Hello their I will send the insturctions that the professor gave me for how to do the assignment I have to choose two drugs which was alcohol and tobacco
Here is the instruction
Part 2: Critical Analysis
For this section you will now analyze the 2 substances you presented in Part 1. Your analysis should contain 3 sections with headers for each subsection. Just like the previous part, you will compare and contrast the 2 substances.
Your submission will have the following topics:
1. Current use/abuse in society and current government policies or regulation. This section should include information on how each of the drugs are used similarly or differently in society, who uses them most, addiction issues, and the current governmental regulation on these substances.
2. Future use of these substances. This should include any information on changing regulation around the substances, commonality of use (increasing or decreasing) and any other pertinent information for these substances.
3. Your opinion and final analysis of these drugs. Should anything change regarding each of these substances (access, regulation, public knowledge, age limits etc.) in your opinion? What do you think about the current use in society (positive or negative)? Support your opinion with facts you find in the research portion. This section will include your speculation on what the future may hold.
The layout of Part 2 should go as follows:
Section 1: Current Use in Society
-Current use and regulation of Drug 1
-Current use and regulation of Drug 2
-Compare or contrast the use or regulation of Drug 1 and Drug 2
Section 2: Future Changes in Regulation or Use (if any apply, if none for either drug, state that and move on to next section)
-Any potential changes of Drug 1 (such as legalization, regulation, etc. if any are applicable)
-Any potential changes of Drug 2 (such as legalization, regulation, etc. if any are applicable)
-Compare or contrast any potential changes of Drug 1 and Drug 2 (if none for either drug, state that and move on to next section)
Section 3: Final Analysis
-Your final analysis/opinion of Drug 1 (should policies or use of this drug change?)
-Your final analysis/opinion of Drug 1 (should policies or use of this drug change?)
-Write a small conclusion that summarizes this paper
Other notes
Your Part 2 submission will likely be about 2-3 pages double spaced. Part 2 doesn’t need its own title page, but does need references
Just like Part 1, Other requirements:
-You must use at least 2 outside scholarly sources.
-Make sure to cite your sources, please use APA 7th edition to format your sources and your paper
Please label your sections (current use of drug 1 etc.)
You only need to submit part 2 in the submission folder, but both parts need to be posted to your discussion board for peer review with the full reference list.
Please make it clear which is Part 1 versus Part 2Part 2: Critical Analysis
For this section you will now analyze the 2 substances you presented in Part 1. Your analysis should contain 3 sections with headers for each subsection. Just like the previous part, you will compare and contrast the 2 substances.
Your submission will have the following topics:
1. Current use/abuse in society and current government policies or regulation. This section should include information on how each of the drugs are used similarly or differently in society, who uses them most, addiction issues, and the current governmental regulation on these substances.
2. Future use of these substances. This should include any information on changing regulation around the substances, commonality of use (increasing or decreasing) and any other pertinent information for these substances.
3. Your opinion and final analysis of these drugs. Should anything change regarding each of these substances (access, regulation, public knowledge, age limits etc.) in your opinion? What do you think about the current use in society (positive or negative)? Support your opinion with facts you find in the research portion. This section will include your speculation on what the future may hold.
The layout of Part 2 should go as follows:
Section 1: Current Use in Society
-Current use and regulation of Drug 1
-Current use and regulation of Drug 2
-Compare or contrast the use or regulation of Drug 1 and Drug 2
Section 2: Future Changes in Regulation or Use (if any apply, if none for either drug, state that and move on to next section)
-Any potential changes of Drug 1 (such as legalization, regulation, etc. if any are applicable)
-Any potential changes of Drug 2 (such as legalization, regulation, etc. if any are applicable)
-Compare or contrast any potential changes of Drug 1 and Drug 2 (if none for either drug, state that and move on to next section)
Section 3: Final Analysis
-Your final analysis/opinion of Drug 1 (should policies or use of this drug change?)
-Your final analysis/opinion of Drug 1 (should policies or use of this drug change?)
-Write a small conclusion that summarizes this paper
Other notes
Your Part 2 submission will likely be about 2-3 pages double spaced. Part 2 doesn’t need its own title page, but does need references
Just like Part 1, Other requirements:
-You must use at least 2 outside scholarly sources.
-Make sure to cite your sources, please use APA 7th edition to format your sources and your paper
Please label your sections (current use of drug 1 etc.)
You only need to submit part 2 in the submission folder, but both parts need to be posted to your discussion board for peer review with the full reference list.
Please make it clear which is Part 1 versus Part 2Part 2: Critical Analysis
For this section you will now analyze the 2 substances you presented in Part 1. Your analysis should contain 3 sections with headers for each subsection. Just like the previous part, you will compare and contrast the 2 substances.
Your submission will have the following topics:
1. Current use/abuse in society and current government policies or regulation. This section should include information on how each of the drugs are used similarly or differently in society, who uses them most, addiction issues, and the current governmental regulation on these substances.
2. Future use of these substances. This should include any information on changing regulation around the substances, commonality of use (increasing or decreasing) and any other pertinent information for these substances.
3. Your opinion and final analysis of these drugs. Should anything change regarding each of these substances (access, regulation, public knowledge, age limits etc.) in your opinion? What do you think about the current use in society (positive or negative)? Support your opinion with facts you find in the research portion. This section will include your speculation on what the future may hold.
The layout of Part 2 should go as follows:
Section 1: Current Use in Society
-Current use and regulation of Drug 1
-Current use and regulation of Drug 2
-Compare or contrast the use or regulation of Drug 1 and Drug 2
Section 2: Future Changes in Regulation or Use (if any apply, if none for either drug, state that and move on to next section)
-Any potential changes of Drug 1 (such as legalization, regulation, etc. if any are applicable)
-Any potential changes of Drug 2 (such as legalization, regulation, etc. if any are applicable)
-Compare or contrast any potential changes of Drug 1 and Drug 2 (if none for either drug, state that and move on to next section)
Section 3: Final Analysis
-Your final analysis/opinion of Drug 1 (should policies or use of this drug change?)
-Your final analysis/opinion of Drug 1 (should policies or use of this drug change?)
-Write a small conclusion that summarizes this paper
Other notes
Your Part 2 submission will likely be about 2-3 pages double spaced. Part 2 doesn’t need its own title page, but does need references
Just like Part 1, Other requirements:
-You must use at least 2 outside scholarly sources.
-Make sure to cite your sources, please use APA 7th edition to format your sources and your paper
Please label your sections (current use of drug 1 etc.)
You only need to submit part 2 in the submission folder, but both parts need to be posted to your discussion board for peer review with the full reference list.
Please make it clear which is Part 1 versus Part 2
Here is the rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Current Use in Society:
30 pts
Full Credit
Current use of each substance was discussed clearly and was supported by outside research and the 2 substances were somehow compared or contrasted
18 pts
Partial Credit
There was only current use listed for one substance and/or there was no comparison between the two substances
0 pts
No Points
There was no clear current use in society section
/ 30 pts
Future Use
30 pts
Full Credit
Any relevant changes in policy were discussed, a solid speculation from the student was shared about what the future of these substances hold with supporting evidence and the 2 substances were compared or contrasted
18 pts
Partial Credit
There was limited information from the student about the future use of one or both substances with limited or no comparisons
0 pts
No Points
There was no clear section about the future use of these substances
/ 30 pts
Final Analysis
30 pts
Full Credit
A clear and well-formed argument is presented that analyzes the current use in society of both substances and compares or contrasts whether the status quo should remain or change regarding both substances
18 pts
Partial Credit
There is limited information in the final analysis section about one or both substances and/or the 2 substances are not compared
0 pts
No Points
There is no clear final analysis section
/ 30 pts
Sources
20 pts
Full Credit
At least 2 outside sources were used that are scholarly academic level sources, both sources are cited accurately including the use of in-text citations
12 pts
Partial Credit
There were 2 clear sources used but there were either no or very limited in-text citations or there was an issue with the citation method
0 pts
No Points
There were less than 2 obvious sources used or they were not listed
/ 20 ptsCriteria Ratings Pts
Current Use in Society:
30 pts
Full Credit
Current use of each substance was discussed clearly and was supported by outside research and the 2 substances were somehow compared or contrasted
18 pts
Partial Credit
There was only current use listed for one substance and/or there was no comparison between the two substances
0 pts
No Points
There was no clear current use in society section
/ 30 pts
Future Use
30 pts
Full Credit
Any relevant changes in policy were discussed, a solid speculation from the student was shared about what the future of these substances hold with supporting evidence and the 2 substances were compared or contrasted
18 pts
Partial Credit
There was limited information from the student about the future use of one or both substances with limited or no comparisons
0 pts
No Points
There was no clear section about the future use of these substances
/ 30 pts
Final Analysis
30 pts
Full Credit
A clear and well-formed argument is presented that analyzes the current use in society of both substances and compares or contrasts whether the status quo should remain or change regarding both substances
18 pts
Partial Credit
There is limited information in the final analysis section about one or both substances and/or the 2 substances are not compared
0 pts
No Points
There is no clear final analysis section
/ 30 pts
Sources
20 pts
Full Credit
At least 2 outside sources were used that are scholarly academic level sources, both sources are cited accurately including the use of in-text citations
12 pts
Partial Credit
There were 2 clear sources used but there were either no or very limited in-text citations or there was an issue with the citation method
0 pts
No Points
There were less than 2 obvious sources used or they were not listed
/ 20 ptsCriteria Ratings Pts
Current Use in Society:
30 pts
Full Credit
Current use of each substance was discussed clearly and was supported by outside research and the 2 substances were somehow compared or contrasted
18 pts
Partial Credit
There was only current use listed for one substance and/or there was no comparison between the two substances
0 pts
No Points
There was no clear current use in society section
/ 30 pts
Future Use
30 pts
Full Credit
Any relevant changes in policy were discussed, a solid speculation from the student was shared about what the future of these substances hold with supporting evidence and the 2 substances were compared or contrasted
18 pts
Partial Credit
There was limited information from the student about the future use of one or both substances with limited or no comparisons
0 pts
No Points
There was no clear section about the future use of these substances
/ 30 pts
Final Analysis
30 pts
Full Credit
A clear and well-formed argument is presented that analyzes the current use in society of both substances and compares or contrasts whether the status quo should remain or change regarding both substances
18 pts
Partial Credit
There is limited information in the final analysis section about one or both substances and/or the 2 substances are not compared
0 pts
No Points
There is no clear final analysis section
/ 30 pts
Sources
20 pts
Full Credit
At least 2 outside sources were used that are scholarly academic level sources, both sources are cited accurately including the use of in-text citations
12 pts
Partial Credit
There were 2 clear sources used but there were either no or very limited in-text citations or there was an issue with the citation method
0 pts
No Points
There were less than 2 obvious sources used or they were not listed
/ 20 pts
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|