Abstract Architecture is meaningless

The topic I have chosen is “Abstract Architecture is meaningless”
The buildings I have chosen are: 1. Finlandia Hall by Alvar Aalto 2. Villa at Garches by Le Corbusier 3. The Bauhaus by Walter Gropius
Reference style: Chicago 16th with footnotes and page numbers please.
I have uploaded the essay question and notes from the lectures.

Thank you!
You can use the file I have attached (Order 1608084 abstract architecture) in writing or it might be helpful because two of the buildings there have been mentioned
on how they deny the statement.

You can add other sources than the ones I have mentioned if you think they are relevant. Thank you
Please stick to the main topic.
3. Building 1 (450 words, how/why The Finlandia Hall by Alvar Aalto goes against the statement”Abstract architecture is meaningless” and actually proves that it is not meaningless)
4. Building 2 (450 words, how/why Villa at Garches by Le Corbusier goes against the statement “Abstract architecture is meaningless” and actually proves that it is not meaningless)
5. building 3 (450 words, how/why The Bauhaus by Walter Gropius supports the statement that Abstract architecture is actually meaningless)

Please use Rowe and Slutzky’s Literal and Phenomenal Transparency PDF &P Porphyrios Heterotopia PDF to support your arguments when proving why each building denies or confirms the statement “Abstract architecture is meaningless.

Last Completed Projects