Do you think Rawls’s hypothetical Veil Of Ignorance is complementary to Kant’s framework?

The question is:
Do you think Rawls’s hypothetical Veil Of Ignorance is complementary to Kant’s framework?
Include at least one quotation to support your answer from the book.

This is notes from lecture: To review, here are some explanations of Rawlsian theory from Stanford’s site: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rawls/(Links to an external site.)
…that the fact that a citizen is of a certain race, class, and gender is no reason for social institutions to favor or disfavor her. Each representative in the original position is therefore deprived of knowledge of the race, class, and gender of the real citizen that they represent. In fact, the veil of ignorance deprives the parties of all facts about citizens that are irrelevant to the choice of principles of justice: not only facts about their race, class, and gender but also facts about their age, natural endowments, and more. Moreover the veil of ignorance also screens out specific information about what society is like right now, so as to get a clearer view of the permanent features of a just social system. (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry) (Links to an external site.)https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rawls/
The essay also states that Rawls believed:
A decent hierarchical society’s basic structure specifies a decent system of social cooperation. First, it secures a core list of human rights. Second, its political system takes the fundamental interests of all persons into account through a decent consultation hierarchy. This means that the government genuinely consults with the representatives of all social groups, which together represent all persons in the society, and that the government justifies its laws and policies to these groups. (Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy entry) (Links to an external site.)https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rawls/
Lastly, the essay reminds us that Rawls suggested:
The deepest questions of religion, philosophy, and morality are very difficult even for conscientious people to think through. People will answer these questions in different ways because of their own particular life experiences (their upbringing, class, occupation, and so on). Reasonable citizens understand that these deep issues are ones on which people of good will can disagree, and so will be unwilling to impose their own worldviews on those who have reached conclusions different than their own. (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry)https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rawls/

I am sending the book as a file upload.

Last Completed Projects