For this part you need to listen to the podcast with the website link i have attached and use the reading i have attached to answer the second part for this assingment. It is to follow the guidelines i provided on how to do this assingment and the reading as well as the podcast link and you can use other sources. All is to be cited APA style ith header as well but this assignment goes toegther in one document with the first part. The link for the podcast needed is : https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p058gg29 or https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p058gg29.
You are expected to make use of detailed archaeological data and interpretations we have examined in the class. Please feel free to refer to your modules, assigned readings, assignments and notes, though you must adhere to the following guidelines:
You will not plagiarize or otherwise copy your responses from any published sources or another student.
You must cite all of your sources in a bibliography accurately and completely. Please be sure to use reliable sources, if you must look outside of your modules, avoid: wikipedia, history channel, any blog or webpage that screams “pseudo-archaeology”.
Each response should be 300-500 words.
Please start with a brief introduction and end your response with a clear conclusion.
Be sure to justify your answers, simple: yes, no, I agree, I think… are not enough. Explain why do you agree and based on what? You need to convince the reader that your ideas are strong and well-grounded.
for citation and style, you may use APA or CMOS, whichever you feel comfortable with or are trying to improve at. Please don’t use MLA.
The question is : QUESTION 2 – Who owns the past? (50 pts)
Listen to the podcast (23 min) The necklace that divided two nations (Links to an external site.)
(Links to an external site.)and read (also available in audio 8 min) If we return Nazi-looted art, the same goes for empire-looted (Links to an external site.)
In the case of a shared heritage, but divided nations, how should artifacts and monuments be treated? Should nations hold on to their artifacts and not share them with other museums? Does this compare or contrast with empire-looted art that has been divided? What solutions do you propose for the division of artifacts between international museums and local communities?
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|
