Refer to the instructions folder for clear instructions.
The paper format is given in the Template folder. Please use this template to edit.
The papers and presentations to be referred are provided in the “Papers to Refer” and “Presentatio ns to refer ” folders respectively.
SUMMARY:
• Write a short term paper titled “A Personal Position Paper on Consulting” .
• The personal position paper is a personal interpretation on selected salient points from a body of knowledge.
• It may use first person pronouns “I”, “my” etc. The paper (including references) may not exceed ten pages. Appendices are not included in the page count limit.
• Prompting questions:
○ What did I learn from reading this article?
○ What was the intention of the authors?
○ Who is the audience for the article?
○ How could I use the article?
• Pointers
○ Pick out some aspect of interest from the paper
○ Comment on it (there are no wrong answers, it’s just an opinion)
○ Link it back to design processes.
○ And consider linking your argument with pertinent external readings
• The following rubric (a protocol or procedure) on assessing a written work may also be useful…
○ Audience:
§ Who is the reading directed at?
§ Is a question formulated, is it interesting and clearly put?
§ Did the author clearly explain the purpose of the article?
○ Structure:
§ Are the thoughts/arguments connected?
§ Is there a logic to the presentation of ideas?
§ Is theory utilised?
§ If so is it treated critically or uncritically (just applied)?
§ Do the authors anticipate and respond to counter-arguments?
○ Style of evidence:
§ Does the work offer conjecture and possibilities based on the literature?
§ Does the work offer empirical matter?
§ Are assumptions stated?
§ Is a philosophical foundation indicated?
○ Validity:
§ How is the work positioned such that we understand how to test the extent of its claims, justification, rigour.
○ Rhetoric:
§ Is the article persuasive?
§ Are the findings, discussion and conclusions convincing?
§ Does the work present implications and impacts?
§ Are there behavioural, managerial, organisational consequences
• Grading :
Grading will consider the following criteria:
Contribution (and purpose) is clearly explained.
Critical positioning in literature.
Empirical justifications, data and evidence presented.
Quality of the document as a finished product
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|
