What do you think the ruling should have been for each case.

Today is your first day as an intern at the prestigious Law Firm of Gemmie & Aye. The lead attorney stops by to welcome you and give you your first assignment. He hands you two cases. Then he gives you the following instructions:
I want you to:
1. Carefully read Kuehn v. Pub Zone ( page 14)and Del Lago Partners, Inc v Smith (page 17)(both are in Chapter 1 of your textbook). Write a summary of each case (include what you believe are the import parts of each case)
2. Analyze each case. What do you think the ruling should have been for each case. More importantly, fully explain your ruling (how you came to your decision).
expecting a minimum of two paragraphs. I am paying for two pages. One page for each case

Your essay should answer all of the following:
1) Summary of Kuehn v Pub Zone and Del Lago Partners, Inc. v. Smith
2) Statement of what you thing the ruling should have been in each case.
3) Full explanation of your ruling.
4) 2 Paragraphs Minimum
5) Use complete sentences/paragraphs and do not use bullet points.

Link to book

Last Completed Projects

topic title academic level Writer delivered