IF YOU CAN ONLY PROVIDE A SUMMARY PLEASE DONT EXCPET THE TASK!!
Introduction:
Introduce issue and context
Give the title of the essay/article you are analyzing, and the full name of the authorState your working thesis on the issue
State the thesis or major claim of the article (and relation to your own thesis)
State your analysis thesis: What makes this author’s argument effective?
Analysis of Weaknesses – brief summary of counter arguments that it is not effective
1. What objections do you or other readers have to the claims or the evidence in the article?
2. Does the author effectively answer any of these objections in the article?
3. Explain and give examples.
Analysis of Strengths: Give a multi-paragraph, detailed analysis of the rhetorical strategies (including STAR evaluation of evidence) which make the argument effective:
What kind of evidence is provided? Is it more objective ( facts, results of scientific experiments and studies, logical reasoning, expert testimony) or more subjective (biased testimony, personal experience, unsupported opinions)? Is this the best kind of evidence available on this issue? Is it used reasonably and fairly?
What kind of rhetorical strategies are used? Discuss at least three (logic, values, authority, humor, tone, organization, style, audience awareness, etc.) Why did the author use these strategies? Do the rhetorical strategies seem effective and appropriate for this argument and issue? Why or why not? Give examples with short quotes and explanations.
Conclusion: Your overall evaluation of the argument and its relevance to your own research topic. Would this article be useful to your
research? Explain.
https://www.politico.eu/article/data-at-risk-amazon-security-threat/amp/
THIS IS THE ARTICLE .
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|