**You would need to be able to access the article that is listed in the question for citing purposes. It is imperative. I also have the PowerPoint lecture notes for the class that this was discussed and can send them to also pull information from.**
Among the various ways of assessing people, projective techniques have enjoyed
considerable popularity in the past. As each generation of mental health practitioners
enters the field, there is a trend of fewer professionals using such instruments. [In
addition to your lecture notes, it is highly recommended to refer to the Lilienfield, Wood,
& Garb (2000) article (specific page numbers provided where appropriate).]
a. Discuss the assumptions underlying projective theory (i.e., the projective
hypothesis) – refer to lecture notes and Lilienfield et al. (2000) pp. 28-29.
b. Many meta-analyses and literature reviews, including Lilienfield et al. (2000),
have highlighted the concerns of norming, scoring, reliability, validity, and
interpretation. The Rorschach Inkblot Test and Thematic Apperception Test have
received much criticism for these concerns (probably because they are used the
most). Lilienfield et al. (pp. 56-58) provide seven recommendations-advicecomments for the clinical use of projectives. Identify three recommendations that
resonate most strongly with you as you see yourself as a mental health
professional. Explain.
c. As stated by Lilienfield et al. (2000, pp. 27-28), although the use of projectives
has declined over the years, many professionals still utilize them as a part of
formal assessment. Why do you think projectives are still used even though
reliability and validity is poor? What are some possible consequences for the
field of psychology if such instruments continue to be utilized?
d. Considering your answers to questions #5 and #6, what personality assessment
approach (structured vs. projective) would you feel most comfortable relying upon
when making diagnostic impressions and implementing interventions? Explain.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|