CRISPR Literature Review

*‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌**CRISPR is the technology being covered in this project*** Write a review of literature based on the technology you are investigating for your Course Project [CRISPR is the technology] . A review of literature may be defined as an analysis of published information in a particular subject area. It has some similarities to an annotated bibliography, but differs in important respects. An annotated bibliography focuses on annotations, or summaries, of sources. In contrast, a review of literature analyzes the sources, draws connections among them, and notes changes in thinking over time. A review of literature will focus on the following questions. What are the key points of agreement among the sources? What are the key points of disagreement among the sources? Do any of the sources appear to be outliers? In other words, are there any sources that bring up issues, or make assertions, that the other sources do not discuss? Which sources appear to be the most powerful or influential? Are there sources that all of the other sources deem highly authoritative? Are there any sources whose assertions seem dubious, illogical, or unsupported by the facts? How has thinking changed about your topic over time? Are there beliefs that have fallen out of favor? Successful assignments will do the following. Analyze at least five sources from reputable publications that will be provided Demonstrate points of similarities and differences, note patterns, and evaluate source quality Be approximately 750–1,0‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌00 words in length Be formatted per current APA standards, including a separate title page and references page References to be reviewed: Karimian, A., Azizian, K., Parsian, H., Rafieian, S., Shafiei-Irannejad, V., Kheyrollah, M., Yousefi, M., Majidinia, M., & Yousefi, B. (2019). CRISPR/Cas9 technology as a potent molecular tool for gene therapy. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 234(8), 12267–12277. Brokowski, C., & Adli, M. (2019). CRISPR Ethics: Moral considerations for applications of a powerful tool. Journal of Molecular Biology, 431(1), 88–101. Hamzelou, J. (2016, May 3). Let people most affected by gene editing write CRISPR rules. New Scientist. Zhang, D., Hussain, A., Manghwar, H., Xie, K., Xie, S., Zhao, S., … & Ding, F. (2020). Genome editing with the CRISPR?Cas system: an art, ethics and global regulatory perspective. Plant biotechnology journal, 18(8), 1651-1669. Savulescu, J., Pugh, J., Douglas, T., & Gyngell, C. (2015). The Moral Imperative to Continue Gene Editing Research on Human Embryos. Protein Cell, 6(7), 476-479. DOI: Bortesi, L. & Fischer, R. (2015). The CRISPR/Cas9 System for Plant Genome Editing and Beyond. Biotechnology Advances, 33(1):41-52. Retrieved from

Last Completed Projects