Prepare a 5 – 6 double-spaced page research report in APA format using four (4) scholarly sources that objectively analyzes differing sides of a controversial issue. The paper should include an introduction that briefly describes the controversial issue being researched, an issue analysis that objectively discusses differing perspectives on the issue, and conclusions and recommendations supported by research findings.
I have attached my other writings on the topic, please expand upon my paper please.
Length: Due: Value: Post:
Research Project Paper ***Signature Assignment***
Paper: 5 – 6 double-spaced pages (excluding title and reference pages) Week 7 by Sunday Midnight
250 Points for 25% of the grade
Week 7 Assignments
Prepare and submit through Turnitin by Sunday midnight, a 5 – 6 double-spaced page research report (excluding title and reference pages) in APA format using four (4) scholarly sources that objectively analyzes differing sides of a controversial issue.
To format and prepare the paper, include the following sections:
Title Page
Introduction: Briefly describe the controversial issue being researched (1 pages); discuss why the
issue is controversial and the value of your research.
Issue Analysis: Research Brandmans virtual library to locate and objectively analyze 4 scholarly
articles that present both sides of the issue. In your analysis, describe the differing perspectives discussing the evidence provided to support each; identify any assumptions or fallacies in the arguments (2 – 3 pages)
Conclusions and Recommendations: Based on your research findings, discuss your assessment of the issue including points of agreement and disagreement; support your analysis describing your conclusions and recommendations on the controversial issue with citations from your research (2 pages)
References
Evaluation Criteria for Research Project
Paper Elements Exemplary
Proficient
Developing
Emerging
Assignment Analysis
35
Accurate and in-depth understanding of the assignment with a consistent emphasis on objectively analyzing both sides of a controversial issue. Contains all of the elements listed in the assignment requirements.
30
Fairly accurately understands the assignment; emphasis on objectively analyzing both sides of a controversial issue. One element of the assignment may be superficially done.
25
Somewhat understands the assignment; analysis of controversial issue may be somewhat one-sided and/or biased. One element of the assignment may be missing
20
Limited understanding of the assignment; analysis of controversial issue lacks objectivity and is biased. Two or more elements of the assignment may be missing.
Issue Analysis
80
Comprehensively and objectively analyzes and discusses differing perspectives on the controversial issue. Includes evidence for both views, and identifies all assumptions and/or fallacies.
70
Clearly and fairly objectively analyzes and discusses differing perspectives on the controversial issue. Includes evidence for both views, and identifies most assumptions and/or fallacies.
60
Somewhat discusses differing perspectives on the controversial issue although analysis may not be objective. Includes some evidence but may not identify assumptions and/or fallacies.
50
Biased discussion of the controversial issue. Evidence is provided to support only one perspective. May not identify assumptions and/or fallacies.
Conclusions and 70
60
50
40
Recommendation
Objectively analyzes research on the controversial issue to draw valid conclusions supported by findings Fully assesses points of agreement and/or disagreement to draw conclusions and make recommendations.
Fairly objectively analyzes research on the controversial issue to draw conclusions usually supported by findings. Assesses most points of agreement and/or disagreement to draw conclusions and make recommendations.
Somewhat analyzes research on the controversial issue and presents conclusions somewhat supported by the findings. May not assess points of agreement and/or disagreement or draw conclusions and make recommendations.
Limited if any analysis or using research to draw conclusions. Uses personal opinion to present conclusions and recommendations on the controversial issue.
APA and Sources
35
Uses 4 or more scholarly sources that present differing perspectives to examine the controversial issue Accurately adhere to APA standards; reference page and citations are correct.
30
Uses 4 scholarly sources that present differing perspectives to examine the controversial issue APA standards are followed with a few (2 3) minor errors.
25
Uses 4 sources that present differing perspectives to examine the controversial issue although 1 may not be scholarly. APA standards are followed but with numerous errors.
20
Uses less than 4 sources and/or 2 or more arent scholarly. May not identify sources with differing perspectives. Limited adherence to APA standards
Writing Mechanics
30
The paper is logical and well-written; spelling, grammar and punctuation are accurate. Paper is the required length of 5 6 pages of content, and includes correctly prepared title page.
26
The paper is logical and well-written but with minor (1 3) errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. The content may be 5% longer or shorter than the required length, and includes title page, abstract, TOC, and.
22
The paper is somewhat logical and well-written; some errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. The content be 10% too long or short, and may not include a correctly prepared title page
18
The paper lacks clarity and may be confusing with numerous errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. The content may be 15% too long or short, and may not include a title page
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|