Are ideas supported by further research beyond finding retellings of the myth?

The paper must use a pre-submitted bibliography. The paper should have good use of in-text citations.

Sources:

Asatiani, Valeri. “The Argonaut Myth in the Byzantine Literature.”
PHASIS 10.2 (2007): 9-13. Graves, Robert.

Greek Gods and Heroes: For Young Readers. Rosetta Books, 2014.

Šašel Kos, M. “/Br>”;. Studia Mythologica Slavica, vol. 1, May 2015,
pp. 169-82, doi:10.3986/sms.v1i0.1872.

Dobravec, J. “/Br>”;. Studia Mythologica Slavica, vol. 21, Oct. 2018, pp. 129-45,

Kropej, Monika. “Supernatural Beings from Slovenian Myth and Folktales.”
Studia mythologica-Slavica – Supplementa (2013): n. pag. Web.

The paper
will be graded according to the following Rubric:
Content/
Support of Ideas (40%):
Has the paper addressed the
potential meanings of the mythological creature and/or its myths?
Have there been connections
made to other concepts explored in the class for interpreting myth-
exploring their larger, existential questions?
Has the creature been
analyzed as a symbol?
Are ideas supported by further
research beyond finding retellings of the myth?
Research
(20%):
Is the paper using quality
research from reliable sources?
Are quotes being used to
support ideas?
Is there a range of research
material being used, not just from one source?
Citations/
Works Cited (10%):
Has research been cited with
in paper parenthetical citations? (https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guide/mla_in_text_citations_the_basics.html)
Is the Works Cited page
included and done correctly?
Have issues raised in the
earlier Bibliography Assignment been addressed? (be sure to look at
comments for that assignment)
Grammar/
Structure (30%)
Is there a clear structure to
the paper with a defined Introduction, Thesis, Supporting Paragraphs and
Conclusion?
Is attention to grammar and
editing made with few errors?

Last Completed Projects