Best Writer

Describe what professionalism means to you and why it is important to your role as a professional in health care.
Explain why you will be successful in the field of health care and the Nursing program at Clarkson College.
Discuss why you wish to attend Clarkson College.
One of the key values of Clarkson College is caring. Provide an example of how you demonstrate this value in your life.
Describe how you have shown leadership in your community

Discuss about the linguistic aspects of presidential inaugural addresses: Abraham Lincoln (1861), John Kennedy (1961), Barak Obama (2009).

“What are customers’ perceptions about artificial intelligence in hospitality and tourism? What are customers’ perceptions about artificial intelligence in hospitality and tourism? “

1. Why is the drug trade is so profitable for illicit drug dealers?

2. What is money laundering?

3. Describe the three stages of Money Laundering?

4. How would drug gangs do money laundering using legitimate Enterprises?

Write a reflection paper on the patient data project and the reading on the Value-based Model (Riley et al in JADA).

1. discussion of the meaning of patient population information
2. relevance to clinical practice
3. how you could use the information to improve dental practice
4. what other information might you want to collect in this manner if you could.

Write a short story that reflects Ernest Hemmingway’s writing style.

Students are to assess the merits of proceeding with Parramatta Light Rail Stage
Two.
The types of questions that students are encouraged to consider include:
• Does the project have a clear rationale?
• What problem is it trying to solve?
• How does the Project fit with the State Infrastructure Strategy, Future Transport
Strategy, Greater Cities Commission’s strategic plan, Infrastructure Australia
plan and other planning frameworks for Western Sydney?
• How will the project link with Parramatta Light Rail Stage One, Sydney Metro
West and other parts of the public transport network?
• Why should the project be progressed now?
• Is the project justified economically?
• What benefits will be delivered by the project?
• What alternatives should be considered which may also achieve the projects
strategic objectives?
• What consideration is made for assessment of wider economic benefits?
• What are the key considerations in developing a proposed packaging and
contracting strategy for the project?
• How can the project be disaggregated into package components and how are
interface issues best managed?
• Does the private sector have the capability to deliver the project and what
preferences around project and transaction structuring are needing to be
considered in developing a delivery model that will attract sufficient market
appetite?
• Does the public sector have the required skills and experience to manage the
implementation of the project?
• Does the private sector have the potential to deliver a value for money solution
and what are the potential value for money drivers?
• What contractual mechanisms can be applied to incentivise performance?
• How will the project be funded and financed? What use can be made of value
capture? How can the funding/financing roles be shared between the private
sector, State Government and Federal Government?
• Who are the key stakeholders and what approach to stakeholder consultation
and community engagement is recommended?
• What are the key project risks and how are these to be mitigated and allocated?
• What public interest issues have been considered and how has the public
responded?
• What other recent precedent projects can be identified and what lessons can be
drawn from those projects and applied in this case?
• Does the project sponsor have suitable decision making and governance
structures to support the procurement and delivery of the project?
2
• Stage One is already in procurement and will result in an incumbent operator
running light rail vehicles; how does this affect the procurement of Stage Two?
Relevant issues are the need for interoperability and the augmentation
framework developed for Sydney Metro and other light rail projects.
• What were the reasons impacting the determination of the delivery strategy for
Stage One? Will the same issues influence the determination of the strategy for
Stage Two? Relevant issues include consideration of utility relocation works,
contamination, interface risks.
• The project is challenged by the market capacity constraints and shortage of
skilled labour; how is this being addressed?
• What are the lessons of experience from the previous stage of Parramatta Light
Rail, Sydney Light Rail and other relevant projects? Extensive information on
other projects is readily available representing the more advanced stages of
delivery. For example, information on business cases, procurement strategy, risk
allocation, governance can be used to illustrate how similar issues facing PRL2
can be addressed.
The recommended approach is to identify and address the key and contentious issues
for the project that need to be considered in the business case. Where information is
not readily available, students should propose what they believe is the correct
approach. Do not spend time unnecessarily paraphrasing the case study or simply
restating the project description. It is recommended that students spend time
researching the following projects and relevant guidance material; a list of reference
material is provided below.
In order to provide guidance on how to approach the assignment, some time will be
allocated for discussion on similar case studies including:
• Sydney Metro
• Melbourne Metro
• Sydney Light Rail
• Gold Coast Light Rail
Students will be expected to complete assignments with a guideline of 2,500 to 3,000
words for the body of the report. Additional material can be attached as appendices,
which are not included in the word count. Exceeding the word count will not be
rigidly penalised but is not advisable.
The Due Date for the assignment is 18 May 2023.
The completed report must be uploaded on Canvas by the due date in either PDF or
Word format. The front page must contain the following information: course code
and name, student IDs, assignment name, and date of submission.
A written assignment is a means of communication. You should structure it so that it
is easy for the reader to understand, using paragraphs to separate points and sub-
3
4
headings to highlight subject matter. Given the practical nature of this course, use of
charts, tables and bullets are advised.
The final written report should include:
• An executive summary covering the key issues to be addressed, and main
findings and recommendations;
• The main body of the assignment, clearly addressing each section in turn.
• A conclusion which draws all previous discussions together.
• Recommendations
• References and bibliography (Harvard style).
• Appendices of material or data used within the assignment.
Common problems in previous years which cause students to lose marks include:
• Poor referencing (quantity, quality and style)
• Not relating the risks to the project in question (being too general)
• Missing obvious risks (not thinking deeply)
• Not backing up your arguments with evidence (eg. Don’t just say “the regulations
could change and affect our project” – you must say how and why and provide
evidence to back this up)
• Making the report too “wordy”. Try to use tables, diagrams and bullets as far as
possible.Students are to assess the merits of proceeding with Parramatta Light Rail Stage
Two.
The types of questions that students are encouraged to consider include:
• Does the project have a clear rationale?
• What problem is it trying to solve?
• How does the Project fit with the State Infrastructure Strategy, Future Transport
Strategy, Greater Cities Commission’s strategic plan, Infrastructure Australia
plan and other planning frameworks for Western Sydney?
• How will the project link with Parramatta Light Rail Stage One, Sydney Metro
West and other parts of the public transport network?
• Why should the project be progressed now?
• Is the project justified economically?
• What benefits will be delivered by the project?
• What alternatives should be considered which may also achieve the projects
strategic objectives?
• What consideration is made for assessment of wider economic benefits?
• What are the key considerations in developing a proposed packaging and
contracting strategy for the project?
• How can the project be disaggregated into package components and how are
interface issues best managed?
• Does the private sector have the capability to deliver the project and what
preferences around project and transaction structuring are needing to be
considered in developing a delivery model that will attract sufficient market
appetite?
• Does the public sector have the required skills and experience to manage the
implementation of the project?
• Does the private sector have the potential to deliver a value for money solution
and what are the potential value for money drivers?
• What contractual mechanisms can be applied to incentivise performance?
• How will the project be funded and financed? What use can be made of value
capture? How can the funding/financing roles be shared between the private
sector, State Government and Federal Government?
• Who are the key stakeholders and what approach to stakeholder consultation
and community engagement is recommended?
• What are the key project risks and how are these to be mitigated and allocated?
• What public interest issues have been considered and how has the public
responded?
• What other recent precedent projects can be identified and what lessons can be
drawn from those projects and applied in this case?
• Does the project sponsor have suitable decision making and governance
structures to support the procurement and delivery of the project?
2
• Stage One is already in procurement and will result in an incumbent operator
running light rail vehicles; how does this affect the procurement of Stage Two?
Relevant issues are the need for interoperability and the augmentation
framework developed for Sydney Metro and other light rail projects.
• What were the reasons impacting the determination of the delivery strategy for
Stage One? Will the same issues influence the determination of the strategy for
Stage Two? Relevant issues include consideration of utility relocation works,
contamination, interface risks.
• The project is challenged by the market capacity constraints and shortage of
skilled labour; how is this being addressed?
• What are the lessons of experience from the previous stage of Parramatta Light
Rail, Sydney Light Rail and other relevant projects? Extensive information on
other projects is readily available representing the more advanced stages of
delivery. For example, information on business cases, procurement strategy, risk
allocation, governance can be used to illustrate how similar issues facing PRL2
can be addressed.
The recommended approach is to identify and address the key and contentious issues
for the project that need to be considered in the business case. Where information is
not readily available, students should propose what they believe is the correct
approach. Do not spend time unnecessarily paraphrasing the case study or simply
restating the project description. It is recommended that students spend time
researching the following projects and relevant guidance material; a list of reference
material is provided below.
In order to provide guidance on how to approach the assignment, some time will be
allocated for discussion on similar case studies including:
• Sydney Metro
• Melbourne Metro
• Sydney Light Rail
• Gold Coast Light Rail
Students will be expected to complete assignments with a guideline of 2,500 to 3,000
words for the body of the report. Additional material can be attached as appendices,
which are not included in the word count. Exceeding the word count will not be
rigidly penalised but is not advisable.
The Due Date for the assignment is 18 May 2023.
The completed report must be uploaded on Canvas by the due date in either PDF or
Word format. The front page must contain the following information: course code
and name, student IDs, assignment name, and date of submission.
A written assignment is a means of communication. You should structure it so that it
is easy for the reader to understand, using paragraphs to separate points and sub-
3
4
headings to highlight subject matter. Given the practical nature of this course, use of
charts, tables and bullets are advised.
The final written report should include:
• An executive summary covering the key issues to be addressed, and main
findings and recommendations;
• The main body of the assignment, clearly addressing each section in turn.
• A conclusion which draws all previous discussions together.
• Recommendations
• References and bibliography (Harvard style).
• Appendices of material or data used within the assignment.
Common problems in previous years which cause students to lose marks include:
• Poor referencing (quantity, quality and style)
• Not relating the risks to the project in question (being too general)
• Missing obvious risks (not thinking deeply)
• Not backing up your arguments with evidence (eg. Don’t just say “the regulations
could change and affect our project” – you must say how and why and provide
evidence to back this up)
• Making the report too “wordy”. Try to use tables, diagrams and bullets as far as
possible.

Assignment Description:

For this assignment, you will be placed (virtually) in a real-world scenario that occurs in schools. Please read the following description of the authentic performance task and complete the requirements as described in the scenario.

Imagine that you have just completed the evaluation process for the two-week curriculum module for all of the 10th grade teachers in your district that you implemented in Week 7. You are now required to present your findings to the district superintendent and other district leaders.

Standards and Criteria for Success:

Develop a presentation style of your choice to explain the evaluation plan that you utilized for this curriculum. Be sure to address the following points:

1. What was the nature and purpose of evaluating this curriculum?

2. What steps of curriculum evaluation did you use? What activities did you undertake to ensure that each step performed its own unique function as part of the evaluation process?

3. Was any formative evaluation used during the development and implementation processes? If so, what needs did that approach to evaluation meet?

4. Describe your findings of the curriculum based on the five value questions presented in the text as are applicable to this curriculum: intrinsic, instrumental, comparative, idealization, and decision value. Which of these questions did you think was most significant in the evaluation process? Give specific examples of ways that you collected data to assist you in answering these questions.

5. Which approaches to evaluation did you use? Why?

6. Which evaluation models did you utilize? Why?

7. Did you use testing to evaluate students’ knowledge of the material? If so, what types? What were the benefits and drawbacks of using this type of assessment?

8. What, if any, challenges did you see as educators worked to meeting the standards stated in the legislation of No Child Left Behind?

9. Was alternative assessment used to judge student learning and curriculum effectiveness? Why or why not? If so, what type?

10. What human issues must you consider when looking at the results of the curriculum evaluation?

11. If applicable, did you feel that the data gathered from your formative or summative assessments were more valuable? Why?

The written product should be 2250 words and include at least three (3) citations. The sections should be clearly marked with headings so that your instructor knows which points you are addressing. Follow the guidelines for APA writing stylAssignment Description:

The following specifications are required for this assignment:

*Length: 2250 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

*Structure: Include a title page introduction, and reference page in APA style. These do not count towards the minimum word count for this assignment.

*References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least three (3) scholarly sources to support your claims.

please read carefully below and the attache doxument. The book must be one of the sources.

Please answer the following questions:

1) Based on your use of streaming services, do you feel the streaming platforms differ in terms of stand-alone value (e.g., fidelity, ease of use, recommender systems, etc.)?

2) Again based on your use, how do you feel the streaming services differ based on the types and quality of the content (the complementary good) they provide?

3) What factors do you think influence a consumer’s choice of whether to subscribe to a streaming service? How important are the standalone features? How important is the content?

4) What are the pros and cons of having content be exclusive to a particular service?

5) Do you think the market will eventually choose a few services as “winners” and the other services will exit (or combine with the winners), or will the market continue to support many different services?

Importantly, apply as many of the COs (Course Objectives) as you can to the case. These are given for reference below.

Your Case should be 2 1/2 – 3 pages (approximately 600 – 750 words), double-spaced, and have at least three references using APA format (you may use one or two references cited from the case, but you should have at least one additional unique reference from your own research) , and typed in an easy-to-read font (Times New Roman 12 font recommended) in MS Word (no pdfs or rtfs or non-standard formats). Please include a cover sheet with your full name, the case name, our course number (NETW583), and the date you submit it.

Submit your assignment.

Course Objectives:

CO A – Describe the industry dynamics of technological innovation.

CO B – Determine whether and how to protect an organization’s technological innovations.

CO C – Identify the core technological competencies of an organization

CO D – Develop a plan to increase the innovative capabilities of an organization both through collaboration strategies and internal innovation.

CO E – Formulate a technological innovation strategy through an organization’s new product development strategy.

CO F – Identify and suggest a deployment strategy that will facilitate the success of a technologically driven organization.

Explain how culture might impact decision making and reasoning? Provide an example of how culture impacts cognitive decision making. How might this be important as you think about your day to day interactions in the workplace or as a business owner? Reference your book and the journal article Culture and decision making (nih.gov) .