Economic Sociology Term Paper

This assignment asks you to demonstrate an understanding of the theoretical framework of economic sociology by applying it to a new case in an independent and analytic research proposal (I already chose a topic and wrote a topic proposal- I attached it as a pdf with comments). In 1900 words (references excluded), you will be asked to select and analyze an economic phenomenon of your choice (the economic phenomenon is already chosen in the topic proposal but does need some altering (check the topic proposal pdf with comments). The paper should draw from lecture material, course readings, and at least five additional academic sources to support your analysis.
I attached a pdf of my Topic proposal with comments in yellow sticky notes (you have to open the sticky notes to see them) – Keep these comments in mind while writing this assignment
I also attached the lecture slides and course readings- Please use these as much as you can (use any that are relevant)
The paper should include all of the following:
Description of an economic phenomenon to be researched and explained; definition and description of two of the three major theoretical perspectives (economistic, structural, cultural); application of the two chosen theoretical perspectives to your phenomenon (e.g. how might each of the two chosen major perspectives explain your phenomenon?); and an argument for which of the two chosen perspectives offers the best explanation of your phenomenon
The two phenomenons are already chosen (check topic proposal pdf)

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sociological Comprehension of Course Concepts:
Demonstrates strong, clear, in-depth understanding of course material; key terms and concepts accurately and precisely defined. Readings and lectures skillfully used to illustrate and define key concepts.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Integration of Course Readings and Outside Sources:
Creative, skillful, accurate and appropriate use and integration of course readings. At least five external (non-course readings) academic book chapters or journal articles are cited and effectively integrated in the paper (e.g. sources help to advance the broader argument of the paper).

Argumentation:
Argument is clear, logical, nuanced, and persuasive. Logical points build directly upon the thesis and prior points. Counter-arguments are addressed, dismantled, and folded into the main argument of the paper. Thoughtful consideration of the strengths and weaknesses of alternative theoretical perspectives

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Use of Evidence:
Author provides sufficient background information on phenomenon (sufficient = reader can fully understand the argument to come). Each logical claim is backed up by one or more examples. Evidence is strong and sufficient to advance the argument. Key details of case are clearly explained. Extraneous evidence (evidence or fact that do not help advance the argument) should not be present.

Organization and Writing:
Clear organizational structure. Transition sentences connect major ideas. There are few or no grammar or spelling errors. Ideas and evidence are correctly cited.

Last Completed Projects