In “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility,” Harry Frankfurt argues that we have good reason to reject the principle of alternate possibilities. What is the principle of alternate possibilities, and what role has it traditional played in the free will debate? What thought-experiments do Frankfurt use to show that the principle of alternate possibilities is mistaken? What actually accounts for moral responsibility, according to John Martin Fischer?
Responses should be around 3 paragraphs. (3-5 sentences for each paragraph)
Please do not cite.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|
