Perform a 2-3 page double spaced write-up comparing two articles and arguing which one is more credible and why.
Here is the link for the two articles:
1- https://money.com/coronavirus-contract-tracing-jobs/
2- https://www.huffpost.com/entry/anthony-fauci-ron-desantis-covid-19-vaccine-response_n_61374f52e4b0aac9c01bb26e
1.) Offer an introductory statement that introduces the articles, gives a brief description of what they are about, and state which one is more credible and why.
2.) In 2-3 (or more) paragraphs, choose the 2-3 strongest criteria to make your case. What I mean by criteria is: 1.) author’s background, 2.) website reputation, 3.) evidence used, 4.) article’s purpose, 5.) tone and presentation. You don’t need to touch on all of these criteria, but only the ones that you have more to say about. Make sure to includes details for evidence. In making your case , make sure to make direct comparisons between the two articles.
Keep in mind the following:
You are NOT making an argument about the topic, but rather you are making an argument as to which source is more credible and why. Don’t base your argument on whether you agree or disagree with the source’s perspective. You can have a source you disagree with although it makes a convincing case – and you can have a source with a perspective you agree with but is total crap!
None of the links provided is “fake news.” They can all be considered “credible” on some level. You are not playing “find the fake one.”
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|