Language in its Sociocultural Context :Critical Review

Instructions SHOULD be followed strictly as attached in file of instructions.Remember to present full references not only for the articles you are reviewing, but also for any other work you may draw on.A sample of a critical review is attached for you so that you must follow the same method and representation.all articles that should be used in the critical comparison review are attached. They are four articles which you need to write about in your critical review for comparison and also, use other related sources to support and back up your argument. Be careful! this assignment is NOT about paraphrasing from sources, it is about getting engaged critically with the articles to compare and contrast ((them all together)) to deliver a critical review.Also, attached there is a sample of a critical review from which you can make up your own critical review and this is how it must be done.Finally, as mentioned in the instructions, I have selected PHASE 1 ( Community of Practice) with its 4 base sources ( I downloaded them here). and please pay attention to the English Academic writing.While writing please follow PEECAL:this is a good general rule for writing. Each sentence (and paragraph) should make one point, and you shouldn’t move on to the next point until you’ve fully explained the first. A good way of doing this is following the PEECAL structure soP: Point (state your point)E: Evidence (support your point with evidence, whether a quotation from the text, or from another scholarE: Explanation (explain and discuss your point)C: Context (offer context, from the text/historical discussion, to relate back to the point)A: Analysis (provide close analysis and interpretation of the text, and use this to support the point that your making)L: Link (link your point, evidence and analysis back to the essay question)So each paragraph/point you make should do those thingsOne sentence / paragraph should give one idea, and when you’re ready to offer a new idea, move on to a new sentence. And there should be a logical structure, so when you finish making a point and move on to the next one, there should be some connection (either through similarity or difference/comparison) with the one that follows. I.e. you should move from point A to point B in a logical way, and the progression of your ideas should make senseYou also need to make sure you FULLY develop each point, one sentence is not enough to stand on its own. Break it down into simplistic step by step points, and then we can go back and make it “academic” language etc (I can provide an example to illustrate!).Comments from CustomerFormat: Other:harvard

Last Completed Projects