please use the HCTSR THAT WAS UPLOADED TO RATE AND PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR RATINGREAD INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY Room for Debate Paper (Part One): Outline Assignment
This outline is aimed to help you write the actual Paper assignment. Therefore, pay attention to the comments and feedback I will provide on your outline.
The Room for Debate Paper assignment asks you to both summarize and evaluate four editorial articles written for the New York Time’s “Room for Debate” series topic: “Have Christians Created a Harmful Atmosphere for Gays?”
You will be using the Holistic Critical Thinking Rubric (HCTSR) to evaluate each of the editorial articles. See Chapter One of the textbook.
NOTE: The paper assignment tests your ability to critically evaluate the four editorial articles assigned. I will be assessing you on your critical thinking skills as you assess the critical thinking skills of the authors who wrote the editorials.
To access the four editorial articles, click here:
https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2016/06/16/have-christians-created-a-harmful-atmosphere-for-gays#main
Instructions:
Tip: Follow and address each step as outlined below. Not doing so will jeopardize your grade.
Pay particular attention to the examples provided and points awarded for each step.
NOTE: Use only bullet points for the outline. Think of the outline as the skeleton for your actual paper.
1. Introduction and Thesis (for the whole paper, not for every author/editorial article)
a. Introduction: Introduce your paper. For example, you may choose to provide the background for this particular topic – why was this topic chosen? 5 points
b. Thesis (for the whole paper, not for every author/editorial article). Review the Writing FAQs guide for thesis help. This thesis sentence presents the central idea of the paper. It must always be a complete, grammatical sentence, specific and brief, which expresses the point of view you are taking towards the subject.* 5 points
2. Summary (summarize each editorial article). 20 points total for all four summaries.
a. State each author’s stance on the debate topic. Does he or she agree with the topic? 8 points total
b. Include three main points for each editorial article. 12 points total
c. Avoid using quotes – I want to see that you understand what the author is trying to say in your own words. Refer to the Summary Writing Guide posted in Canvas under Helpful links if you are not sure how to write a summary.
3. Evaluation:50 points total
a. Explain what the HCTSR is. 4 points
b. Identify two HCTSR critical thinking skills (or lack of skills) for each author and provide a single HCTSR rating based on these skills or lack of skills. 8 points total
c. Select two relevant quotes from each author to support your HCTSR rating of each author. Cite appropriately. 8 points total
d. Explain in detail how these quotes demonstrate the HCTSR skills or lack of skills you identified for each author. 20 points total
e. Using terminology from the textbook will show me that you are knowledgeable of the material and will therefore be to your benefit. 10 points
Examples for the Evaluation section (include exact terminology from the textbook).
EXAMPLE 1: Two HCTSR critical thinking skills:
“Offers analyses and evaluations of obvious alternative points of views.”
“Fair-mindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead.”
HCTSR rating is “3” Acceptable.
EXAMPLE 2: Two HCTSR critical thinking skills (lack of skills)
“Fails to identify or hastily dismisses strong, relevant counterarguments.”
“Exhibit close-mindedness and hostility to reason.”
HCTSR rating is “1” Weak.
NOTE: Citing and correct punctuation are required for the above as you are using terminology from a source.
4. Conclusion: 10 points
a. This should sum up your whole paper and not for each editorial article.
b. Provide your thoughts on the topic
5. Citation Style and Format: 10 points
a. This course uses the MLA citation format. Cite and punctuate appropriately throughout the outline. only use the sources inthis instruction use Times New Romans Font 12 point
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|
