Best Writer

Classical! What is classical about 1750 to 1820? What does “classical” mean? Some thinkers refer to “classical music” as a broad and general category of orchestral or operatic music on one style or another, but by now we know that not all orchestral music is classical (nor is all classical music orchestral), etc. As you become an increasingly intelligent listener (and always a better writer) you will distinguish between Baroque keyboard music, Classical piano sonatas, and later, Romantic masterworks (upcoming modules).
(1) Please choose one famous Classical composer and a composition from that individual which appeals to you. Next dig deeper and find an obscure Classical composer. Choose a piece from the obscure composer you find interesting.
(2) Create a post on the “Call and Response” discussion board stating the composers you chose, titles of pieces you selected, and links to the examples in music you heard. Conclude by describing why you think one composer stands the test of time while another is lost in the archives. If you think the obscure music is more effective in moving your musical soul, speculate as to reasons that may have contributed to on composer’s obscurity.

Instructions: Answer the following essay question. This is an exam and you must work on each question on your own. Collaboration will result in disciplinary action. Turnitin will be used to determine authenticity of your work. Your answers MUST be submitted via Canvas. No late work will be accepted. Submissions must be in Microsoft Word or PDF (.doc, .docx, .pdf). Other file formats will not be accepted (pages, etc). Late submissions or submissions in unacceptable file formats will be given 0/50 points.
You will be graded on your ability to communicate your knowledge and understanding of the problem by describing the reasons for how the environmental problem has developed and solutions. For each question use appropriate terminology and concepts to describe the problem and solutions. It is highly recommended you use terms and concepts from multiple chapters for each question. Use no less than 5 terms for each question and define each term. Terms are defined as words which are emphasized (bolded, etc.) in the textbook or lecture material. The maximum grade that can be assessed for use of 5 appropriate terms is 37.5 points (75%), 8 terms is 42.5 points (85%) and 12 terms is 47.5 points (95%). Terms and concepts must be bolded.
Grading Rubric:
Spelling, grammar, and sentence structure10%
3 mistakes = -5%; 5 mistakes = -10%
Use of appropriate terms and definitions 50%
Description of the problem30%
Causes of problem
Consequences to species and/or ecosystem
Discussion of solutions10%
Question:
Climate change is a global environmental problem that requires a global solution. Describe why climate is changing using data, terms, and concepts from lectures and textbook chapters (2, 18, 19, and 23 specifically). There are multiple parts to this question. Please address all parts to the question below:
Why climate is changing? What are the causes of change?
What evidence do we have that climate is changing? Provide data.
Explain what the IPCC is and what it does.
What are potential impacts of climate change?
Will impacts be uniform across time and space? Explain and provide examples.
Will everyone be effected by climate change equally? Explain.
What are the approaches to addressing climate change outlined by the UNFCC?
What is climate mitigation and adaption?
How will /has climate change effect you and your family?
What are you likely to do to either reduce your carbon footprint or adapt? How likely are you to make that change?

How significant is chronic illness in aged populations? What misconceptions about aging are there regarding chronic disease?
In what ways can aged patients enhance their daily lives and promote overall wellness? What sort of strategies do you share with your aged patients?

Botany career. Discuss your academic and career goals. What makes you passionate about this career choice? Discuss your academic plan to your intended transfer institution. How would this academic plan get you to your career field?

Find at least one piece of evidence from each of the following categories to prove that your selected society is in its golden age:
• artistic, architectural, and/or intellectual achievements
• medical technological, and/or scientific contributions
•economics
politics and government
• social developments and/or humanitarian efforts
Write an essay that explains why you think the society is in its “golden age”. Include descriptions and details about each piece of evidence you found. Be sure to clearly explain how each piece of evidence helps prove that the society you selected is in its golden age

The book name of the pdf file is called: Hallucinations by Oliver Sacks

These entries should be 250 words in length and answer these questions:

Sum up the point of the reading in a sentence or two. What is the author’s agenda? What are they trying to convey? Get to the heart of the piece.
How is the author making their argument? How is it structured? What kind of evidence are they invoking? Where does the argument derive its strength?
What are the shortcomings of the argument? What are its limitations?
What are your takeaways from the reading? What questions do you still have?

Write a paper on the topic of machine learning algorithm results and comparison using my fMRI data. Please contact me for details.

Prepare the paper using the American Psychological Association (APA) format; this format is described in detail in the APA Publication Manual. Grading will stress content, analysis, and style. Seek to creatively apply leadership theory. The paper work must be more than a mere review of facts and articles. It must demonstrate reasoning, by applying at least three relevant theories and models together to analyze the topic.
The paper must be at least three thousand words in length, not counting tables, figures, and any (optional) Appendices; it must correctly cite and use at least 10 ACADEMIC references, NOT counting the textbook. ALL cited sources must appear both within the body of the text and in the References list. NOTE: for an “A” grade, the paper must use articles from respected journals, academic papers, conference proceedings or text books. Most of these periodicals are available on line from the Troy University Library.
Here is a suggested outline.
Short! Explain why the topic is important! Include objectives of the paper.
LITERATURE REVIEW
ANALYSIS — Apply the models; make inferences, draw conclusions.
DISCUSSION — Discuss the implications of your findings above, especially for managers.
CONCLUSION – Restate your conclusions and sum up, in about one half page
REFERENCES
APPENDICES (optional)
In choosing a topic, avoid shallow, insipid generalities (e.g., “the importance of leadership”).
Choose a topic of current importance that has not been already overdone. Also, where possible, exemplify your concepts and conclusions by consistently referring to a single, real, focal leader. (Avoid US Presidents and generals.) Here are some suggestions:
The burnout of leaders Removal of leaders
Leadership, power, corruption Substitutes for leadership
Followership Cross cultural leadership
LMX in relation to other theories Non-traditional – e.g., native tribes, organized crime

5 PAGES FOR PAPER, 1 PAGE FOR PEER REVIEW
PEER REVIEW FOR AFTER PAPER:
You complete the following 1 page (double-spaced) Self-Review: Write a one-page reflection on your review of your own Module 3 rough draft. For this 1-page Self-Review, look at your body paragraphs; do your paragraphs reflect clarification of the different topics of ethos that you are analyzing (context, tone, research/evidence, structure, values, language, etc.)? Your outline of the paper should be reflected in the body paragraphs. Next, are your body paragraphs made-up of a careful selection of quotes from your scholarly article that help evidence your claim (the authors’ tone builds trust with the audience; the authors’ evidence shows scholarly insight and intelligence that builds authority and trust, etc.)? Do you explain the quotes? How is the integration of quotes? Does this read clearly as the reader works to understand your arguments? Look at the Sentence-level Worksheet (Sentence_Level Worksheet -1.pdf
Actions
) to review the correct and effective ways to connect your sentences/ideas. Lastly, review the Outlines on Canvas and the Samples to see how other students built their Module 3 analyses. Again, for this third option of the Peer Review Exercise, simply write a 1-page double-spaced review of your Module 3 rough draft in light of all the questions and references above (feel free to go over 1-page).

PROMPT FOR PAPER:
Commence your work by locating a text published in a peer reviewed or professional periodical associated with your major, discipline, or specialization (this can be a broad reach, connection or association with your major (PSYCHOLOGY) — the more the article relates to and interests you the better). The text you select will need to have been published in a credible periodical within the past 3-4 years (so, nothing before 2017, please). And, the text should be a minimum of ten pages in length (not including Works Cited/References, Bibliography). Please make sure your text meets these requirements. A five-page “scholarly” article published in 2005 will not work, for instance.
Using this single text published in a professional and/or scholarly periodical associated with your discipline or major, you are tasked with analyzing its author’s use of “conventions of academic writing” and strategies for developing ethos. Identify multiple conventions used, examine why they were chosen, and analyze the effects they have upon the author’s target audience. If you have some insight on a particular failure of the author to establish her/his/their credibility as speakers on the issue/topic addressed in the selected text, you can explain that, as well. I do not suspect that this kind of criticism of the authors’ ethos will come into play, i.e., you don not have to find fault with your selected author(s).
Please include an appropriate introductory section, one that introduces your text and what you plan to accomplish in the analysis. Furthermore, make sure you have devised an analysis of the authors’ ethos that meets the demands of our expanded definition of ethos, looking at the variety of methods that academics use in their chosen discourse to advance a compelling argument.
Your paper should be 4-5 MLA formatted pages.
A Works Cited page is not included in this total but is required.
Criteria for Evaluation:
Successful papers will
Provide an introductory section that engages readers and introduces them to your selected text and purpose of this assignment;
Identify and demonstrate the author’s use of different conventions, elements and strategies for establishing ethos and explain whether the author is successful in establishing ethos;
Identify and analyze some of the different elements of academic writing used to develop the text;
Conclude the response appropriately by exploring the paper’s significance for others;
Use an effective structure that carefully guides the reader from one idea to the next, including the use of transition phrases and sentences between ideas;
Be thoroughly edited and use appropriate diction and tone to satisfy an academic audience’s expectations;
Meet MLA standards for format, style, citation, and documentation.

Write a one page essay discussing one of theories you have learned this semester and applying it to a scenario in your childhood. Where can you see a correlation between what you might have experienced and a theory we have discussed.