Cohen, Carl, and Tom Regan. The Animal Rights Debate. Rowman & Littlefield Publishing, Inc., 2001.
DeGue, Sarah. The Psychology of the Human-Animal Bond | Springerlink. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4419-9761-6.
Dzwonkowska, Dominika. “The Concept of Radical Responsibility for Non-Human Animals.” Frontiers, Frontiers, 1 Jan. 2020, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01487/full.
Kalof, Linda. The Oxford Handbook of Animal Studies. Oxford University Press, 2017.
Rollin, Bernard E. Animal Rights & Human Morality. Prometheus Books, 2006.
Scruton, Roger. Animal Rights and Wrongs. Continuum, 2006.
Silverstein, Helena. Unleashing Rights Law, Meaning, and the Animal Rights Movement. University of Michigan Press, 2009.
Sunstein, Cass R., et al. Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions. Oxford University Press, 2006.
These are the 8 sources that need to be used. Needs to include in-text citations.
Your audience for this project should be academic, coolly rational, and open-minded. Your audience might be specific for members of the field in which you are working but should also be appropriate for a broader audience, those who may be interested in the topic but do not have the specific academic background that professionals in the field will have.
Needs to be double spaced, use Times New Roman, twelve-point font for all parts,
including titles, headers, and headings
In addition to eight sources, every paper should include at least one visual element. The visual
can be a picture, a map, a table, a chart, or some other illustration. The visual should be labeled
and given a caption. You will need to refer to the visual in the paper before the visual occurs, and
you will need to include proper attribution both in the text and in the bibliography.
The bibliography must have at least eight entries, at least five of those scholarly sources. APA
and MLA will alphabetize the entries by authors’ last names; CSE will number the entries
according to the order in which they occur in the paper. All bibliographies should be double
spaced, with no extra spaces between entries. All bibliographic styles use hanging indentation.
The abstract is a summary of the research findings and conclusion (recommendation for action).
It should be written after the entire research project has been completed. The description should
be in the present tense, not the future (“this paper will discuss . . .”). The abstract should
summarize the primary evidence and the conclusions; it should not be a description of the
sources or the research process. The abstract should be about ½ page long, double-spaced. It
should have the heading “Abstract” (without quotation marks). The abstract will be on page 1 for MLA. MLA documents will repeat the first-page heading on the next page with the first page of text, which will be page 2 of
the document. For all documentation styles, the abstract will be on its own page. The text of the
research project will begin on the next page.
Order of Elements
Abstract (all disciplines)
Body of the paper, including an introduction, body, and conclusion. A visual will be
included someplace within the paper itself
Bibliography: all disciplines use hanging indentation; all disciplines except for those
using CSE will alphabetize their sources; CSE will put sources in numeric order.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|
