Weaknesses and Strengths in “Machiavelli’s Realism by Grant B. Mindle

You should spend roughly 500 words on the strengths, 750 words on the weaknesses, and 250 words on the recommendations for future research. You should identify at least two strengths, at least three weaknesses, and two recommendations for future research. In discussing the article/book’s strengths, for example, you might discuss the novelty or rigor of its theory or methods, especially in comparison with other work. Alternatively, you might discuss its assessment of competing hypotheses or any ways in which it usefully speaks to ongoing political or theoretical debates. In discussing the weaknesses, you might mention, e.g., any limitations in the methods or data, any alternative explanations it fails to adequately anticipate and rebut, or any unconvincing assumptions it makes. On both strengths and weaknesses, you ought to emphasize substance rather than style. (Clarity of writing or figures may indeed be a strength of a piece, but that’s not what I’m looking for here.)
In providing recommendations for future research on the topic of your chosen article/book, you might focus on, e.g., additional data that could be gathered, plausible alternative hypotheses that could be tested, or different approaches that could be taken to the same basic question.

Last Completed Projects