Best Writer

Discuss strategic analysis decisions in the next five years, what we need to watch out for in the information technology (IT) field, and how these decisions will impact the overall company.
Examine potential changes in IT related to innovation and organizational processes.
List and describe internal (online) information security risks and mitigation tactics and how they will affect decision-making strategies.
List and describe external (building) information security risks and mitigation tactics and how they will affect decision-making strategies.

Basically need you to take the attached paper with the 10 references and instead of an annotated bibliography I need you to write a ltierature review.
228614
2 minutes ago
For this assessment, submit the current draft of your literature review for instructor feedback and grading. Using your literature search question (LSQ), the annotated bibliography, and the abstracted outline to support your review, identify themes that emerge from your analysis of what we know so far about your topic. Use these themes to describe how your research builds on prior knowledge.
For instance, if your LSQ is What does the literature in psychology tell us about the utility of treating mild depression in adults with a combination of synchronous and asynchronous labyrinth walking and cognitive behavioral therapy? you might discuss literature that covers the themes of exercise and depression, cognitive behavioral therapy and depression, walking meditation and depression, mindfulness and depression, and so on. Do not organize the paper by referencing each article sequentially; your task is to synthesize concepts pertinent to the LSQ from the articles selected for this review.
Identify literature that:
Describes the chosen area of research and provides rationale for the choice.
​Describes the significance of the chosen topic:
Explain and justify the implications of the new knowledge for stakeholders, including community members and those who serve the population.
Summarize sources applicable to the history of the chosen topic:
Discuss historical context and dominant themes in the evolution of the topic; connect common themes and present counteropinions.
Consider theory in light of seminal works by theorists such as Urie Bronfenbrenner, Sigmund Freud, B.F. Skinner, Carol Gilligan, Jean Piaget, Erving Goffman, and Clark Moustakas.
Summarize sources applicable to the theoretical background of the chosen topic:
Provide information about theoretical underpinnings such as empirical/behavioral or constructivist and humanistic orientations of the literature reviewed.
Consider theory in light of seminal works by theorists such as Urie Bronfenbrenner, Sigmund Freud, B.F. Skinner, Carol Gilligan, Jean Piaget, Erving Goffman, Clark Moustakas, Martha Bernal, and George I. Sanchez.
Summarize sources applicable to best practices for engaging in research:
Describe data-collection strategies, research procedures, and approaches for conducting and reporting research.
Summarize sources that add significance and relevance to the knowledge base of psychology:
Indicate how the chosen sources help investigators identify topics that are well understood and other topics that represent gaps in the knowledge base and the need for further study.
Create a scenario that illustrates the need for new research.
Articulate guidelines of the profession applicable to ethical conduct in research practice:
Demonstrate ethical conduct associated with the protection of research subject vulnerabilities such as the need for data privacy.
Identify practices and research guidelines that address respect for individual differences and diversity:
Address individual variation and diversity within and across groups. For example, when writing about marriage and family therapy, acknowledge research choices that exclude or include subgroups such as gay and lesbian families or families of particular racial, ethnic, or cultural compositions.
Adhere to APA style and formatting guidelines, including concise and well-organized writing:
Organize paper to enhance the message and supporting points; writing should reflect the quality and expertise expected for academic work.
Organize and summarize sources thematically.
Your task is to present current considerations important to investigators and to indicate ramifications for stakeholders who rely on the current knowledge base. Use illustrative examples to explain and highlight key concepts. Good reviewers share evidence-based assessments of the current state of knowledge with their audiences.
This assessment is one component of the research concept paper. You are expected to refine this literature review before submitting the final project. Use the research concept paper template to complete the literature review. There are additional details in the template to help guide the completion of this assessment.
Additional Requirements
Formatting: Use the Research Concept Paper Template [DOCX] to complete your assessment. It has been created to reflect the proper structure. To avoid missing content and losing points, please do not modify the template.
Font: New Times Roman, 12 points, double-spaced, or any other font that complies with current APA guidelines.
APA: Use APA format and style throughout, including citations.
Length: The literature review draft assessment should be 5–6 pages, not including references.
Refer to the scoring guide to ensure that you meet all criteria.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Determine the scientific merit of the professional literature.
Identify the research topic accurately.
Describe the significance of the research topic thoroughly.
Demonstrate an accurate, effective understanding of the current state of research and literature on the topic.
Competency 2: Apply theoretical and research findings from the discipline of psychology to professional and academic activities.
Explain the theoretical orientation for the research concept accurately.
Synthesize research findings thoroughly to create a new understanding.
Critique accurately the various methodologies and designs used in prior empirical research related to the study.
Competency 5: Communicate psychological concepts effectively using the professional standards of the discipline.
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.
Competency 6: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the psychological professions.
Exhibit proficiency in writing and use of current APA style.
228614
a minute ago
*PLEASE MAKE SURE COMPETENCIES ARE MET*

In what ways did federal, state, and local policies intersect with American social and cultural norms to further entrench patterns of racial segregation during the mid-century period (1930s – 1960s)?

Address the following in two well-crafted pages. Be sure to ground your arguments in specifics from the provided sources. Use in-text, parenthetical citations (author’s last name, pg. #). If the source is unpaginated (as in the case of the Pruitt-Igoe Myth), just use the author’s (or director’s) last name in parentheses.

I also need a discussion question thats part of this assigment.

Read David Oshinsky, “A Powerful, Disturbing History of Residential Segregation in America,” New York Times, June 20, 2017 and “Author Interviews: ‘The Color of Law’ Details How U.S. Housing Policies Created Segregation,” NPR, May 17, 2017.

“A Powerful, Disturbing History of Residential Segregation in America” can be found at the following site: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/20/books/review/richard-rothstein-color-of-law-forgotten-history.html
“Author Interviews: ‘The Color of Law’ Details How U.S. Housing Policies Created Segregation” can be found at the following site: https://www.npr.org/2017/05/17/528822128/the-color-of-law-details-how-u-s-housing-policies-created-segregation

I’ve also created a Word doc for the NYT article (in case you don’t have a subscription or immediate access).
Documentary: The Pruitt-Igoe Myth
It can be rented from Amazon (for about 3.99) without commercials, or, viewed for free from Pluto (though it has commercials and the platform requires a little bare information). Below is the Pluto link: https://pluto.tv/on-demand/movies/the-pruitt-igoe-myth-1-1
The director is: Chad Freidrichs (If you have Amazon Prime, it too might be “free” to access.)

Write a
description of the process of creating high-performance teams, to include information on the recruitment,
selection and training of team members.
Can include any information on describing the key elements of recruiting for high-performing teams; analyzing strategies for recruitment to maximize team member potential and success. Identify the difference between a group of employees and a team.·
Examine the process of
creating new teams.
·

What are the similarities and dissimilarities between Durkheim and Weber’s views on religion? How do these views compare to the Christian world view of religion? Provide a scriptural reference.

Explain Content Analysis then perform a Content Analysis of a current major news story in the Canadian Press.

You should cover multiple days in multiple media. You must include: tv, newspaper, radio, and they should be from different parent companies (e.g. do not use CBC radio as well as CBC television).

PROMPT A:
Choose a visual, audio or verbal art piece that speaks to you and explain why it resonates with you. Share your selection with the class by posting a link, attaching an image or otherwise assuring that the class can see or hear your selection.
PROMPT B:
Create an art piece yourself in either a visual, audio or verbal medium to present to the class. It may help to have some of the readings for this week in the back of your mind (i.e., Mark Doty, Michael Chabon, Susan Sontag) as you create your art piece. The only two requirements are that every part of the piece be important to you, and that it be dynamic. In other words, the piece should express your enthusiasm for the subject and medium you have chosen. Explain the process of creating your own piece and its meaning to you. Please note: Vacation photos will not fulfill the requirements for this discussion assignment.

What is the purpose of financial forecasting and how would you use proformas to make your small business more successful? Provide details and at least two examples in your response.

Step ONE:
Draft Your Research Essay

Your research essay requires
the following:

●
Write a 2,000 to 2,500-word research essay that: (1) explains the
history and current debate of a controversial
topic,
(2) asserts an opinion about the
debate, and (3) ultimately persuades readers to support your position.
○
”Debatable” means a topic about which intelligent, well-meaning
people may disagree. Keep in mind that your audience will be skeptical, so plan
your arguments accordingly.
○
The key to a solid argument is to ensure that your
argument is well-balanced, thorough, and supported by information gleaned from
credible written sources such as scholarly journals, trade publications, and books.

● Your research essay must
include the following elements:
○
Clear title and introduction, which present the history of the problem
in an engaging manner
○
Accurate description of the topic as it is currently
presented in the literature and clear descriptions of the various viewpoints
○
Evaluation and analysis of the debate
○ At least eight reliable and
authoritative secondary sources

●
To help you get started, try following these steps:
○ Begin by drafting an outline
of your research essay.

○
Use your outline to write a rough draft of your paper that incorporates
your sources.
■ Take advantage of credible
websites, radio, or even television programs, but not to the exclusion of
printed sources. If possible, interview a leader in the field- the idea is to
have a balance of source types. Remember to use your critical thinking skills
to determine the validity and reliability of each source before you decide to
include it.
■ Your sources should be
current (usually not more than ten years old), unless you are providing
historical background or the source is a seminal work in the field. All quotations, summaries, and paraphrases
must be correctly cited and documented using APA citation guidelines.
Step TWO: Complete the Research Essay
Submission Checklist
Before you
submit, check to see if you believe you have met the criteria noted below. Did
you….
ü Select and explain the
history and current debate of a controversial
topic?
ü
Provide a clear title and introduction that is engaging for your audience?
ü Clearly present the
debatable issue and make connections between different viewpoints?
ü
Present your own point of view and make persuasive arguments in favor
of it?
ü Conduct a thorough
evaluation and analysis of the debate?
ü
Cite at least eight reliable, authoritative sources?
ü Demonstrate APA academic
writing which is clear, concise, and factually
correct?
ü Adhere to
the 2,000 to 2,500-word length requirement, double-space your essay, and use
the 12-point Times New Roman font?

List of Approved Topics for Possible Selection (some topics may require that you narrow the focus)
1. Should students who engage in cyberbullying, even from off campus, face sanctions at school?
2. Was the Supreme Court’s decision in Kelo vs. New London the correct one? (Eminent Domain)
3. Should other states adopt Oregon’s “Death with Dignity Act” or similar legislation?
4. Should college athletes be paid to play?
5. Are the current security methods employed by the TSA effective?
6. Are video games making children smarter?
7. Should there be a national law that prohibits paparazzi from taking and/or selling photos of children of famous parents?
8. Is nuclear power a safe form of energy?
9. Should the minimum wage be raised to $10.00 an hour?
10. Should Florida’s “stand your ground” law be introduced in other states?
11. Should there be a limit on how much homework K-12 students are given each night?
12. Are genetically engineered foods safe?
13. Should photo identification be required to cast a vote?
14. Should torture be used to interrogate suspected terrorists?
15. Is obesity the result of behavior, environment, or genetics?

THIS IS FOR A DISSCUSION BOARD, THIS IS NOT AN ESSAY. PLEASE READ MY CLASS’ INSTRUCTIONS ABOUT DISSCUSSION BOARDS TO ENSURE THIS IS DONE SUCCESSFULLY.

In each Discussion Board you will be asked to reference, provide a direct quotation, and cite an article from a credible scholarly journal located by going to Library One ( https://docs.google.com/document/d/19CeVdmGblfZk1yR7L1h6pctgj8B8BHNV/edit ) No websites, textbooks, books, or compilations will be accepted. Please makes sure that your article is from a scholarly journal and that the name of that scholarly journal is clearly evident in your citation.
Steps for Library One
What is a scholarly journal article?
Scholarly journal articles are pieces written by historians or others who are experts in their fields. These are substantive, reliable, and well-documented sources of information on specific topics, events, or people. These are not websites, textbooks, books, or compilations. Websites, textbooks, books, or compilations will be accepted. will be accepted.
Here are a few examples of credible journals in the field. But, you are in no means limited by theses. You may find related articles in economics journals, political science journals, or from other fields of scholarship as well.
The American Historical Review
The Journal of Modern History
American Nineteenth Century History
American Quarterly
The Journal of American History (formerly Mississippi Valley Historical Review)
Journal of American Studies
Journal of the Early Republic
Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era
Pacific Historical Review
Reviews in American History
Also, you must reference, provide a direct quotation, and cite one piece of evidence from your textbook, Give me Liberty.
Please do not use more than 1 quotation from each source (two quotations in total).
Your direct quotations and in text citations will look something like this:
In Give Me Liberty, an argument is presented that “the Marshall Plan offered a positive vision to go along with containment” (Foner, 912).
Please note: You also need a full citation for each of your sources under a Works Cited section at the bottom of your initial post. Replies to classmates require no citations.
You must use MLA Format for both your in-text documentation and your works cited. For more information on how to site your scholarly article and the video series, go to properly citing your work in the discussion boards.
You must be thorough and address everything that needs to be addressed. However, this is a discussion board, not a formal essay or research paper. Being thorough does not mean being overly verbose. Your initial post should be between 250 and 300 words. Each reply should be at least 150 words. Please place your word count at the end of your post and both of your replies, such as this (300 words).
Before posting, please make sure that you re-read the ABCs of an effective original post and the KEY to successful replies. IMPORTANT: Plagiarism will not be tolerated.
Below is the Criteria for an Exemplary Original Post (OP) and Replies:
OP is 250-300 words, restates prompt, addresses topic in full, is thorough and thoughtful, and backed with facts/data.
Article used in OP is credible, quoted (direct quote with parenthetical documentation), and properly cited (full citation) using MLA documentation.
Textbook is quoted in OP (direct quote with parenthetical documentation) and properly cited (full citation) using MLA documentation.
Two replies (at least 150 words each) must (1) evaluate legitimacy (2) address similarities/ differences to your OP (3) clearly indicated agreement or disagreement with classmate’s post (4) be backed up with evidence. (Replies to classmates require no citations. Replies to classmates should be in your own words. Direct quotes should not be included in replies.)
Both OP and replies make connections to the course content and global issues.

THE ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS

Prompt: How did the events of 9/11 impact America’s foreign policy? (Select one country and do a before and after 9/11 comparison. How did U.S. relations with and actions towards this country change in the immediate post-9/11 world?) Compare your findings to what you have learned in this module. Remember, to clearly indicate which country you are addressing.