This week’s discussion is all about mythbusting!! Please remember to use at least two cited sources.
1) This lecture should have changed some viewpoints on lying.
1a) Before this PowerPoint, did you consider yourself to be a good liar – or a good lie detector? What was surprising to you?
1b) Describe the difference between deception, lying, and malingering. Draw up two different scenarios describing 2/3. “My coworker was lying when…” / “This patient would be malingering because…”
1c) Now that we know that lying is much harder to detect than often thought, what are your best recommendations for how professionals (law enforcement, judges, psychologists, etc) approach lying/deception in the future?
2) This lecture discussed investigative psychology.
2a) What were your initial thoughts on investigative psychology? How did this lecture change your mind? (You can reference Criminal Minds, etc – it always comes up!)
2b) If you were an investigative psychologist, how confident would you feel about testifying to court? Why?
2c) Building off of 2b: Is investigative psychology a “worthy” field? Should it be studied and executed despite its flaws, or should psychologists pivot to something more evidence-based?This week’s discussion is all about mythbusting!! Please remember to use at least two cited sources.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|
