You should address the central question and argue a point that answers the question.
WHEN REFERENCING PLEASE INCLUDE PAGE NUMBERS (AUTHOR LAST NAME, YEAR, PAGE NUMBER).
Your argument should be supported by (a) original critical reasoning; (b) references to relevant literature, and (c) multiple examples from different parts of the world; you can also include (d) empirical evidence (qualitative and/or quantitative).
Your answer should focus on the primary readings for this course that i have listed here ( If you feel that other primary or secondary sources are necessary to compose your answers, that is fine, but your core response should be based on close readings of these listed texts:
– Healy, Andrew and Neil Malhotra. 2009. ‘Myopic Voters and Natural Disaster Policy’. American Political Science Review 103.3: 387–406.
– Bechtel, Michael M. and Massimo Mannino (2021). ‘Ready When the Big One Comes? Natural Disasters and Mass Support for Preparedness Investment’. Political Behavior, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09738-2.
– Anderson, B., Böhmelt, T. and Ward, T., 2017. ‘Public opinion and environmental policy output: a cross-national analysis of energy policies in Europe’. Environmental Research Letters 12: 114011.
– Birch, Sarah. 2020. ‘Political Polarization and Environmental Attitudes’, Environmental Politics 29.4: 697-718.
The essay outline should resemble this:
introduction: thesis (This essay argues that….), explanation of key terms, essay outline (Firstly this essay will show that …. then …. and finally this essay argues that….)
Main parts: point, evidence, explanation, weakness of argument and strengths, counter argument + weakness and strength of counter argument, conclusion. analyze if argument is sound or not. but keep it relevant to what you’re arguing.
conclusion.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|