Analytic Presentation

please check if the source is analyticaly presented correct
Analytic Presentation
Technology
will change our lives in the future! This is a joint statement made by most
people who feel that the rapid development and progression of technology have
impacted daily life. Nicholas Carr explains similar sentiments in his article
“Is Google Making us Stupid?” the analysis of the presentation with a
focus on the key ideas and policies developed is vital in synthesizing the
argument with the reasons behind it. The study covers the major points in
discussion with a review of the rhetoric appeals developed from it. This makes
it easy to determine the author’s success in front of the discussion points.
Carr
develops the argument by relying on a crucial rhetoric appeal. He adopts the
use of logos as a way of explaining his point. The appeal is created on the
need to focus on the logical reasoning and developments of the situation (Higgins
& Walker, 2012). It is a necessary form of review which allows the audience
to understand the cognitive features and functions in the argument, thus, efficiently
achieving responsible insights. He uses rhetoric to explain his thesis and
provides evidence that backs up the claims. By doing so, he allows the audience
to ponder on the severity of the situation with a focus on the best and most
effective ways which can be used to fully achieve success within the change. He
further expounds on the issue by providing examples of his own experiences
before and after the introduction of the internet. The appeal is an important
feature that helps the article to gain ground and be understood by the target
audience.
The
author’s reliance on the rhetoric appeal is practical and speaks to the
article’s contents. It is an effective way of explaining the fundamental
problems with the internet and how it has impacted daily lives. However, in the
development of the thesis and the evidence, it was essential to also focus on
the appeals to the audience’s emotions and general sympathetic imaginations.
The appeal is known as pathos and is used to reiterate the logical nature of the
argument (Davoudi et al. 2020). The view is that the evidence on the negative
impacts of Google can be best explained on a moral basis. Therefore, it becomes
essential to use pathos and work on ensuring that the best argumentative
structures are based upon when crafting the study. Also, it further opens the
reviews to accommodate other external evidence, which can point to the negative
adaptations of the internet.
The
article’s style, tone, and language support the extensive measures in the
author’s arguments. The author takes an authoritative manner that integrates
the divergent views and enhanced focused measures, which improve the study
perspective over time. Also, the author references reputable sources, which are
used to reiterate the nature of the discussion and the impacts seen in the
appeal. For instance, the author quotes sociologist Daniel Bell when explaining
the issue (Carr, 2008). They are also in tandem with the predominant rhetorical
appeal in the discussion frame.
The
article is effective in the explanation of the points and associative
mechanisms for future analysis. The author relies on rhetoric appeals to
explain the adverse effects of the internet. However, more could have been done
with the reliance on susceptible improvements and more responsible measures to
explain the nature and impacts of the problems.

References
Carr,
N. (2008). Is Google making us stupid?. Yearbook of the National
Society for the Study of Education, 107(2), 89-94.
Davoudi,
S., Galland, D., & Stead, D. (2020). Reinventing planning and planners:
Ideological decontestations and rhetorical appeals. Planning Theory, 19(1),
17-37.
Higgins,
C., & Walker, R. (2012, September). Ethos, logos, pathos: Strategies of
persuasion in social/environmental reports. In Accounting Forum (Vol.
36, No. 3, pp. 194-208). No longer published by Elsevier.

Last Completed Projects