Week 3-4 Discussion: Feasibility Study and Report
Please remember to
meet the 200-250 word count requirement for both posts,
demonstrate your best work,
your second post on/before Sunday, July 4 at 11:59 pm.
Your second post should respond to a student in the course who has not yet been responded to.
Post 2: Respond to an initial post that has not yet been responded to. Consider further developing the ideas in the post you are responding to, disagreeing with them, and/or doing both. Think of your response as an opportunity for you to engage in a conversation with the author of the post that you are responding to. This post should also include a properly formatted/cited paraphrased or direct quote (no more than 15 words) reference from the text that supports (or refutes) your position.
Grading Rubric
Post 2:
20 pts–Response to the post of another student who has not already been responded to: Succinctly well-written, demonstrates critical thinking, adds quality to our discussion, demonstrates an understanding of student’s post and this week’s reading
10 pts.–includes a paraphrased or direct quote (no more than 15 words) reference from the text or some other source that is properly formatted/cited
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|