Uploaded is the article that needs peer reviewed, and example of what is expected, and the grading rubric for this assignment
Respond to your peer’s initial post and offer constructive feedback to address the following:
What areas of the proposal work well?
What areas of the proposal could benefit from additional clarification?
What remaining questions do you have related to your colleague’s chosen topic and proposal?
Does the proposal contain all the required elements as outlined in the Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric document?
In your post, also discuss how your peer’s work influences or informs your own proposal or your understanding of your topic. Keep in mind that the intent of your peer review is not to provide your classmate with a number or letter grade. Instead, you are providing written feedback as to the question prompts noted above.
Keep the following guidelines in mind as you formulate your review. In your review:
Include constructive feedback offering insights as to how your peer could improve his or her next draft.
Direct your review at the content of the proposal and not the author.
Ask clarifying questions whenever possible
Your first post (your peer review) will be three to
four paragraphs long
BE COURTEOUS AND FRIENDLY IN YOUR RESPONSES! THIS IS TO HELP YOUR CLASSMATES NOT DISPARAGE THEM!
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|