Do you think the United States has the best health care system in the world?

For this activity you will be divided into groups by your instructor, using the 8 questions regarding healthcare reform prepare an argument for or against. Please include at least 2 scholarly sources to support your argument. This will be an in-class debate. PRO ARGUMENT
Do you think the United States has the best health care system in the world?
Do you support making the U.S. health care system more like that of other countries? Yes or No
What have we (the United States of America) gained by changing to the current health care system?
What would we lose by changing away from the current health care system (proposed legislation)?
What should be the role of the federal government in the health care market?
Who should regulate the health care industry in the United States?
How should questions of overall system effectiveness (efficiency, quality of health care, access and sustainability) be addressed for universal coverage?
What are some of the impediments to implementing U.S. health care reforms?
Following the debate, you will upload your responses to the questions or talking points along with your references. Please see the rubric for additional details on completion.
Rubric
NUR 333 Healthcare Reform Debate
NUR 333 Healthcare Reform Debate
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDebate
60 pts
Level 4
Spoke clearly and free of slang. Composed and was respectful of other students
45 pts
Level 3
Spoke clearly while mostly being free of slang. Stayed composed and was respectful of other students.
30 pts
Level 2
Difficult to understand at times with use of slang. Student became uncomposed occasionally but remained respectful
15 pts
Level 1
Mumbling or did not speak adequately. Student became uncomposed at times but remained respectful.
0 pts
Level 0
Student either did not speak or was disrespectful and argued with other students rather than debate.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent and Rationale
30 pts
Level 4
Content was thorough and detailed providing strong rationale backed by evidence.
22.5 pts
Level 3
Content was thorough with most details provided. Rationale provided backed by some evidence.
15 pts
Level 2
Content was lacking some detail. Rationales provided were based mostly off opinion rather than evidence.
7.5 pts
Level 1
Content was severely lacking detail and rationales were not backed by evidence or inappropriate.
0 pts
Level 0
Content was absent and rationales were not provided to discussion points.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Language
4 pts
Level 4
Excellent use and control of language. Superior use of style and variety provided in a professional tone.
3 pts
Level 3
Good use and control of language. Minor (<2) errors with use of style with some variety provided. Professional tone maintained throughout. 2 pts Level 2 Average use and control of language. Some (3-5) errors or misuse of style with minimal variety. Professional tone maintained throughout. 1 pts Level 1 Below average use and control of language. Significant (>5) errors or misuses of style with no variety. Professional tone not maintained throughout assignment.
0 pts
Level 0
Significant issues with use and control of language. Style and variety unable to be determined with no professional tone.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting
3 pts
Level 4
Formatting follows assignment directions (APA as required) used with no errors. Citations provided (if necessary) with no errors.
2.25 pts
Level 3
Formatting follows assignment directions (APA as required) with minimal (<2) errors. Citations provided (if necessary) with minimal (<2) errors. 1.5 pts Level 2 Formatting mostly follows assignment directions (APA as required) with some (3-5) errors. Citations (if necessary) provided with some (3-5) errors. 0.75 pts Level 1 Formatting (APA as required) errors (>5) make following the assignment difficult. Citations (if necessary) mostly provided with significant (>5) errors.
0 pts
Level 0
Formatting does not follow assignment directions. Significant errors make formatting illegible. Citations (if necessary) do not follow APA format.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly/Professional Composition
3 pts
Level 4
Expert level of writing with little to no errors.
2.25 pts
Level 3
Good level of writing with minimal (<2) errors. 1.5 pts Level 2 Average level of writing with some (3-5) errors. 0.75 pts Level 1 Below average level of writing with significant (>5) errors.
0 pts
Level 0
Level of writing is far below what is expected for scholarly/professional composition.
3 pts
Total Points: 100

Last Completed Projects