Explain how you would explain the hazards of this type of thinking to someone not involved in public health?

Select one of the questions below to research. Present your response in a well-written 2-3 page paper, with a minimum of 5 peer-reviewed/scholarly sources supporting your writing, and properly cited in APA format.
(1) Relative to the situation in developing countries, waterborne disease in the United States is a non-issue. The CDC reports very few deaths from waterborne disease outbreaks, and we therefore have no reason to worry. What are the potential fallacies in this statement? How would you explain the hazards of this type of thinking to someone not involved in public health?
(2) Given resources from a major international foundation, what three interventions would you propose to improve the health of urban populations in a low-income country? Would you recommend different interventions for urban populations in a high-income country? Why or Why not?
(3) Nuclear energy is essential in the fight against climate change. Use evidence to defend your position for or against this statement. Your answer should include both a health-based argument and a technology-based argument for meeting the demands for energy.
(4) Your text describes the health risks of particulate matter at the PM 10 and PM 2.5 levels, but as the technology of diesel engines improved the size of the PM fell. What is the health risk associated with ultra-fine particulate matter? Typically described as .1 micrometers or smaller in size.

Last Completed Projects