Patient Safety and Quality Care Movement Presentation Create and submit a five to ten minute voice-over-PowerPoint (VOPPT) or video presentation describing the Patient Safety and Quality Care Movement (PSQCM). The purpose of this presentation is to describe the PSQCM, identify concepts related to the PSQCM, discuss components of the movement, and significance to the professional nurse. Your audience is a group of healthcare professionals that do not know anything about the PSQCM.
In ten minutes or less, using the parameters in the Patient Safety Movement Rubric
download
, explain the PSQCM to your colleagues. The presentation should include but not be limited to the following slides:
Title with student and university name per APA formatting
Introduction/Purpose
Definition/description of PSQCM
Types of safety errors
Institute of Medicine (IOM) concepts
Significance of PSQCM to nursing profession
Significance of PSQCM to student
Conclusion
References
References
Three resources must be cited using APA format (7th edition)
References should appear as superscript numbers according to the order in which they were mentioned throughout the presentation.
The reference slide should then have the reference listed in numerical order, rather than alphabetical order as with writing assignments.
APA Format and grammar:
No slang is permitted
Presentation Guidelines
download
:
Five to ten minutes in length
May be VOPPT or video recorded presentation
Presentation must not have audio or video issues
Creativity is encouraged
Here are some sample PSQCM presentations: Sample1 https://usflearn.instructure.com/courses/https://usflearn.instructure.com/courses/1666678/files/116370916/download?wrap=1/files/116370916/download?wrap=1://usflearn.instructure.com/courses/1666678/files/116370916/download?wrap=1
download
and Sample2
download
Here is a
YouTube video
(Links to an external site.)
that will assist you in learning how to create a voice-over-PowerPoint (VOPPT) presentation.
Patient Safety & Quality Care Movement Presentation Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Content
15 pts
Complete and thorough content
• Content and purpose were clear. • Definition and/or description of patient safety, the Patient Safety & Quality Care Movement, and the significance & recommendations of the IOM’s To Err is Human were covered substantively with detail. • Types and/or root causes of errors, i.e. latent, active, organizational system and technical failure(s) were clearly described. • The conceptual components of the IOM’s quality cwere for the 21st century and the significance to nursing were discussed. • The author included a well-developed discussion about how the conceptual components of the IOM relates in his/her practice as a student or future nurse. • The IOM Quality of Health Care in America Committee’s recommendations were listed and explained. Significance of these recommendations were explored in the presentation.
10 pts
Moderate Content
• Content and purpose were moderately clear. • Definition and/or description of patient safety, the Patient Safety & Quality Care Movement, and the significance & recommendations of of the IOM’s To Err is Human were moderately covered. •Types and/or root causes of errors, i.e. latent, active, organizational system and technical failure(s) were described. • The conceptual components of the IOM’s quality cwere for the 21st century and the significance to nursing were discussed. • The author included a moderately-developed discussion about how the conceptual components of the IOM relates in his/her practice as a student or future nurse. • The IOM Quality of Health Care in America Committee’s recommendations were listed. Significance of these recommendations were moderately discussed in the presentation.
5 pts
Underdeveloped
• Content and purpose were not clear. • Definition and/or description of patient safety, the Patient Safety & Quality Care Movement, and the significance & recommendations of the IOM’s To Err is Human were defined but not explained. • Types and/or root causes of errors, i.e. latent, active, organizational system and technical failure(s) were not described/missing in detail. • The conceptual components of the IOM’s quality cwere for the 21st century and the significance to nursing were mildly discussed. • The author did not include a discussion about how the conceptual components of the IOM relates in his/her practice as a student or future nurse. • The IOM Quality of Health Care in America Committee’s recommendations were lightly discussed in the presentation.
0 pts
Severely Underdeveloped
• Content and purpose were not clear, defined and missing. • Definition and/or description of patient safety, the Patient Safety & Quality Care Movement, and the significance & recommendations of the IOM’s To Err is Human were not covered. • Types and/or root causes of errors, i.e. latent, active, organizational system and technical failure(s) were not described. • The conceptual components of the IOM’s quality cwere for the 21st century and the significance to nursing were not discussed. • The author did not include a discussion about how the conceptual components of the IOM relates in his/her practice as a student or future nurse. • The IOM Quality of Health Care in America Committee’s recommendations were not listed or explained in the presentation.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Organization
5 pts
Well organized
• Introduction slide describes the purpose and main idea of the presentation. • Organization was evident by the logical flow of ideas from one point and/or slide to the next. The author presented information to which the audience could follow. • Body of the presentation highlighted key concepts for clarity of important points. • Concluded with the author’s discussion of their role as a new graduate and their personal contribution to the Patient Safety & Quality Care Movement. • Key points were succinct following general guidelines for appropriate slide presentation. • Student’s graphics explained and reinforced screen text and presentation.
2.5 pts
Needs improvement
• Introduction slide moderately describes the purpose and main idea of the presentation. • Organization was moderately evident by the logical flow of ideas from one point and/or slide to the next. Audience had a mild to moderate difficulty following the presentation. • Body of the presentation moderately highlighted key concepts for clarity of important points. • Concluded with moderate amount of the author’s discussion of their role as a new graduate and their personal contribution to the Patient Safety & Quality Care Movement. • Key points were moderately succinct following general guidelines for appropriate slide presentation. • Student occasionally used graphics that rarely supported text and presentation.
0 pts
Unorganized
• Introduction slide does not describe the purpose and main idea of the presentation. • Organization was not evident by the logical flow of ideas from one point and/or slide to the next. Audience could not understand the information because there was no sequence. • Body of the presentation did not highlight key concepts for clarity of important points. • Did not conclude with the author’s discussion of their role as a new graduate and their personal contribution to the Patient Safety & Quality Care Movement. • Key points were not succinct and did not follow general guidelines for appropriate slide presentation. • Student used superfluous graphics or no graphics.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Grammar & Sentence Structure
2.5 pts
Full Marks
• Effective use of the language without errors in grammar and spelling. • Appropriate transition between slides, sections and key points.
1.5 pts
Half Mark
• Effective use of the language with three or fewer errors in grammar and spelling. • Moderately appropriate transition between slides, sections, and key points.
0 pts
No Marks
• Ineffective use of the language with more than three errors in grammar and spelling. • Inappropriate transition between slides, sections, and key points.
2.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
APA Usage/Description of Criterion
2.5 pts
Full Marks
• No APA errors throughout presentation and/or reference slide. • Minimum three references (One may be from the textbook). • No audio/video technical issues. • Presentation was very creative. • Presentation via video or voice-over-PowerPoint (recommended) was five to ten minutes in length.
1.5 pts
Half Marks
• Three or fewer APA errors throughout presentation and/or reference slide. • Two references used (One may be from the textbook). • Some audio/video technical issues. • Presentation was moderately creative. • Presentation via video or voice-over-PowerPoint (recommended) was less than five minutes in length.
0 pts
No Marks
• More than three APA errors throughout presentation and/or reference slide. • Less than two references used (One may be from the textbook). • Mulitple audio/video technical issues. • Presentation lacked creativity. • Presentation via video or voice-over-PowerPoint (recommended) was less than two minutes in length.
2.5 pts
yyyyInstitute of Medicine (IOM) Report:
To Err is Human
IOM definition of error
:
The failure of a planned action
to be completed as intended or
the use of a wrong plan to
achieve an aim.
Medical errors result in as
many as
98,000
patient deaths
per year (IOM,ThkkInstitute of Medicine (IOM) Report:
To Err is Human
IOM definition of error
:
The failure of a planned action
to be completed as intended or
the use of a wrong plandownload
download
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|