Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, read Chapters 12 and 13 in the textbook, Juvenile Justice Administrator Perspective: Reframing Reentry Around Positive Youth Outcome Links to an external site., and Making Room for Juvenile Justice: The Supreme Court’s Decision in Montgomery v. LouisianaLinks to an external site..
Within juvenile justice, the prosecutors have broad discretionary powers pertaining to which cases are brought before a court for formal adjudication. This prosecutorial discretion has been the source of much debate. Some scholars and media personnel maintain that prosecutors weigh far too many external variables extraneous to the specifics of a case in the decision of whether to bring a case before a court. Others assert that the discretionary powers of a prosecutor are intended to allow an attorney to weigh as many factors as are relevant as they make decisions regarding to the disposition of cases.
Using the Peak (2016) text, examine the debate surrounding discretionary decision making. State your view on whether prosecutorial discretionary decision making should perhaps be limited. Additionally, state whether you believe it serves the purpose of justice for a prosecutor to consider facts external to the specifics of a case in their decision to prosecute an offender.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|