Ethical Reasoning, Values, and Critical Reasoning
This week’s discussion question asks you to draw upon the interactive lecture and readings for this week and address two of the following four questions regarding concepts of ethical reasoning:
What is the essential basis for ethical reasoning, according to Paul and Elder? Why are ethical principles not a matter of subjective preference?
How might reasoning processes be used to achieve unethical goals? What examples of this have you witnessed in your personal or professional life?
What are some challenges of moral absolutism and moral relativism?
How do you assess religious ideals as a source of value and ethics? How would Azlin Puteh Salin, Ab Manan, Kamaluddin, and Nawawi (2017) argue for specific types of religious ethics as a means to think critically? Why might Norenzayan (2014) challenge their thinking?
Requirements for Discussion Boards:
Utilize and interface with the required readings to analyze and engage the discussion board questions.
Your initial post should be concise and to the point and be supported by the required readings. Be sure to include a reference in each post, including peer responses.
You must include a scholarly source
(Links to an external site.)
that is not part of the required or recommended reading for the HUM101 course. The CSU Global Library
(Links to an external site.)
is a good place to find these sources.
Format your discussion, including all in-text citations and references, according to the CSU Global Writing Center
(Links to an external site.)
.
Each discussion board post should include citations from course content and/or scholarly sources.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|