Student-Facing Task or Event
Student affairs exists to serve students within their higher education setting. Programming, events, and meetings should all reflect this value and tie directly back to positively affecting and developing the student experience.
Allocate at least 8 hours in the field to support this field experience.
Participate in or help facilitate a student affairs student-facing task or event per the delegation of your site supervisor.
Spend any remaining field experience hours observing and assisting your site supervisor.
Following your participation or facilitation, as well as observations, write a 250-500 word summary reflecting upon the following:
Describe the student-facing task or event in which you participated or facilitated, as well as your specific role.
Explain how the task or event strategically supports the student affairs responsibility to affect and develop students .
Describe aspects of the task or event that were either superfluous or could be improved.
Explain the evidence that was collected or observed that demonstrates how the program positively affected students.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
Rubric
Description of Task or Event and the Role
20.0
Not addressed.
Erroneously describes the student-facing task or event, as well as the specific role.
Partially describes the student-facing task or event, as well as the specific role.
Considerably describes the student-facing task or event, as well as the specific role.
Specifically describes the student-facing task or event, as well as the specific role.
Affecting and Developing Students
20.0
Not addressed.
Fails to explain how the task or event strategically supports the student affairs responsibility to affect and develop students.
Minimally explains how the task or event strategically supports the student affairs responsibility to affect and develop students.
Descriptively explains how the task or event strategically supports the student affairs responsibility to affect and develop students.
Insightfully explains how the task or event strategically supports the student affairs responsibility to affect and develop students.
Task or Event Improvements
20.0
Not addressed.
Inappropriately describes aspects of the task or event that were either superfluous or could be improved.
Somewhat describes aspects of the task or event that were either superfluous or could be improved.
Appropriately describes aspects of the task or event that were either superfluous or could be improved.
Realistically describes aspects of the task or event that were either superfluous or could be improved.
Effect on Students
20.0
Not addressed.
Inaccurately explains the evidence that was collected or observed that demonstrates how the program positively affected students.
Weakly explains the evidence that was collected or observed that demonstrates how the program positively affected students.
Accurately explains the evidence that was collected or observed that demonstrates how the program positively affected students.
Professionally explains the evidence that was collected or observed that demonstrates how the program positively affected students.
Organization
10.0
Not addressed.
An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other; or the summary is widely outside of the required word count.
The content is not adequately organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. The summary may not be within a reasonable range of the required word count.
The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within a reasonable range of the required word count.
The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within the required word count.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
10.0
Not addressed.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present.
Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language.
Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Total Percentage 100
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|
