Compare and Contrast competing views on the State; in particular, explore the content of the State under “normal juridical” practices vs. “emergency rule”. Your discussion should account for the content of State practices under both and explore the implications they have for the formation of nationhood, social construction of race, race relations and dissidence.

You CANNOT use any outside sources! the only source you can use is the one I provided. If anything changes I will be sure to let you know.

All responses should offer conceptual engagement with terms that we’ve learned in class, this means defining terms and demonstrating knowledge of it through application to an example. Students are encouraged to evaluate the strengths and limitations of various perspectives on issues posed in the question. It is important to substantiate claims with examples and provide rationality.

1)Compare and Contrast competing views on the State; in particular, explore the content of the State under “normal juridical” practices vs. “emergency rule”. Your discussion should account for the content of State practices under both and explore the implications they have for the formation of nationhood, social construction of race, race relations and dissidence.
2)From a historical perspective, evaluate the concepts of agency, due process and democracy in liberalism and racial liberalism. In the contemporary context, examine how liberalism and racial liberalism understand in theory and practice “agency”, “due process” and “democracy”, factoring in similarities and differences in both paradigms.

Last Completed Projects