Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

Review the modular structure of this course and reflect on how each
module defines the specific skills needed as an advanced Nurse
Practitioner (NP).
Review the ANA guidelines, NP competencies, and the Ethic resources
found in this week’s Learning Resources and consider how they impact the
work of the NP.

By Day 3

Post a brief explanation about the differences
in roles related to a CRNP, a CNM, and a PA and how each of these roles
might impact the how you practice as a FNP. Be specific and provide
examples.

Excellent
Point range: 90–100

Good
Point range: 80–89

Fair
Point range: 70–79

Poor
Point range: 0–69
Main Posting:

Response to the discussion question is reflective
with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained
from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

Points Range:
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s).

Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of
knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current
credible sources.

No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least 3 current credible sources.

Points Range:
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to most of the discussion question(s).

Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis
representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the
module.

50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least 3 credible references.

Points Range:
31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references.

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s).

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only 1 or no credible references.
Main Posting:

Writing

Points Range:
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Written clearly and concisely.

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.

Further adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Points Range:
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Written concisely.

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Points Range:
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Written somewhat concisely.

May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Posting:

Timely and full participation

Points Range:
9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts main discussion by due date.

Points Range:
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Posts main discussion by due date.

Meets requirements for full participation.

Points Range:
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Posts main discussion by due date.

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post main discussion by due date.

Last Completed Projects

topic title academic level Writer delivered