Best Writer

Attached below (Hatred Enhances Your Self) is the article chosen for the rhetorical analysis. Alongside it is a docx containing the steps I was supposed to follow during the break I spent with my family. The only steps should you need to worry about are steps 6-10. Further specification provided by my professor is as follows:

“Direct your analysis to an audience of your classmates. In your introduction, establish the argumentative conversation to which this argument is contributing. Briefly summarize the argument and present your thesis highlighting two or more rhetorical features of the argument that you find central to the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of this argument. To develop and support your own points, you will need to include textual evidence in the form of examples or short quotations from the argument. Use attributive tags to distinguish your ideas from those of the writer of the argument. Use MLA documentation to cite points and quotations in your essay and in a Works Cited page at the end. Think of your rhetorical analysis as a way to shine a spotlight on important aspects of this argument and to make the argument understandable and interesting for your readers

The Impact of an Individual’s Health Definition on Health Promotion, The Relationship between the Sociological Ecological Model & the Social Capital Theory, The Impact of Health Beliefs on Individual Healthy Behaviors, and 3.2 subject

Overview
The Simulation Checkpoint Assignment in this course directly supports your success on the course project. You will play the simulation game, create the image file of your simulation report, and discuss learned concepts and experiences in your submission.

Prompt
For this assignment, you will play the first run of the Macroeconomics Simulation: Econland from Harvard Business Review, in which you will act as policy adviser for the fictional country of Econland. Select the “Base Case” scenario for this practice run. You may play the simulation as many times as you like. This will directly support your success in your course project, due in Module Eight.

In your submission, remember to include the image of your simulation report. For help with this, see How to Submit an Image File of Your Report. Then, reflect on the decisions you made in the simulation and address the following government intervention options in your submission:

Macroeconomic Indicators: During the simulation, you made decisions concerning government spending. Discuss the impact of your decisions on key macroeconomic indicators such as real GDP growth and unemployment. Refer to the graphs “Real GDP Growth” and “Unemployment Rate” from your simulation results to illustrate the impact.
Interest Rates: Describe how your changes in interest rates impacted inflation and other key macroeconomic indicators used in the simulation. Refer to the “Inflation Rate” graph from your simulation results.
Guidelines for Submission
Submit your assignment as a 1- to 2-page Word document. Use the Introduction section of the Final Project Template Word Document.

In weeks two and three, we reviewed two prominent ideologies, liberalism and conservatism. It was argued that each was a political psychology. In other words, each made claims regarding human nature, politics and governance. In weeks four and five, we reviewed empirical research on political ideology, cognition and personality. Which of these ideologies is supported by the research? To answer this question, please do the following:

a. Briefly outline the key psychological claims made by liberals and conservatives regarding human nature (how people think, how they feel and are motivated, and how they initiate action).

b. Then discuss the results of the relevant political psychological research as it supports or contradicts the ideological claims you outlined in (a).

2) In weeks six, seven and eight, the development approach to the study of political thinking was introduced. Discuss this approach and its political implications. Please do the following:

a. Briefly describe this developmental approach (e.g. Kohlberg, Kegan and Rosenberg).
i. What are the key assumptions guiding this approach?

b. Describe what Rosenberg refers to as ‘systematic reasoning’ focusing on the understanding of people, society and politics it produces.

c. Drawing on you answer to 2b, explain how populism (reviewed in week ten) would be received by people who are thinking systematically.
i. Discuss what the basic nature of populism and the view of politics and governance it advocates.
ii. Explain why systematic thinking would lead to a rejection of the populist message.

Please write a 800-1000 word paper in APA style format discussing Article 2 of the Constitution, the executive branch. Since the president makes up the executive branch, please discuss the following:
– Brief history of the executive branch
– Functions of the executive branch
– What are executive powers and appointment powers? And, how does the president use it?
– Your personal thoughts on how the presidency has evolved since the beginning of the republic.
. You must use a minimum of three scholarly sources, and they must be cited in APA.

Write a three-to-five page essay containing the following:
1. An introductory paragraph containing a brief description of three subject areas studied this semester that you found most interesting and/or informative, and a statement about a contemporary political problem or issue related to the course that will be discussed in greater detail later in the paper. The three subject areas you discuss MUST be from POLS 2 and cannot be topics studied in POLS 1 (i.e., parties, the media, interest groups, elections). Subject areas should focus on topics listed in the syllabus. In POLS 2, one of your topic areas should be one of the three branches of government.
2. Identify, discuss and describe a specific contemporary political problem in one of the three subject areas you identified.
3. Construct and communicate a solution to the problem you identified (above). Make sure to develop and express your solution in the form of an argument that is supported by well-documented and properly cited facts and data. A good paper will have at least 3-5 scholarly sources in addition to the course textbook(s) and course videos.
Correct grammar, capitalization, punctuation, complete sentences, and CITATION of your sources is required. Textbook readings with page numbers (or chapter headings and subheadings for digital textbooks without page numbers) and textbook citation; lectures or video instruction (title and presenter/author of the video); and outside scholarly research must be included in your assignment.
Wikipedia/Encyclopedia/Dictionary/Spark Notes and other similar sources are NOT allowed and will result in an assignment score of zero. Failure to submit the assignment by the deadline will result in a grade of zero for the overall written assignment grade. Citations must be provided in both the body of your essay and in a “Works Cited” section at the conclusion of your essay. Also note that references to court cases must be italicized (Brown v. Board of Education) or underlined (Brown v. Board of Education). If you are using internet citations, you MUST include the FULL URL, title, author (if available) and access date.
Your written assignment should be typed and double spaced with 12-point font and one-inch margins top, bottom, and side. Political Science as a field has adopted the APSA Manual of Style; however, you are free to use the citation style adopted by your major department or the style used in your English composition courses (MLA or other style). Regardless of citation style, all sources must be properly, thoroughly, and consistently cited. Careful attention to grammar, spelling, and the mechanics of presentation is expected. Wikipedia is not a reliable source of information. Any citation of Wikipedia, Dictionary.com (or any Dictionary related website), E-Encyclopedia (or any Encyclopedia website), Spark Notes, Cliff Notes, Reference.com, Shmoop.com, Socialstudieshelp.com, Study.com, Vocabulary.com, Ask.com , Softschools.com, Scholastic.com, biography.com, study.com, quotationspage.com, legallanguage.com, totallyhistory.com, history.com, UShistoryscene.com, The Bible, Major Motion Pictures, or anything similar in a term paper or other assignment in this course will result in an automatic score of 0 (zero) on the assignment. Scholarly resources would include journal articles, books, and news organization websites.

One analysis paper on a relevant public finance/budgeting topic, 5-8 page.. Student may choose their own topic from a list of suggested topics included in Canvas.
The final paper must be of high quality, contain appropriate citations and references and must use the APA style
Other details include: Times New Roman 12-point font, 1-inch margins all the way around, double-spaced, page numbers on each page, and a reference list on a separate page at the end. I will grade the following areas: opening / closing statement, content, grammar, spelling, discussion points, logical, examples, and quality of references/facts.
In addition: prepare a power point presentation (10-12 slides) that follows the findings of the research topic that could be presented in class in 3-5 minutes. Without prior approval, The presentation will be graded on: font size and consistency, color scheme, background template, pictures, opening, closing, sentence/bullet format, and points match paper.

the topic and info needed to write the paper are in the file.

Prompt: ‘Lately we’ve been talking about characters. We analyze their appearances, gestures, dialogue, thoughts, feelings, actions—all to understand their abilities and limitations, inhibitions and motives, fears and desires. Since they consist literally of text, to understand the factors that shape their inner lives and influence their decisions, we have to perform close readings.

Close reading is about showing how form (language) shapes content (character). This requires thinking small: zooming in, interpreting as much meaning as possible from minute details, then using these minor assertions as bits of evidence in a larger argument about a human concern—in this case, the quality of a character.

Choose a character or narrator from one of our stories, find 2-3 key passages about that character, and perform a close reading on any specific feature of the text. You can investigate one feature in isolation or explore how 2 features (like diction/syntax or diction/image) work together create a single effect.

If you’re unsure what feature to focus on, just start writing about what most captures your attention, pour out your thoughts, see how far you get, then revise. Most writers write in a recursive rather than a linear manner: they write, think it over, and rewrite, again and again. They use writing as a tool to develop their ideas.

After you analyze your passages, find what overarching conclusion you can draw from all of them. Write that conclusion in a sentence. This is your thesis. Building from the bottom-up—form detail to argument—is how new, exciting arguments are discovered.

The character can come from anything we’ve read on or after February 6
The character must be chosen from a story you haven’t already written about.
You’re welcome to use a reading prompt response as a starting point.
Close reading:
Notice (The specific feature of the text)
Interpret (How it works, what it means)
Explain significance (Why it matters, why we should care)
Features you could analyze:

Diction (word choice, types of vocabularies, types of verbs, nouns)
Parts of Speech (nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs)
Types of words (germanic, latinate)
Vocabulary categories (i.e. medical terms, filmmaking terms, science, nautical language, religious terms, slang, etc)
Syntax (sentence structure, length, cadence, punctuation)
Tone (impassioned, dry, earnest, ironic)
Imagery (concrete, figurative)
Motifs (recurring images, phrases, words)
Rhetorical devicesLinks to an external site. (litotes, pleonasm, euphemism, irony, wit, humor, etc)
Figures of speech Links to an external site.(anaphora, polysyndeton, aposiopesis, etc.)
Repetition (of words, phrases, images)
Sound (consonance, assonance, alliteration, rhyme, types of consonants and vowels)
Learning goals:

Hone your close reading skills and understanding of literary character
Write with specificity to achieve compression and nuance
Grading criteria:

Specificity and sophistication of your close reading
Organization and clarity of your close reading’

TO ELABORATE: This is purely an analytical essay, and I am looking for a paper that analyzes either the narrator or the ‘beast’ in a moderately sophisticated fashion. here’s some of my old work that is half creative writing and half analytical (second half)

In need professional letter headed, heart felt letter of recommendation for a practical nursing program. The letter must express the trails and tribulations of a teen mother whom always wanted to become a nurse but had to over came diversity. A perosn who had no support system andhad to wait until their childre were of age to pursue thier dreams.

Read Evolution and the origins of disease
By Randolph m. Jesse and George c. Williams

Topic paper: At the end of the article, the authors provide a list of the Selected Principles of Darwinian Medicine. Based on information in the article and other sources, as needed, expound on the following principle: “Our DESIRES, shaped in the ancestral environment to lead us to actions that tended to maximize reproductive success, now often lead us to disease and early death.”