. This psychological distress was further intensified by the dehumanizing conditions of slavery, as enslaved individuals were denied dignity and agency (Granderson, 2021).

The trauma of slavery also had intergenerational effects, with psychological wounds passed down through generations. Enslaved individuals who survived slavery often struggled to rebuild their lives and regain a sense of identity and purpose. The trauma they experienced was transmitted to their children and grandchildren, shaping their psychological well-being and shaping their worldviews (Granderson, 2021). The legacy of slavery’s psychological impact can still be observed today in the higher rates of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder among African Americans.

Within the enslaved community, individuals developed various coping mechanisms to navigate the oppressive environment. These coping strategies were essential for survival and maintaining a sense of self and community. Practices such as storytelling, music, religion, and other cultural traditions served as outlets for emotional expression, preservation of cultural heritage, and sources of strength and resilience (Trent, 2018). These forms of resistance and self-preservation provided enslaved individuals with a sense of agency and solidarity amidst their oppressive circumstances.

Another significant psychological consequence of slavery was the internalization of racial inferiority. Enslaved individuals were subjected to constant messages of their inherent inferiority, both through explicit acts of dehumanization and societal norms that enforced white supremacy (Wade, 2020). This internalized racism led to the development of negative self-perceptions and limited aspirations among African Americans, contributing to a persistent struggle for self-worth and identity.

Despite the psychological and emotional burdens of slavery, African Americans also developed a spirit of resistance and resilience. From covert acts of rebellion to organized slave revolts, enslaved individuals asserted their humanity and fought against their oppressive conditions. These acts of resistance were crucial for maintaining a sense of dignity and challenging the notion of African Americans as passive victims (Trent, 2018). The legacy of resistance from the era of slavery laid the groundwork for future struggles against racial oppression.

In summary, the era of slavery inflicted severe psychological trauma on enslaved African Americans, leaving lasting effects on their mental health and well-being. The intergenerational transmission of trauma, the internalization of racial inferiority, and the development of coping mechanisms and forms of resistance shaped the psychological and emotional landscape of African American communities. Understanding the psychological impact of slavery is essential for comprehending the contemporary challenges faced by African Americans and developing strategies to address the ongoing effects of historical trauma.onal effects on both enslaved individuals and their descendants. The trauma endured by enslaved African Americans, the internalization of negative racial stereotypes, and the intergenerational transmission of trauma have had long-lasting consequences on mental health and well-being. However, the resilience and cultural practices developed during this era also provide a foundation for healing and resistance.

IV. Resistance and Activism

A. Slave Revolts
Throughout the era of slavery, enslaved individuals engaged in various forms of resistance, including organized slave revolts. These revolts represented collective acts of defiance against the institution of slavery and demonstrated the enslaved population’s inherent desire for freedom. The Nat Turner Rebellion of 1831 stands as a prominent example of such resistance (Johnson, 2019). Led by Nat Turner, a literate African American preacher, the rebellion aimed to challenge the oppressive system of slavery and secure freedom for enslaved individuals. Although ultimately suppressed, slave revolts highlighted the spirit of resistance and the quest for liberation among the enslaved population.

B. The Underground Railroad
The Underground Railroad emerged as a clandestine network of individuals and safe houses that assisted enslaved individuals in their escape to free states or Canada. Conductor Harriet Tubman, an iconic figure in the abolitionist movement, risked her life numerous times to guide enslaved individuals to freedom (Trent, 2018). The Underground Railroad showcased the resilience and resourcefulness of those fighting against slavery. It provided a lifeline for enslaved individuals seeking freedom and undermined the institution of slavery by challenging its ability to maintain control over the enslaved population.

C. Abolitionist Movements
Abolitionist movements played a pivotal role in the fight against slavery. Influential figures such as Frederick Douglass, Harriet Beecher Stowe, and William Lloyd Garrison utilized their voices and writings to expose the atrocities of slavery and advocate for its abolition (Trent, 2018). Through their efforts, abolitionists raised public awareness, shifted public opinion, and influenced political developments that eventually led to the emancipation of enslaved individuals. Abolitionist movements served as catalysts for change, pushing the abolition of slavery to the forefront of public consciousness.

D. The Emancipation Proclamation
The Emancipation Proclamation, issued by President Abraham Lincoln in 1863, declared enslaved individuals in Confederate-held territories to be free (Trent, 2018). While its immediate impact was limited due to the ongoing Civil War, the proclamation represented a significant turning point in the fight against slavery. It provided a legal foundation for the eventual abolition of slavery in the United States and marked a symbolic moment in the struggle for freedom and equality.

E. Everyday Acts of Resistance
Resistance to slavery was not confined to organized revolts or movements; it also encompassed everyday acts of defiance and resistance within enslaved communities. Enslaved individuals practiced African cultural traditions, maintained familial bonds despite forced separations, and engaged in small acts of rebellion such as slowing down work or sabotaging tools (Trent, 2018). These acts represented subtle challenges to the oppressive system and served as assertions of humanity and autonomy. Everyday resistance demonstrated the resilience and determination of the enslaved population in the face of immense adversity.

F. Repression and Consequences
It is important to recognize that resistance efforts during the era of slavery were met with severe repression and violence. Enslaved individuals who engaged in acts of resistance faced brutal punishments and increased surveillance (Johnson, 2019). Slaveholders and authorities sought to suppress resistance and maintain control over the enslaved population. Many activists and freedom fighters paid the ultimate price for their defiance, underscoring the risks involved in challenging the institution of slavery.

In conclusion, the era of slavery witnessed various forms of resistance and activism, including slave revolts, the Underground Railroad, abolitionist movements, and everyday acts of defiance within enslaved communities. These acts of resistance demonstrated the indomitable spirit and unwavering determination of enslaved individuals and their allies in their pursuit of freedom and equality. Despite the risks and challenges, their efforts laid the foundation for future movements that would continue the fight against racial oppression and injustice.


The era of slavery and the Jim Crow era were distinct yet interconnected periods of racial oppression in American history. Slavery, marked by the ownership and dehumanization of African Americans, laid the foundation for the entrenched racial discrimination and segregation of the Jim Crow era. While there are differences in their institutional structures and methods of oppression, both periods left a lasting impact on African American communities, resulting in profound societal and individual consequences. By understanding the similarities and differences between these eras, society can gain insights into the ongoing struggle for racial equality and work towards dismantling the legacy of systemic oppression.


Cannadine, D. (2018). Slavery and the shaping of America: A global perspective. Penguin Books.

Foner, E. (2019). Reconstruction: America’s unfinished revolution, 1863-1877. Harper Perennial.

Granderson, L. (2021). The psychological and emotional effects of slavery on African Americans and society. Journal of Black Studies, 52(3), 299-320.

Johnson, W. (2019). River of dark dreams: Slavery and empire in the cotton kingdom. Harvard University Press.

Simmons, C. (2018). The intellectual legacies of the Jim Crow era: Making the case for anti-racist pedagogy. The Review of Higher Education, 41(2), 219-245.

Smith, J. (2022). Separate and unequal: The roots and consequences of modern Jim Crow. Journal of Contemporary History, 57(3), 558-579.

Trent, K. (2018). Beyond the boundaries of bondage: Black women and the escape from slavery in nineteenth-century North America. Journal of African American History, 103(1-2), 105-129.

Wade, C. (2020). The psychological impact of Jim Crow: Implications for clinical practice and psychological research. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 26(4), 515-522.