Best Writer

1. Introduce the topic, provide some overview of the articles you will use, and then have a thesis statement that shows how you will apply the articles to answer a question about the material you have chosen.
2. Summarize and paraphrase the relevant parts of the articles, and contrast and compare. You may find the articles all agree on some points, but have somewhat different interpretations of other points. The ideas you select from the articles will be your “analytic tool” or “theoretical framework.”
3. Present the material you have chosen in, and use the ideas from the article to address your question.
4. Your paper can also address the usefulness of the articles and the “analytic tools” you derive from them. You might find that none of the articles anticipates the kind of material you have found, or you might find that you need to adapt and expand the analytic tool after trying to apply it to the material. The strongest research often expands the theoretical framework of a debate or discussion, rather than just applying it to new material.
5. A brief conclusion that does not restate the paper, but perhaps points towards unanswered questions or future research or broader concerns.
Using an Analytic Tool
An analytic tool is a theory, a principle, or a definition that provides a useful framework for discussing a problem or engaging in a debate. However, it’s important to recognize that an analytic tool is itself the product of an argument and discussion, and all analytic tools are continually open to extension, revision, or even refutation and replacement by a more useful one for the situation.
An analytic tool is valuable, and sometimes even surprising point of view, a way of interpreting some phenomenom, person, event, policy, pattern, that otherwise might be hard to explain (WR 182). In different courses, you will be taught theories that you can apply this way. Obviously, the analytic tools in Chemistry are different from those in History, which are different from those in English Literature.
However, it is important to also evaluate the tool as you use it. There may be times the tool and the subject matter are a smooth fit, and this is not the main concern. But you should always approach an analytic tool or theoretical framework with a critical perspective. Here are questions you can ask about the analytic tool:
1. Usefulness: Does it help you understand the material you are analyzing? Do you understand the analytic tool well enough that you can apply it to the material?
2. Relevance: Does it give you new insights, or answer a previously insoluble problem, or alert you to an aspect of a problem you hadn’t previously considered?
3. Originality: Does it really produce a new idea, or is it merely replicating older ideas in different language?
4. Clarity: can you understand the new ideas, and are they logically coherent?
5. Application: does it apply in the situation it’s being used in, or the situation you plan to use it? For instance, these days the concept of “addiction” has expanded from discussions of physical addiction to alcohol and hard drugs to be applied to things like video games, sugar, social media, etc. It’s certainly worth asking how much of the analytic framework developed in discussions of heroin addiction apply if you are talking about someone being addicted to Facebook, and what aspects of that analytic framework need to be modified.
6. Implications and assumptions: every analytic tool is the product of a discussion and an argument, and every analytic tool carries a set of implications and assumptions that might not be made explicit in that discussion. It’s always worth thinking about what it might mean to take a particular analytic tool seriously as a statement about how to understand the world.
7. Accuracy: does the analytic tool itself rest on solid arguments and proof, and does it seem accurate to your understanding of the subject?
use www.snopes.com

1.Which contemporary practices, other than the four that Appiah mentions, do you think will be the target of future moral criticism?Why?

This should be 200 words per question

2.Please watch the following video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3-BX-jN_Ac (Links to an external site.)

Do you think Singer or Cohen has the strongest argument? Why? Please remember to provide reasons to support you

Discussion board #1- Identify the vulnerable populations in your community using the guide outline in Stanhope Ch 23.
1. Examine health statistics and demographic data in your geographic area to determine which vulnerable groups are predominant. Look through the Internet for examples of agencies you think provide services to these vulnerable groups. If the agency has a web page, read about the target populations they serve, the types of services they provide, and how they are reimbursed for services. Learn about different agencies. Based on your findings, identify gaps or overlaps in services provided to vulnerable groups in your community. How could you deal with these gaps and overlaps to help clients receive needed services? (one paragraph)
2. Identify a specific nurse in your community who works with vulnerable groups. State their name or initials and discuss three roles of this nurse in the community. (one paragraph). Reference the site of information regarding their role.
3. How does the United States (US) welfare system work? Who gets welfare? What should be done to improve the system? Is your state a leader in welfare reform? (one paragraph)

Write a direct link between violence in computer games and violence in society.

Discuss whether college Athletes should be paid or otherwise compensated for their participation in college sports?

Write an informative essay on how MDD affects daily life.

What quality metrics will you put into place and monitor to track the quality of your health care service?
Provide evidence from your research on practices and programs used by health care organizations to monitor quality in the delivery of care. Explain your findings.
Health care organizations are each held to quality and safety standards based on the types of care they provide. As you research the standards of care that impact your program, discuss your findings with your class.
Reflect on the following in a minimum of 500 words:
What quality metrics will you put into place and monitor to track the quality of your health care service?
Provide evidence from your research on practices and programs used by health care organizations to monitor quality in the delivery of care. Explain your findings.

What recommendations would you make to the organization to improve their creative climate?

What is sovereignty? What is the purpose of government? Explain the origins of federalism as a part of American democracy, and the role of states in decision-making in our government.
In Unit 3, you learned about political culture, and in Unit 4, you learned about political representation. First, briefly define the types of political cultures outlined by Elezar. Then, provide a few examples and explanations of representation types (such as, descriptive, proportional, Party Voting, etc.). Finally, explain how a region’s political culture might affect the type of political representation used.

• Explain how the problem/issue impacts a specific population.
• Discuss why and how the current approach is failing
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePolicy Recommendations (about half page)
Policy Recommendations (about half page)
• Specific, practical measures that need to be implemented
• Discuss implementations to be done at the systems level