Citation: JAMA
Subject: Project Development and Proposal
By the end of week 6, please submit the first draft of your applied scholarly project proposal via Canvas. Your proposal should include an introduction, conclusion, and other headings that you feel are appropriate. Your proposal should be written in JAMA format. All writing assignments are expected to follow the Journal of the American Medical Association Manual of Style (JAMA). The updated reference manual can be found here: https://www.jamamanualofstyle.com/ (Links to an external site.)
The length should be a minimum of 4 pages, but no longer than 8 pages (not including the title page, references, or any appendices). The following questions should be thoroughly answered in your proposal.
What is your topic?
Who is your audience?
What is the purpose of your scholarly project?
What is the significance of your project for the profession?
What are the main ideas that you will convey to the audience?
What is the scope of your project?
To which peer-reviewed journal will you submit the final manuscript of your scholarly project?
To which professional conference will you submit the poster summarizing your scholarly project?
Criteria
Unsatisfactory
Meets Expectations
Exceeds Expectations
Outstanding
Content (55%)
0 – 41.9%
3 or 4 of the following need revision or are missing: provides an effective introduction of the proposed scholarly project; includes a thorough rationale for pursuing the project; provides an effective conclusion to the proposal; demonstrates scholarship by including scholarly references to support project rationale (peer reviewed articles less than 5 years old).
42 – 47.9%
2 of the following need revision or are missing: provides an effective introduction of the proposed scholarly project; includes a thorough rationale for pursuing the project; provides an effective conclusion to the proposal; demonstrates scholarship by including scholarly references to support project rationale (peer reviewed articles less than 5 years old).
48 – 53.9%
1 of the following need revision or are missing: provides an effective introduction of the proposed scholarly project; includes a thorough rationale for pursuing the project; provides an effective conclusion to the proposal; demonstrates scholarship by including scholarly references to support project rationale (peer reviewed articles less than 5 years old).
54 – 60%
All of the following are successfully addressed: provides an effective introduction of the proposed scholarly project; includes a thorough rationale for pursuing the project; provides an effective conclusion to the proposal; demonstrates scholarship by including scholarly references to support project rationale (peer reviewed articles less than 5 years old).
Organization (25%)
0 – 20.9%
More than 3 of the following need revision or are missing: length of paper was no fewer than 4 pages but no more than 8 pages; included clear headings for each section of the proposal; discussion and reasoning was clear and focused; writing demonstrates appropriate professional quality, is clear and easy to follow; defined all appropriate terms
21 – 23.9%
2-3 of the following need revision or are missing: length of paper was no fewer than 4 pages but no more than 8 pages; included clear headings for each section of the proposal; discussion and reasoning was clear and focused; writing demonstrates appropriate professional quality, is clear and easy to follow; defined all appropriate terms
24 – 26.9%
1-2 of the following need revision or are missing: length of paper was no fewer than 4 pages but no more than 8 pages; included clear headings for each section of the proposal; discussion and reasoning was clear and focused; writing demonstrates appropriate professional quality, is clear and easy to follow; defined all appropriate terms
27 – 30%
All of the following are successfully addressed: length of paper was no fewer than 4 pages but no more than 8 pages; included clear headings for each section of the proposal; discussion and reasoning was clear and focused; writing demonstrates appropriate professional quality, is clear and easy to follow; defined all appropriate terms
Formatting and Grammar (10%)
0 – 6.9%
Excessive grammar, spelling, and/or JAMA formatting errors throughout the assignment
7 – 7.9%
There is a pattern of errors in grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation, as well as errors with JAMA formatting
8 – 8.9%
There are a few errors in grammar, spelling, and/or JAMA formatting but overall well done
9 – 10%
Excellent grammar, spelling, and JAMA formatting with appropriate paragraphs, sentences, and headings throughout the assignment
Timeliness
(10%)
0-6.9%
First draft and/or final draft of the proposal are submitted more than 96 hours after the deadline noted in the syllabus.
7-7.9%
First draft and/or final draft of the proposal are submitted late but within 49-96 hours of the deadline noted in the syllabus.
8-8.9%
First draft and/or final draft of the proposal are submitted late but within 48 hours of the deadline noted in the syllabus.
9-10%
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|
