Explain how a king can distinguish between the demonstrators’ violation of law and that of the segregationist officials?

Topic: First provide a very brief historical overview of the context in which King wrote the 1963 “Letter” by exploring the specific incidents in Birmingham, Alabama, that led to nonviolent “direct action” and King’s subsequent arrest. Then turn to the text itself and focus on an obstacle of liberation for King and others – segregation in Birmingham. Next, briefly discuss King’s transformative action for justice- nonviolent “direct action” against segregation. I argue that King’s text articulated an approach to the normative theory of political obligation where an individual has a natural duty or moral obligation to disobey unjust laws. Also, what counts as a law that is “morally wrong and sinful,” which MLK basis as a valid justification for civil disobedience. Finally, I reflect on how King’s letter provides a template for marginalized communities in America today.

Questions:

– Did MLK articulate in the 1963 Letter best justifiy an approach to the normative theory of political obligation, as a religious or other commitment to non-violence irrespective of regime illegitimacy, or as a strategic measure given the opportunities presented by a federal-government and Northern-electorate audience and the leverage established by the existence of more militant groups?

– How would you evaluate the claim that the restrained approach in the Letter — e.g., that disobedience be approached “lovingly” — concedes to white officials and the white community in Birmingham too much respect, from either a moral or a strategic vantage point?

– How well can King distinguish between the demonstrators’ violation of law and that of the segregationist officials?

– How much of King’s approach relies on the potential for federal courts to rule in King’s favor or for the federal government to be spurred to legislation, as opposed to an appeal to an autonomous Southern political community within which African-Americans were effectively subordinated and subjected to terror?

Last Completed Projects