Write a case study centered around a topic or criminal suspect of your choosing.

Write a case study centered around a topic or criminal suspect of your choosing.  Choice of crimes/incidents should be chosen based on convictions and charges pressed by criminal justice system. All subjects need to be approved by me no later than November 13th 2023. You will be responsible for providing demographic and contextual information about the subject, victims, and crime. A thorough exploration of the developmental upbring of subject and family dynamic is also required. Finally, you will provide an ideal treatment plan based on the type of crime as well as the personality of the subject. A clear, concise, and well written paper will be 6 to 8 pages long, double-spaced, and in Times New Roman 12-point font. Papers must be uploaded to Blackboard by 11:59 pm on December 18th, 2023. You will be graded on the following criteria: Accurate description of crime: 10 points · Provide an accurate account of the crime including type of crime, year of occurrence, victim/s of crime, cause of arrest, and what charges subject faced. Description of demographic information: 10 points · Demographic information about the character is provided including mental health diagnoses, educational background, victimization history, previous criminal history (if any). Description of developmental background: 10 points · Contextual information regarding suspects upbringing, family demographics, upbringing etc. Treatment plan: 15 points · Grading will be based on your ability to argue come up with a treatment plan based on the type of crime and personality type of subject. Treatment plans should also include accurate use of measures in order to assess personality, aggression, malingering, mental state, etc. Formatting, spelling and grammar 5 points · Your paper should be free of spelling and grammatical errors. · Your paper should also be double-spaced with 1-inch margins, be in 12-point Times New Roman font. Please use headers! · Paper needs to follow APA Format. This includes o A Cover Page o Reference Page o In Text Citations

Write a study on the topic of Practice Analysis of the Influence of Nursing History on Current Professional Practice.

Write a study on the topic of Practice Analysis of the Influence of Nursing History on Current Professional Practice. Use Alicia’s NR39 file to answer Wk6 template answer Phase 3: Reflection Paper is a typed paper in APA format including: Double-spaced, font and type size consistent with APA manual Title Page adheres to Chamberlain and APA standards. Content and headings as below and on the rubric: Introduction (include Introduction content, but no heading) Reflection on Learning from Nurse’s Answers( from Phase 2 Reflection paper) Insight Gained from Conversation Regarding Leadership, Provision of Care, and/or Evidence-Based Practice Analysis of the Impact of Nursing History on Professional Practice Today and in the Future Conclusion Length: Approximately 3 double-spaced pages excluding the Title Page; 800-1000 words required in the body of the paper. No outside sources will be used. No citations or references. No Reference page needed. Excellent mechanics of scholarly writing, including spelling, grammar, structure, paragraphing, and punctuation. RUBRIC: Course Project Phase 3 Course Project Phase 3 Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle Page, margins, font, headings, spacing, and length of body of paper 1. Title page meets APA and Chamberlain criteria. 2. Margins, font, headings, and spacing meet APA and assignment criteria. 3. Body of paper (excluding Title Page) is 800-1000 words. 25 pts All criteria met 1. Title page meets APA and Chamberlain criteria. 2. Margins, font, headings, and spacing meet APA and assignment criteria. 3. Body of paper (excluding Title Page) is 800-1000 words. 22 pts All criteria exist but there are minor errors. 20 pts Omits or has major errors in one of the three criteria. 10 pts Omits or has major errors in two of the three criteria. 0 pts Omits all of the three criteria. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction Student clearly explains content to be presented in the paper including each of the three main content areas. 25 pts All criteria met Student clearly explains content to be presented in the paper including each of the three main content areas. 22 pts Student somewhat clearly explains content to be presented in the paper including each of the three main content areas. 20 pts Student vaguely explains content to be presented in the paper OR includes fewer than three main content areas. 10 pts Student poorly explains content to be presented in the paper AND includes fewer than two main content areas. 0 pts Omits all criteria. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection on Learning from the Nurse’s Answers Student provides well-organized section reflecting on learning from the Selected Nurse’s answers 45 pts Criteria met. Student provides well-organized section reflecting on learning from the Selected Nurse’s answers 40 pts Student provides somewhat organized section reflecting on some of the learning from the Selected Nurse’s answers 36 pts Student provides fairly organized section OR reflects little on the learning from the Selected Nurse’s answers 17 pts Student provides minimally organized section AND reflects little on the learning from the Selected Nurse’s answers 0 pts Omits criteria 45 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInsight Gained from Conversation Regarding Leadership, Provision of Care, and/or Evidence-Based Practice Student provides well organized and clear explanation of insight gained from the Conversation (Phase 2) regarding at least one of the following: leadership, provision of care, and/or evidence-based practice. 45 pts All criteria met Student provides well organized and clear explanation of insight gained from the Conversation (Phase 2) regarding at least one of the following: leadership, provision of care, and/or evidence-based practice. 40 pts Student provides somewhat organized and mostly clear explanation of insight gained from the Conversation (Phase 2) regarding at least one of the following: leadership, provision of care, and/or evidence-based practice. 36 pts Student provides fairly organized and fairly clear explanation of insight gained from the Conversation (Phase 2) regarding at least one of the following: leadership, provision of care, and/or evidence-based practice. 17 pts Student provides minimally organized and poor explanation of insight gained from the Conversation (Phase 2) OR does not include at least one of the following: leadership, provision of care, and/or evidence-based practice. 0 pts Omits all criteria. 45 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of the Impact of Nursing History on Professional Practice Today and in the Future 1. Student analyzes the impact nursing history has on professional nursing practice today in a thorough and clear manner. 2. Student analyzes the impact nursing history will have on professional nursing practice in the future in a thorough and clear manner. 45 pts All criteria met 1. Student analyzes the impact nursing history has on professional nursing practice today in a thorough and clear manner. 2. Student analyzes the impact nursing history will have on professional nursing practice in the future in a thorough and clear manner. 40 pts Student analyzes the impact nursing history has on professional nursing practice today with minor clarity issues. Student analyzes the impact nursing history will have on professional nursing practice in the future with minor clarity issues 36 pts Student analyzes the impact nursing history has on professional nursing practice today with several clarity issues. Student analyzes the impact nursing history will have on professional nursing practice in the future with several clarity issues. 17 pts Omits one of the two criteria. 0 pts Omits all criteria. 45 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion 1. Student clearly writes a concise summary of this paper. 2. Student clearly writes strong a concluding statement. 25 pts All criteria met 1. Student clearly writes a concise summary of this paper. 2. Student clearly writes strong a concluding statement. 22 pts All criteria exist but one of the criteria lacks clarity 20 pts All criteria exist but both of the criteria lack clarity. 10 pts Omits one of the two criteria. 0 pts Omits all criteria. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and Organization Excellent mechanics and organization with minimal errors of the following: 1. well organized and logical, 2. correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling, 3. professional wording is used, 4. uses complete sentences, paragraphs are linked together logically, and main ideas expressed 15 pts All four criteria are included. Excellent mechanics and organization with minimal errors of the following: 1. well organized and logical, 2. correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling, 3. professional wording is used, 4. uses complete sentences, paragraphs are linked together logically, and main ideas expressed 13 pts Omits one of the four criteria. 12 pts Omits two of the four criteria. 6 pts Omits three of the four criteria. 0 pts Omits all of the four criteria. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction 0 pts 0 points deducted Submitted on time 0 pts Not Submitted on Time – Points Deducted (5% per day) 1 day late= 11.25 deduction; 2 days late= 22.5 deduction; 3 days late= 33.75 deduction; 4 days late= 45 deduction; 5 days late= 56.25 deduction; 6 days late= 67.5 deduction; 7 days late= 78.75 deduction 0 pts Total Points: 225

Discuss and development of a Framework for Recommendation Algorithms in E-Commerce Applications.

Discuss and development of a Framework for Recommendation Algorithms in E-Commerce Applications. https://unipub.uni-graz.at/obvugrhs/download/pdf/3591178?originalFilename=true near 38 page

Write an essay in which you reveal the significance and importance of your discoveries in the author’s texts, interpreting them for readers who are trying to understand your author’s way of seeing and writing the world.

Write an essay in which you reveal the significance and importance of your discoveries in the author’s texts, interpreting them for readers who are trying to understand your author’s way of seeing and writing the world. Your essay will reveal elements of both form and content that make patterns in the way your author sees and writes the world. You will discover a relationship between several of these elements (you can visualize this relationship as a conceptual tension), in order to form a lens onto your author’s entire book (and by extension their entire body of work). A reader with a passing interest in your author should be able to read your essay and discover a key to that author’s work and mind. As with all creative intellectual work (work which asks your mind to create something new as well as reliable), this essay requires you to accept the challenge of synthesis. Your best chance of saying something both new and reliable is to be honest about the ways in which your pieces of evidence work in parallel: neither agreeing nor disagreeing with one another, but rather providing varying claims about the same object of inquiry. Rather than vainly attempting to prove that the various claims of your evidence do or do not agree (which would oversimplify and flatten the evidence), you must account for the various claims the evidence actually makes (this is the reliable part) and account for the way(s) in which the parallel truths the evidence presents can be thought of as valid at the same time (this is the creative part). Part of the challenge of writing this essay will be to organize your discoveries so that they are compelling. Do not take up the texts one at a time, one paragraph at a time for each text. Find a more interesting organizing principle. Group evidence from the essays by what the evidence itself reveals about the writer; see how the author’s essays talk to one another, how they fall into place in pairs or triplets. Organize the evidence in a way that will reveal and build your idea. Be guided always by the necessity to explain to us the hidden relationship between multiple parallel truths you have discovered about your author. Use these truths and their relationship to form a critical lens about your author that will help you (and your reader) discover an essential key to their work. Stylistic note: Passive constructions must be eradicated from your writing. Change passive constructions (i.e. “More racist comments were made.”) to active constructions (i.e. “Donald Trump made some more racist comments.”) Do you see why the active option is stronger? Look for “is” and “were” in your verb constructions and think of a clearer way to express your thought. Make sure we know who’s doing what.