Please view this video:
Joint Commission Standard MS 01.01.01 Specifies Requirements for Medical Staff https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODgad-RYf-s
Kozusko, S. D., Elkwood, L., Gaynor, D., & Chagares, S. A. (2016). An innovative approach to the surgical time out: A patient-focused model. Association of Operating Room Nurses.AORN Journal, 103(6), 617-622. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2016.04.001.
For this you are to examine a specific standard, guideline or criteria presented in the accreditation standards. Each module will require that you examine a specific standard, guideline or criteria related to the primary topic for each module. The selection of the standard, guideline or criteria is determined by the student.
The specific purpose of this is that as graduate-level students you should develop your critical thinking abilities. This is intended to develop and challenge your ability to think critically and learn how to challenge the basis of standards for health care.
Assignment Expectations
Submit a 4- to 5-page paper that covers the following:
Part 1: For this Module please complete the following tasks for a specific standard, guideline or criteria supporting Patient-Focused Functions:
Identification of the specific standard, guideline or criteria.
Present the exact standard, guideline or criteria that will be critiqued in the Module.
Review and examine the facts and data supporting the standard, guideline or criteria. (Focus on the scientific information, research data, and findings of professional groups.
Critique and analyze the body of information that you have researched and developed for the selected standard, guideline or criteria.
Present your findings and opinion on the adequacy of the selected standard, guideline or criteria.
List of references.
Part 2: For this Module please complete the following tasks for a specific standard, guideline or criteria supporting Hospital – Organization Functions:
Identification of the specific standard, guideline or criteria.
Present the exact standard, guideline or criteria that will be critiqued in the Module.
Review and examine the facts and data supporting the standard, guideline or criteria. (Focus on the scientific information, research data, and findings of professional groups.
Critique and analyze the body of information that you have researched and developed for the selected standard, guideline or criteria.
Present your findings and opinion on the adequacy of the selected standard, guideline or criteria.
List of references.
Readings:
Bardsley, M. (2017). Learning how to make routinely available data useful in guiding regulatory oversight of hospital care. BMJ Quality & Safety, 26(2), 90.
Chazal, R. A., & Houser, S. (2016). The ACC and AHA. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 68(24), 2708-2709.
Hut-Mossel, L., Welker, G., Ahaus, K., & Gans, R. (2017). Understanding how and why audits work: Protocol for a realist review of audit programmes to improve hospital care. BMJ Open, 7(6)
Knopf, A. (2016). 10 steps to prepare for accreditation. Behavioral Healthcare, 36(4), 24-25.
Knopf, A. (2016). Examine the trends in accreditation. Behavioral Healthcare, 36(4), 22-25.
Ornstein, C. (2017). Secret data on hospital inspections may soon become public. Washington: NPR.
Science; Study results from university hospital update understanding of quality control science (ISO 15189-accredited laboratories fulfill the JCI hospital accreditation standard requirements for the use of referral laboratories: Report of a consensus …). (2016). Science Letter, 1413.
The importance of avoiding denial of accreditation. (2016). Briefings on Accreditation and Quality, 27(9), 1-4.
The Joint Commission introduces revised pain assessment and management standard for accredited hospitals. (2017). Professional Services Close – Up.
Wickersham, M. E., & Basey, S. (2016). Is accreditation sufficient? A case study and argument for transparency when government regulatory authority is delegated. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 39(2), 245-282.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|
