Do you agree with the current prohibition of strikes for all public-sector employees?

This week’s content discussed arbitration for grievance purposes and public-sector unions. Consider and comment on the following questions:
1. Given the complexity of modern arbitration proceedings, do you think that professional legal representation for both unions and employers should be required? Why or why not?
2. Do you agree with the current prohibition of strikes for all public-sector employees? Should the government relax these rules and allow for worker strikes in certain non-essential occupations? Explain your answer.

POST ONE
I hope that everyone has done well this far. Eight weeks has sure flown by quickly. This week we were asked if the complexity of modern arbitration proceedings, do you think that professional legal representation for both unions and employers should be required. A common complaint is that arbitrators and especially arbitration agencies are biased. They may solicit business from companies, which are more likely to retain their services again if the arbitrator produces a favorable result. An arbitrator who is already embedded in an industry may be more sympathetic to an entity in that industry than to a consumer (“Arbitration,” 2019). I believe that have legal representation is the best option when dealing with the legalities of each situation. Certain states have different rule and it is best to have someone who is well versed in order to get to the best possible outcome. Having representation will allow for a non-biased decision and will allow for a better flow of communication back and forth.
I do agree with the prohibition of strikes on the public sector. There are many jobs that are required because they are an integral part of our success. If members of an electric company decided to strike after a winter storm, there are many members who could be at harm if they cannot keep their houses warm. These members are also paid through the public for a service that is needed. I do not feel the government should relax and allow for workers who are currently in non-essential occupations to strike. This should be equal throughout the group. Allowing one group to strike and not the other could raise more tension and cause members to continually push towards strikes.

Last Completed Projects