What specific skills did you use during the engagement phase?

This paper draws upon the student’s skill-building experience as either 1) the family social worker. In this assignment, the student will analyze each phase of the social work process in which he/she engaged during one of the skill-building exercises.

To complete this assignment, please respond to the following:

Engagement: What specific skills did you use during the engagement phase?
Assessment: What techniques and/or tools did you employ to conduct the assessment?
Planning: Describe the planning and contracting in which you and the client engaged?
Intervention (and/or Prevention): Discuss the intervention strategies you (and the client) employed? Identify whether this phase of the process would be described as prevention or intervention and discuss the rationale for your choice.
Evaluation: Discuss how you and your client evaluated (or would evaluate) the effectiveness of the social work process?
Termination: What tasks of termination did you use at the end of the social work process?
Form: The student has the option of completing this paper as a narrative or as a substantive response to each of the questions. Anticipated length of paper: Five to seven pages, typewritten and double-spaced, with appropriate references. Remember – you must use academic sources to back up your case conceptualization and planning.

Rubric
Social Work Process Analysis
Social Work Process Analysis
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome1. Engagement – noted specific skills used with family/group
5 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Very Good
3 pts
Good
2 pts
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Needs Significant Improvement
0 pts
Not Completed
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2. Assessment-noted skills and tools specific to families/groups
5 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Very Good
3 pts
Good
2 pts
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Needs Significant Improvement
0 pts
Not Completed
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3. Planning- described the plan and contract developed (or could have been developed) preferably, in measurable language
5 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Very Good
3 pts
Good
2 pts
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Needs Significant Improvement
0 pts
Not Completed
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome4. Intervention/Prevention – discussed strategies used (or could have been used), whether it was intervention or prevention, discussed the rationale for the choice
5 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Very Good
3 pts
Good
2 pts
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Needs Significant Improvement
0 pts
Not Completed
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome5. Evaluation- discussed ways in which the intervention was (or could be) evaluated with the client
5 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Very Good
3 pts
Good
2 pts
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Needs Significant Improvement
0 pts
Not Completed
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome6. Termination- described skills used
5 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Very Good
3 pts
Good
2 pts
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Needs Significant Improvement
0 pts
Not Completed
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome7. Distinguished, appraised, and integrated multiple sources of knowledge, including research-based knowledge, and practice wisdom (2.1.3.1)
5 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Very Good
3 pts
Good
2 pts
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Needs Significant Improvement
0 pts
Not Completed
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome8. Analyze models of assessment, prevention, intervention & evaluation (2.1.3.2)
5 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Very Good
3 pts
Good
2 pts
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Needs Significant Improvement
0 pts
Not Completed
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome9. Used Standard English; used appropriate citations and references. Demonstrated effective written communication in working with individuals, families, groups, organizations, communities, and colleagues (2.1.3.4)
5 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Very Good
3 pts
Good
2 pts
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Needs Significant Improvement
0 pts
Not Completed
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome10. Used research evidence to inform practice (2.1.6.2)
5 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Very Good
3 pts
Good
2 pts
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Needs Significant Improvement
0 pts
Not Completed
5 pts
Total Points: 50

Last Completed Projects