Arundel Partners Written case Study

Each group will prepare a written report for 1 case study. The report should be LESS than (< or =) five pages (including one cover page), double-spaced, and should contain the group's answers to the case questions. The first page should include the title of the case and member names. The report will begin with a one-paragraph summary of the main issue related to the case and recommend a course of action to address the issue. The summary should be followed by answers to the assigned case questions. The answers should be rigorous, concise, and non-repetitive. As a reader, I would also appreciate good writing skills. All spreadsheet printouts should be in the appendix, but graphs and tables can be part of the case write-up. Group case reports should be submitted to Blackboard by the deadlines listed on t e course calendar 1. Does it make sense to use DCF to value sequel rights? Explain. (20 points) 2. Why do the principals of Arundel Partners think they can make money buying movie sequel rights? Why do the partners want to buy a portfolio of rights in advance rather than negotiating film-by-film to buy them? (20 points) 3. Estimate the per-film value of a portfolio of sequel rights such as Arundel proposes to buy. [There are several ways to approach this problem, all of which require some part of the dataset in Exhibits 6-9. You may find it helpful to consult the Appendix, which explains how these figures were prepared. ] (40 points) 4. What problems or disagreements would you expect Arundel and a major studio to encounter in the course of a relationship like that described in the case? What contractual terms and provisions should Arundel insist on? (20 points)

Last Completed Projects