The Association between sound and texture

Report the result
t(14)=-2.99, p < 0.05 (equal variance not assumed) Don’t add the picture in result from the data Before the t test say Levene's test of equality of variances was not significant, indicating that a parametric test can be used. However, corrected t and p values are presented. (then you present the t test) First we separated the data for the water stimuli and the obvious choice is rain drops image and checked whether indeed the water drop is chosen for the sound. The results the t test analysis that people were actually paying attention How do you interpret the Levene test for homogeneity of variance? The Levene's test uses an F-test to test the null hypothesis that the variance is equal across groups. A p value less then . 05 indicates a violation of the assumption. If a violation occurs, it is likely that conducting the non-parametric equivalent of the analysis is more appropriate. The test of significant variance was not significant Optional comment resulted in 1/3 of participants submitted and in all it was shown that most of them were part of it only few of them were confused Participant no 80 - give example of good and bad comments add all the 11 graphs Either put them all on histogram make them smaller (its just a visual representation) in appendix or try to fit all in one page Or Shrink them very small and put then in a table and report the chi square Have a small table next to it Excluding image 1 and 8th 10/11 still survive People are not just choosing image 1 and 8 Try and report the chi square on the appendix and one while reporting Add all the chi square tables in the result for all 11 But add the 6 separate in appendix. Try to squeeze all in one page within a table 11 rows an d 2columns one column reporting chi square And second with histograms Do not include full data set but share the table in counted and add the picture A full size of the picture is available in the appendix Add the full one with same order in appendix - add to appendix and also add the pictures in order to appendix. Explain the explanation for the table sounds which are used and which are water sounds Explain below you will find the votes given to each image from the stimuli and 5 water sounds which are highlighted in blue. The table is included in Copy of Akshata counted 3 and add to results 1 Time effect file nonparametric Correlations 1. Check all the stimuli from beginning to end Variable 1 is basically sound number which is showing if they’re progressively getting bored Variable 2 - How times votes for image 1 as we suspected how people will choose image 1 when they’re bored Data set 1 between variable 1 and variable 2 P value is close but not significant But because its close that is the justification to why we repeated chi square for only 6 without the 1st and 8th image. Spearmans test was also conducted - the order they did number 5 after number 4 as we don’t know how much they took. But they followed the order. Data set 2 Variable 4 and variable 5( focusing only on the 11th stimuli that we used on chi square The relation ship that we see in all 11 stimuli then it looks like this relationship is not significant at all which means there is no fatigue effect at least not for stimuli 1 . You can report 1 of them or 1 and 2 or all Data set 3 variable 7 and 8 - It was closee to significant there was fatigue effect that seem to disappear for the first image from 11 to 20 that we use but its still there for image 8. That is what justifies the need for double checking chi square with 6 images. At some point people realize that it is easier to click the last as you can end quicker. They’re close to significant as they were close it gives us a reason to repeat chi square. So we can basically raise the possibility its because people are getting tired and using 1 and 8. But we can confirm that there was. Nothing like that as we repeated chi square. In order to rule that out. Data 4 Variable 10 and 11 Just tried the 4 in curiosity its not significant t not even close and more required The other objection for if they’re paying attention is T test which shows that We give them water stimuli and choose rain drops image which proves that participants are actually trying and paying attention. From a mythological point of few its a good way to answer. Read the paper and see what sort of objections and solutions in discussion http://www.daysyn.com/Simneretal2005.pdf ——————xxx———————————— Both in methods and results you should mention why are we doing the 11 sounds and 5 water sounds separately and mention they are highlighted The purpose off this is clear the water stimuli is giving predictable answers. Discussion Summary of the result ‘discussion of the implications like what does kit m Ean understanding theory on the issue I’m studying . In this case it supports the study that Synthese do this consciously but normal people are doing subconsciously. They still choose the same image. Maybe there is something we all share in common with syntheses. Look at paper rakmachandran and Hobart In 2001. Synesthesia ucs mention the paper. They talk about cross model metaphors http://chip.ucsd.edu/pdf/Synaesth_JCS.pdf Chi - Square Mean is the same Sd not required Tables for 2-7 Pictures 61 votes 10.1666 - 10.1666 x2 10.6667 x4 Describe accurately no slip ups and correct sentences.

Last Completed Projects